全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

损益情境下大学生主观幸福感对跨期选择的影响
The Effect of Subjective Well-Being on Intertemporal Choice of Undergraduates under the Loss and Gain Situations

DOI: 10.12677/AP.2021.1112332, PP. 2916-2921

Keywords: 损益情境,主观幸福感,跨期选择
Loss and Gain Situations
, Subjective Well-Being, Intertemporal Choice

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

采用测量法与实验法相结合,探究损益情境下大学生主观幸福感对跨期选择的影响。结果表明:1) 大学生主观幸福感与跨期选择衡量指标延迟折扣率存在显著负相关;2) 低主观幸福感大学生的延迟折扣率显著大于高主观幸福感;3) 获益情境下的延迟折扣率显著大于损失情境;4) 大学生主观幸福感与情境交互作用显著,获益情境下,低主观幸福感大学生的延迟折扣率显著大于高主观幸福感,损失情境下高、低主观幸福感大学生的延迟折扣率不存在显著差异。研究发现,获益情境下大学生更倾向于即时选项,结果支持“符号效应”;获益情境下,高主观幸福感大学生更倾向于延迟选项;损失情境下,两者均倾向于延迟选项。通过探究大学生主观幸福感对跨期选择的影响,有利于大学生在日常决策时做出更加理性的选择,避免短视现象。
Combining measuring method and experimental method, to study the effect of subjective well- being on intertemporal choice under loss and gain situations, we found that: firstly, there had significant negtive correlation between subjective well-being and delay discounting rate; Secondly, the delay discounting rate of the group of low subjective well-being was significant larger than the group of high subjective well-being; Thirdly, the delay discounting rate of gain situations was significant larger than loss situations; Lastly, the interaction between subjective well-being and situations was significant, on the gain situation, the delay discounting rate of the group of high subjective well-being was significant larger than the group of low subjective well-being, while the delay discounting rate was no significant difference on loss situation for the high and low group of low subjective well-being. The conclusions were followed: on the gain situation, undergraduates were more likely to choose immediate option, supported the “sign effect”; on the gain situation, the undergraduates of high subjective well-being prefered to the delay option; on the loss situation, all of them were tended to choose delay option. Through the study, we could help the student do the better choice when they decided.

References

[1]  陈海贤, 何贵兵(2011). 识解水平对跨期选择和风险选择的影响. 心理学报, 43(4), 442-452.
[2]  段建华(1996). 主观幸福感概述. 心理学动态, 14(1), 46-51.
[3]  梁竹苑, 刘欢(2011). 跨期选择的性质探索. 心理科学进展, 19(7), 959-966.
[4]  倪亚琨(2016). 高低拖延者的跨期选择倾向及其神经机制. 硕士学位论文, 开封: 河南大学.
[5]  裴颖颖, 赵立军, 张雪伟, 魏祥迁(2019). 乐观水平对大学生跨期选择倾向的影响. 中国临床心理学杂志, 27(4), 668-671+667.
[6]  王鹏, 刘永芳(2009). 情绪对跨时选择的影响. 心理科学, 32(6), 1318-1320.
[7]  杨鑫蔚, 何贵兵(2015). 主观幸福感对跨期决策的影响. 应用心理学, 21(3), 242-248.
[8]  张陆, 佐斌(2007). 自我实现的幸福——心理幸福感研究述评. 心理科学进展, 15(1), 134-139.
[9]  庄锦英, 应娟娟, 杨文渊(2017). 时间方向等因素影响跨期决策的实验研究. 心理与行为研究, 15(2), 218-222.
[10]  Carter, D. M. (2011). Recognizing the Role of Positive Emotions in Fostering Environmentally Responsible Behaviors. Ecopsychology, 3, 65-69.
https://doi.org/10.1089/eco.2010.0071

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133