|
|
Modern Linguistics 2021
英语中动态的象似性分析
|
Abstract:
任何语言表达都是有理据的。象似性即理据性，非象似性即更为隐性复杂的理据性，其语言表达更倾向于违背象似性原则。本文定性象似性分析了英语中动态。得出结论为：英语中动态主要遵守了线性序列时间原则和距离原则，违背了线性序列信息原则、数量象似性原则和对称象似性原则。另外我们探讨了中动态表达违背象似性原则的深层理据。
Every linguistic expression is motivated. Iconicity is motivation, while non-iconicity is of more implicit and complex motivation whose explicit linguistic expressions own the tendency to violate the iconic principles. This essay conducts a qualitative iconicity analysis of English Middle Voice. The conclusion emerges as follows: English Middle Voice mainly obeys the following iconic principles as linear time principle and distance principles, while mainly violating the following principles as quantity principle and symmetry principle. The investigation into the deep motivation behind these violations is also included in our research.
| [1] | Halliday, M.A.K. (2008) An Introduction to Functional Grammar. Edward and Arnold/Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press, London/Beijing. |
| [2] | 豆涛, 邵志洪. 英汉中动结构对比及其认知阐释[J]. 西安外国语大学学报, 2010(1): 29-33. |
| [3] | 王寅. 论语言符号的象似性[J]. 外语与外语教学, 1999(5): 4-8. |
| [4] | Haiman, J. (1980) The Iconicity of Grammar: Isomorphism and Motivation. Language, 56, 515-540.
https://doi.org/10.2307/414448 |
| [5] | 文旭. 词序的象似性探讨[M]//王寅, 主编. 中国语言象似性研究论文精选. 长沙: 湖南人民出版社, 2009: 256-270. |
| [6] | Hiraga, M.K. (2005) Metaphor and Iconicity: A Cognitive Ap-proach to Analysing Text. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230510708 |
| [7] | Haiman, J. (2009) Natural Syntax: Iconicity and Erosion. Cambridge University Press/Beijing World Publishing Corporation, Cambridge/Beijing. |
| [8] | 王寅. 语义理论与语言教学[M]. 上海: 上海外语教育出版社, 2001. |
| [9] | 王寅. 认知语言学[M]. 上海: 上海外语教育出版社, 2007. |
| [10] | Givon, T. (1985) Iconicity, Isomorphism and Non-Arbitrary Coding in Syntax. In: Hairnan, J., Ed., Iconicity in Syntax, John Benjamins, Amsterdam/Philadelphia, 187-219. https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.6.10giv |
