全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

微血管减压术预后与并发症的危险因素——Meta分析
Risk Factors for Prognosis and Complications after Microvascular Decompression—A Meta Analysis

DOI: 10.12677/ACM.2021.1112914, PP. 6156-6168

Keywords: 微血管减压术,并发症,危险因素,多因素回归,病例对照研究,队列研究,Meta分析
Microvascular Decompression
, Complications, Risk Factors, Logistic, Case Control Study, Cohort Study, Meta Analysis

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

目的:通过系统评估微血管减压术(Microvascular Decompression, MVD)的预后和并发症的危险因子,为改善MVD手术预后及并发症提供预防的依据。方法:计算机检索中国知网(CNKI)、中国生物医学文献数据库(CBM)、万方数据库、The Cochrane Library、PubMed、EMbase等数据库,文献检索的发表时间为2015年1月1日至2021年1月1日,检索语为“微血管减压术”、“logitic”、“并发症”、“危险因素”和相关自由词。文献检索的研究类型是病例对照研究和队列研究。全面收集相关案例,根据纳入标准和排除标准进行筛选,用纽卡斯尔–渥太华(NOS)文献质量评价表对选定的文献进行质量评价,评分≥ 7 (高质量)的文献,用RevMan5.3作为处理软件进行Meta分析。结果:19篇文献符合纳入基准,累计病例数和对照数分别为770例和2604例,Meta分析的结果如下。MVD手术预后的危险因子包括:责任血管包括基底动脉(OR = 8.08, 95% CI: 3.27~19.98)、无血管神经压迹(OR = 2.84, 95% CI: 1.79~4.52)、非典型临床表现(OR = 7.42, 95% CI: 4.29~12.83)。MVD术后并发症的危险因素是,责任血管通过神经根通过血管从神经根进入脑干(OR = 2.75, 95% CI: 1.87~4.05),骨窗前缘到颞骨岩部内侧面的距离 > 2 cm (OR = 2.93, 95% CI: 1.91~4.52),手术时间 >4 h (OR = 2.55 95% CI: 1.93~3.37)。结论:责任血管包括椎基底动脉、无血管神经压迹、非典型的临床表现是MVD手术预后相关的独立危险因子,患者有上述危险因子的情况下,术后症状的缓解率相对降低。责任血管发出穿支血管包绕神经根出/入脑干区(REZ),骨窗前缘至颞骨岩部内侧面的距离2 cm、手术时间 > 4 h是MVD术后并发症的独立危险因素,患者在有上述危险因素时,术后并发症的发生率变高。对这些危险因素的处理有助于提高患者MVD手术的成功率并降低术后并发症的发生风险。
Objective: To explore the risk factors of prognosis and complications after microvascular decompression by means of systematic evaluation, and provide evidence for the prevention complications after microvascular decompression. Methods: CNKI, CBM, Wanfang Database, the Cochrane Library, PubMed Database, EBSCO Full-text Database and other databases were searched by computer. The publication time of the literature search was from January 1, 2015 to January 1, 2021. The search terms were “microvascular decompression”, “logistic”, “complications”, “risk factors” and related free words. The research types of literature retrieval are case-control study and cohort study. Comprehensively collect relevant cases, screen them according to the inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria, and evaluate the quality of the selected documents with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. For the documents with a score ≥ 7 (high quality), RevMan5.3 perform meta-analysis as processing software. Result: A total of 19 articles were included in the meta-analysis with the cumulative number of cases and controls reaching 770 and 2604 respectively. Meta-analysis showed that the risk factors for prognosis after microvascular decompression are vertebrobasilar artery as offending vessel (OR = 8.08, 95% CI: 3.27~19.98), morphologic changes on the nerve (OR = 2.84, 95% CI: 1.79~4.52), atypical cases (OR = 7.42, 95% CI: 4.29~12.83). Meta-analysis showed that the risk factors for complications after microvascular decompression are perforating arteries adjacent to REZ (OR = 2.75, 95% CI: 1.87~4.05), distance from the anterior edge of bone window to the interior wall of petrousal bone

References

[1]  Thomas, K.L. and Vilensky, J.A. (2014) The Anatomy of Vascular Compression in Trigeminal Neuralgia. Clinical Anatomy, 27, 89-93.
https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.22157
[2]  王天宇. 显微血管减压术对偏侧面肌痉挛患者生活质量影响的临床研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 北京: 北京协和医学院, 2018.
[3]  Clifford, G. (2006) Pain Management in Patients with Glossopharyngeal Neuralgia. Topics in Pain Management, 22.
[4]  郭春平, 杨晓雅, 柯磊. 原发性三叉神经痛患者抑郁发生情况及其影响因素分析[J]. 华南预防医学, 2020, 46(4): 421-423.
[5]  马云峰. 微血管减压术治疗颅神经血管压迫综合征的临床分析[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 济南: 山东大学, 2016.
[6]  Ul, H.N., Ali, M., Khan, H.M., et al. (2016) Immediate Pain Relief by Microvascular Decompression for Idiopathic Trigeminal Neuralgia. Journal of Ayub Medical College, Abbottabad: JAMC, 28, 52-55.
[7]  王国福, 崔连旭, 王辉, 等. 微血管减压术治疗面肌痉挛的临床疗效和安全性[J]. 临床合理用药杂志, 2020, 13(31): 149-150.
[8]  Cruccu, G. (2017) Trigeminal Neuralgia. Continuum (Minneap Minn), 23, 396-420.
https://doi.org/10.1212/CON.0000000000000451
[9]  徐武, 梁维邦, 陆天宇. 微血管减压术治疗颅神经疾病1982例临床分析[J]. 立体定向和功能性神经外科杂志, 2016, 29(1): 9-12.
[10]  王晶, 周璐, 戴宇翔, 等. 显微血管减压术后严重并发症的处理及防治策略[J]. 中国微侵袭神经外科杂志, 2020, 25(11): 493-496.
[11]  Zhao, H., Zhang, X., Tang, Y.-D., et al. (2017) Operative Complications of Microvascular Decompression for Hemifacial Spasm: Lessons from Experience of 1548 Cases. World Neurosurgery, 107, 559-564.
[12]  Alford, E.N., Chagoya, G., Elsayed, G.A., et al. (2020) Risk Factors for Wound-Related Complications after Microvascular Decompression. Neurosurgical Review, 44, 1093-1101.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-020-01296-1
[13]  Cheng, J., Meng, J., Liu, W., et al. (2017) Nerve Atrophy in Trigeminal Neuralgia Due to Neurovascular Compression and Its Association with Surgical Outcomes after Microvascular Decompression. Acta Neurochirurgica (Wien), 159, 1699-1705.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-017-3250-9
[14]  Cote, D.J., Dasenbrock, H.H., Gormley, W.B., et al. (2019) Adverse Events after Microvascular Decompression: A National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Analysis. World Neurosurgery, 128, e884-e894.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.05.022
[15]  Kong, C., Guo, Z., Xu, X., et al. (2019) Delayed Facial Palsy after Microvascular Decompression for Hemifacial Spasm. World Neurosurgery, 134, e12-e15.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.08.105
[16]  Sarun, N., Kasemsak, P. and Bunpot, S. (2018) Microvascular Decompression for Treatment of Trigeminal Neuralgia: Factors That Predict Complete Pain Relief and Study of Efficacy and Safety in Older Patients. World Neurosurgery, 110, e979-e988.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2017.11.147
[17]  观龙彬, 容嘉彬, 吴勇, 等. 特发性面肌痉挛术后迟发性面瘫的危险因素分析及预防[J]. 医学综述, 2020, 26(5): 1017-1020.
[18]  郭荣亮. MVD治疗PTN的疗效与责任血管类型的关系分析[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 石家庄: 河北医科大学, 2019.
[19]  李曙, 田春鸥, 李锦, 等. 三叉神经痛微血管减压术的疗效与责任血管类型的关系[J]. 中国微侵袭神经外科杂志, 2018, 23(11): 481-484.
[20]  凌兴飞. 面肌痉挛患者微血管减压术后迟发性面瘫的影响因素分析[J]. 中国实用医刊, 2018, 45(14): 47-49.
[21]  刘剑波. 微血管减压术下原发性三叉神经痛患者预后影响因素分析[J]. 牡丹江医学院学报, 2018, 39(5): 26-29.
[22]  司书喜. 三叉神经痛微血管减压术治疗影响的 疗效及其预后因素分析[J]. 实用临床医学, 2018, 19(1): 47-49.
[23]  唐剑. 微血管减压术治疗面肌痉挛致面神经及听神经并发症的相关危险因素分析[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 南宁: 广西医科大学, 2018.
[24]  田春鸥, 杨志刚, 李子付, 等. 面肌痉挛微血管减压术的疗效与责任血管类型的关系[J]. 中国微侵袭神经外科杂志, 2015, 20(12): 535-538.
[25]  佟浩. 微血管减压术治疗面肌痉挛的疗效与责任血管类型的关系分析[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 石家庄: 河北医科大学, 2017.
[26]  王亚. 面肌痉挛显微血管减压手术后面瘫的探究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 天津: 天津医科大学, 2018.
[27]  叶均, 刘进, 冯家丰, 等. 微血管减压术治疗面肌痉挛的安全性及影响因素分析[J]. 中华保健医学杂志, 2020, 22(5): 484-486.
[28]  赵伟, 唐辉, 邵川, 等. 神经内镜下微血管减压术治疗面肌痉挛临床效果及面肌痉挛术后并发症发生危险因素分析[J]. 临床误诊误治, 2019, 32(2): 78-82.
[29]  赵永辉. 微血管减压术治疗三叉神经痛的临床及随访研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 济南: 山东大学, 2019.
[30]  Moller, A.R. (1991) The Cranial Nerve Vascular Compression Syndrome: II. A Review of Pathophysiology. Acta Neurochirurgica (Wien), 113, 24-30.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01402110
[31]  钟崛, 罗聪, 余小祥, 等. 面肌痉挛患者面听神经并发症发生情况及其相关危险因素分析[J]. 解放军预防医学杂志, 2019, 37(11): 88-89.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133