|
小学4~5年级社会情绪指标的结构和培养研究
|
Abstract:
通过对33名4~5年级学生进行关键行为事件访谈,建构了我国小学四五年级学生的社会情绪指标,研究结果表明:1) 采用BEI关键事件访谈法建构四五年级学生社会情绪指标,其指标的频次和最高等级分数受到访谈长度的影响,但平均数不受影响,且能区分高社会情绪水平和低社会情绪水平者,故采用平均数确定四五年级学生社会情绪指标具有稳定性。2) 交叉效度检验证实,感恩、积极心态、激情和坚持性这四个指标为四五年级学生的社会情绪健康指标;3) 采用团体焦点访谈法对社会情绪指标进行完善补充,发现抗逆力是四五年级学生关键的社会情绪指标;4) 基于社会情绪指标的确立,设计的干预方案能切实提高四五年级学生的社会情绪水平。研究从核心胜任特征角度探究小学高年级学生社会情绪的指标,为社会情绪的相关研究提供了实证支持,同时,对于开展小学生社会情绪的干预培养提供了一定的实践借鉴意义。
In this study, 33 students from grade 4 to 5 were chosen to conduct the Behavioral Event Interview to discuss the social emotion indicators of fourth or fifth grade students in China. The results showed that: 1) Using the Behavioral Event Interview to construct four or five grade students’ social emotional index here, index’s frequencies and maximal level of complexity were influenced by interview length, but there was no difference in average score. What’s more, average score could differentiate superstars and average performers. So using the average score to determine the social emotion indicators was more stability; 2) The results of cross validity confirm that gratitude, positive attitude, passion and persistence are the social emotional health indicators of grade 4 and 5 students; 3) The Focus Group Interview can be used to supplement the social emotional indicators of students in grades 4 and 5, and the measurement results show that resilience is a key social emotional indicator of students in grades 4 and 5; 4) Based on the index of social emotion, the designed intervention scheme can improve the social emotional level of 4 or 5 grade students. This study explored the indicators of social emotion of senior primary school students from the perspective of the theory of Competency Model, which provided empirical support for relevant studies on social emotion. Meanwhile, it also provided certain reference significance for carrying out the social emotion intervention training of primary school students in minority areas.
[1] | 陈猛, 车宏生, 王丽娜, 卞冉(2012). 情绪智力理论的整: 挑战、依据和方法. 北京师范大学学报(社会科学版), 3, 14-22. |
[2] | 陈权, 陆柳(2014). 美国社会情绪学习计划及在中学课堂实施策略研究. 外国中小学教育, (10), 20-25. |
[3] | 浦晓黎, 邹婷(2015). 美国社会情绪学习对我国大学生心理健康教育课程建设的启示. 高教学刊, (20), 21-23. |
[4] | 时勘(2006). 基于胜任特征模型的人力资源开发. 心理科学进展, 14(4), 586-595. |
[5] | 时勘, 王继承, 李超平(2002). 企业高层管理者胜任特征模型评价的研究. 心理学报, (3), 306-311. |
[6] | 宋乃庆, 王钦, 郭磊, 沈光辉(2020). 重大疫情对青少年非智力因素的影响及其教育应对. 西南大学学报(社会科学版), (4), 116-121. |
[7] | 田国秀(2007). 抗逆力研究及对我国学校心理健康教育的启示. 课程教材法, (3), 87-90. |
[8] | 徐文彬, 肖连群(2015). 论社会情绪学习的基本特征及其教育价值. 教育理论与实践, (13), 57-60. |
[9] | 许玭(2017). 学前儿童社会-情绪学习课程方案及其有效性研究. 博士学位论文, 上海: 上海师范大学. |
[10] | 曾晓滢, 原晋霞(2020). 美国学前儿童社会-情绪能力的培养策略——源自七个“casel select”课程的经验. 上海教科研, (1), 35-38. |
[11] | 仲理峰, 时勘(2003). 胜任特征研究的新进展. 南开管理评论, (2), 4-8. |
[12] | 仲理峰, 时勘(2004). 家族企业高层管理者胜任特征模型. 心理学报, 36(1), 110-115. |
[13] | Baron, R., & Parker, D. A. (2000). Handbook of Emotional Intelligence: Theory, Development, Assessment, and Application at Home, School and in the Workplace. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass. |
[14] | Bonanno, G. A. (2004). Loss, Trauma, and Human Resilience: Have We Underestimated the Human Capacity to Thrive after Extremely Aversive Events? American Psychologist, 59, 20-28. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.59.1.20 |
[15] | Fredrickson. B. (2009). Positivity: Groundbreaking Research Reveals How to Embrace the Hidden Strength of Positive Emotions, Overcome Negativity, and Thrive. Library Journal, 134, 84. |
[16] | Furlong, M. J. (2013). Preliminary Development of the Positive Experiences at School Scale for Elementary School Children. Child Indicators Research, 6, 753-775. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-013-9193-7 |
[17] | Goleman, D. (1998). The Emotionally Competent Leader. The Healthcare Forum Journal, 41, 36, 38, 76. |
[18] | Mayer, J. D., Salovey, P., & Caruso, D. R. (1999). Emotional Intelligence Meets Traditional Standards for an Intelligence. Intelligence, 27, 267-298. |
[19] | McClelland, D. C. (1973). Testing for Competence Rather than for “Intelligence”. American Psychologist, 28, 1-14.
https://doi.org/10.1037/h0034092 |
[20] | Spencer, L. M., & Spencer, S. M. (1993). Competence at Work: Models for Superior Performance. John Wiley &Sons. |
[21] | Walsh, E., & Isenberg, E. (2015). How Does Value Added Compare to Student Growth Percentiles? States & Public Policy, 2, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/2330443X.2015.1034390 |
[22] | Wang, C., Yang, C., Jiang, X., & Furlong, M. (2017). Validation of the Chinese Version of the Social Emotional Health Survey-Primary. International Journal of School & Educational Psychology, 6, 62-74.
https://doi.org/10.1080/21683603.2016.1272026 |