Aim: In prone breast treatments, a carbon fiber support device resides under the contralateral breast. Tangent beams are designed to encompass the
treated breast and these often pass through the board at a shallow angle,
resulting in significant attenuation. Our planners account for this attenuation
by adding field-in-field dose to the deep part of the breast, through the board. Concern
was raised about how accurate the treatment delivery is when the inherent uncertainties of patients’ positions are accounted for. Furthermore, transmissionmeasurements are usually
carried out perpendicular to the board, a non-clinical situation. The goal of this study is to
evaluate the dosimetric effect of theboard and the robustness of the plan to positional uncertainty. Materials
and Methods: Twenty-two breast patients treated on a commercial
prone breast board between 2017 and 2020 were selected for this
retrospective study. To evaluate the board’s attenuation, we compared the plans with the board removed from
the dose calculation. To quantify the robustness of this technique, we moved the beam isocenter
with respect to the patient and board. Results: Our results showed that when the breast board is removed from
a plan which was designed to account
for the board attenuation, the average point dose increases by 7.48%, with a maximum of 22%. Comparing results with a
mixed Analysis of
References
[1]
Merchant, T.E. and McCormick, B. (1994) Prone Position Breast Irradiation. International Journal of Radiation Oncology ∙ Biology ∙ Physics, 30, 197-203.
[2]
Algan, Ö. Fowble, B., McNeeley, S. and Fein, D. (1998) Use of the Prone Position in Radiation Treatment for Women with Early Stage Breast Cancer. International Journal of Radiation Oncology ∙ Biology ∙ Physics, 40, 1137-1140.
[3]
Grann, A., McCormick, B., Chabner, E.S., Gollamudi, S.V., Schupak, K.D., Mychalczak, B.R., Heerdt, A.S., Merchant, T.E. and Hunt, M.A. (2000) Prone Breast Radiotherapy in Early-Stage Breast Cancer: A Preliminary Analysis. International Journal of Radiation Oncology ∙ Biology ∙ Physics, 47, 319-325.
[4]
Buijsen, J., Jager, J.J., Bovendeerd, J., Voncken, R., Borger, J.H., Boersma, L.J., Murrer, L.H.P. and Lambin, P. (2007) Prone Breast Irradiation for Pendulous Breasts. Radio-therapy & Oncology, 82, 337-340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2006.08.014
[5]
Chino, J.P. and Marks, L.B. (2008) Prone Positioning Causes the Heart to Be Displaced Anteriorly within the Thorax: Implications for Breast Cancer Treatment. International Journal of Radiation Oncology ∙ Biology ∙ Physics, 70, 916-920.
[6]
Griem, K.L., Fetherston, P., Kuznetsova, M., Foster, G.S., Shott, S. and Chu, J. (2003) Three-Dimensional Photon Dosimetry: A Comparison of Treatment of the Intact Breast in the Supine and Prone Position. International Journal of Radiation Oncology ∙ Biology ∙ Physics, 57, 891-899.
[7]
Stegman, L.D., Beal, K.P., Hunt, M.A., Fornier, M.N. and McCormick, B. (2007) Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of Whole-Breast Irradiation Delivered in the Prone Position. International Journal of Radiation Oncology ∙ Biology ∙ Physics, 68, 73-81.
[8]
Ramella, S. EdyIppolito, L.T., Ippolito, E., Fiore, M., Cellini, F., Stimato, G., Gaudino, D., Greco, C., Ramponi, S. and Cammilluzzi, E., Cesarini, C., Piermattei, A., Cesario, A. and D'Angelillo, R.M. (2012) Whole-Breast Irradiation: A Subgroup Analysis of Criteria to Stratify for Prone Position Treatment. Medical Dosimetry, 37, 186-191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meddos.2011.06.010
[9]
Huppert, N., Jozsef, G., DeWyngaert, K., Formenti, S.C. (2011) The Role of a Prone Setup in Breast Radiation Therapy. Frontiers in Oncology, 1, 31. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2011.00031
[10]
Goodmn, K.A., Hong, L., Wagman, R., Hunt, et al. (2004) Dosimetric Analysis of a Simplified Intensity Modulation Technique for Prone Breast Radiotherapy. Interna-tional Journal of Radiation Oncology ∙ Biology ∙ Physics, 60, 95-102.
[11]
Veldeman, L., De Gersem, W., Speleers, B., et al. (2012) Alternated Prone and Supine Whole-Breast Irradiation Using IMRT: Setup Precision, Respiratory Movement and Treatment Time. International Journal of Radiation Oncology ∙ Biology ∙ Physics, 82, 2055-2064.
[12]
Kirby, A.M., Philips, M.E., Heyler, S.J., Donovan, E.M., Convery, H.M. and Yarnold, J.R. (2011) A Randomised Trial of Supine versus Prone Breast Radiotherapy (SuPr Study): Comparing Set-Up Errors and Respiratory Motion. Radiotherapy & Oncology, 100, 221-226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2010.11.005
[13]
Olch, A.J., Greig, L., Li, H., Mihaylov, I. and Morgan, A. (2014) Dosimetric Effects Caused by Couch Tops and Immobilization Devices: Report of AAPM Task Group 176. Medical Physics, 41, Article No. 061501. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4876299