全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

父母教养方式与初中生网络欺凌的关系:道德推脱的中介作用
The Relationship between Parenting Style and Cyberbullying of Junior Middle School Students: The Mediating Role of Moral Evasion

DOI: 10.12677/AP.2021.1110273, PP. 2395-2402

Keywords: 初中生,网络欺凌,父母教养方式,道德推脱
Junior Middle School Students
, Cyberbullying, Parenting Style, Moral Evasion

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

目的:为了发现民族地区初中生网络欺凌现象的特点规律,欲探讨父母教养方式、道德推脱、网络欺凌之间的关系,了解它们的现状和影响因素,为减少初中生的网络欺凌行为和降低道德推脱水平提供依据和建议。方法:采用分层随机抽样的方法对湖北省高平实验中学初一到初三558名学生进行问卷调查,采用SPSS、Mplus和Java对数据进行分析。结果:父母拒绝与网络欺凌(r = 0.22,p < 0.001)和道德推脱(r = 0.15,p < 0.01)均呈正相关,网络欺凌与道德推脱(r = 0.27,p < 0.001)呈正相关,在父母拒绝的教养方式与网络欺凌之间,道德推脱起部分中介效应,中介效应占总效应的38%。结论:道德推脱在父母拒绝与网络欺凌之间起部分中介效应。
Objective: In order to discover the characteristics and patterns of cyberbullying among junior middle school students in ethnic areas, this paper aims to explore the relationship among parenting style, moral evasion and cyberbullying, and to understand their current situation and the influence factors, and provide evidences and suggestions for reducing cyberbullying behavior and reducing the level of moral evasion in junior middle school students. Methods: In this study, a stratified random sampling method was used to survey 558 students from the first grade to the third grade of Gaoping Experimental Middle School in Hubei Province, and SPSS, Mplus, and Java were used to analyze the data. Results: Parental rejection was positively correlated with cyberbullying (r = 0.22, p < 0.001), and moral evasion (r = 0.15, p < 0.01). There was a positive correlation between cyberbullying and moral evasion (r = 0.27, p < 0.001). Between parental rejection and cyberbullying, part of the mediating effect is caused by moral evasion, which accounts for 38% of the total effect. Conclusion: Moral evasion has a partial mediating effect between parental rejection and cyberbullying.

References

[1]  陈桂敏(2013). 澳门青少年网络欺凌状况研究. 硕士学位论文, 武汉: 华中科技大学.
[2]  陈泳如, 胡佳佳(2012). 青少年网络成瘾与教养方式、社会支持相关研究. 中国健康心理学杂志, 20(5), 767-768.
[3]  褚晓伟, 范翠英, 柴唤友, 宋快(2016). 初中生受欺负与社交焦虑: 社会自我效能感的中介作用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 24(6), 1051-1054.
[4]  范翠英, 张孟, 何丹(2017). 父母控制对初中生网络欺负的影响: 道德推脱的中介作用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 25(3), 516-519+523.
[5]  何丹, 申曦, 杨欢, 范翠英(2017). 父母教养方式与青少年网络欺负: 移情的作用. 中国健康心理学杂志, 25(3), 403-407.
[6]  蒋奖(2004). 父母教养方式与青少年行为问题关系的研究. 健康心理学杂志, 12(1), 72-74.
[7]  蒋奖, 鲁峥嵘, 蒋苾菁, 许燕(2010). 简式父母教养方式问卷中文版的初步修订. 心理发展与教育, 26(1), 94-99.
[8]  矫凤楠(2017). 初中生父母控制、道德推脱与网络欺负的关系研究. 硕士学位论文, 太原: 山西大学.
[9]  金童林, 陆桂芝, 张璐, 范国沛, 李肖肖(2017). 儿童期心理虐待对大学生网络欺负的影响: 道德推脱的中介作用. 中国特殊教育, (2), 65-71.
[10]  宋明华, 陈晨, 刘燊, 李俊萱, 侯怡如, 张林(2017). 父母教养方式对初中生攻击行为的影响: 越轨同伴交往和自我控制的作用. 心理发展与教育, 33(6), 675-682.
[11]  孙新贞(2015). 大学生攻击态度和信念的结构及其与父母教养方式和攻击行为的关系. 硕士学位论文, 开封: 河南大学.
[12]  温忠麟, 张雷, 侯杰泰, 刘红云(2004). 中介效应检验程序及其应用. 心理学报, 36(5), 614-620.
[13]  杨继平, 王兴超, 高玲(2010). 道德推脱的概念、测量及相关变量. 心理科学进展, 18(4), 671-678.
[14]  张丽(2016). 大学生道德推脱、父母教养方式与攻击行为的关系研究. 硕士学位论文, 长沙: 湖南师范大学.
[15]  郑清, 叶宝娟, 姚媛梅, 陈佳雯, 符皓皓, 雷希, 游雅媛(2017). 攻击行为规范信念对大学生网络欺负的影响: 道德推脱与网络道德的中介作用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 25(4), 727-730.
[16]  郑清, 叶宝娟, 叶理丛, 郭少阳, 廖雅琼, 刘明矾(2016). 道德推脱对大学生网络攻击的影响: 道德认同的中介作用与性别的调节作用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 24(4), 714-716+683.
[17]  郑茹, 星一, 段佳丽(2017). 青少年网络欺凌行为流行及干预现状. 中国学校卫生, 38(6), 955-959.
[18]  周浩, 龙立荣(2004). 共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法. 心理科学进展, 12(6), 942-950.
[19]  Bussey, K., Fitzpatrick, S., & Raman, A. (2015). The Role of Moral Disengagement and Self-Efficacy in Cyberbullying. Journal of School Violence, 14, 30-46.
https://doi.org/10.1080/15388220.2014.954045
[20]  Dehue, F., Bolman, C., Vollink, T., & Pouwelse, M. (2012). Cyberbullying and Traditional Bullying in Relation to Adolescents’ Perception of Parenting. Journal of Cybertherapy and Rehabilitation (JCR), 5, 25-34.
[21]  Hodgdon, H. B. (2009). Child Maltreatment and Aggression: The Mediating Role of Moral Disengagement, Emotion Regulation, and Emotional Callousness among Juvenile Offenders. Dissertations & Theses, Gradworks, Temple University.
[22]  Jing, W., Iannotti, R. J., & Nansel, T. R. (2009). School Bullying among Adolescents in the United States: Physical, Verbal, Relational, and Cyber. Journal of Adolescent Health, 45, 368-375.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2009.03.021
[23]  Meter, D. J., & Bauman, S. (2018). Moral Disengagement about Cyberbullying and Parental Monitoring: Effects on Traditional Bullying and Victimization via Cyberbullying Involvement. Journal of Early Adolescence, 38, 303-326.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431616670752
[24]  Paciello, M., Fida, R., Tramontano, C., Lupinetti, C., & Caprara, G. V. (2008). Stability and Change of Moral Disengagement and Its Impact on Aggression and Violence in Late Adolescence. Child Development, 79, 1288-1309.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01189.x
[25]  Pelton, J., Gound, M., Forehand, R., & Brody, G. (2004). The Moral Disengagement Scale: Extension with an American Minority Sample. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 26, 31-39.
https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOBA.0000007454.34707.a5
[26]  Wong, C. Y. (2010). Cyber-Parenting: Internet Benefits, Risks and Parenting Issues. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 28, 252-273.
https://doi.org/10.1080/15228835.2011.562629
[27]  Ybarra, M. L., & Mitchell, K. J. (2004). Online Aggres-sor/Targets, Aggressors, and Targets: A Comparison of Associated Youth Characteristics. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45, 1308-1316.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2004.00328.x

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133