全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

小麦间作玉米和豆类对白粉病的控制效果
Control Effect of Intercropping Using Maize and Legumes against Wheat Powdery Mildew

DOI: 10.12677/HJAS.2021.1111135, PP. 1005-1012

Keywords: 生物多样性,物种多样性,小麦白粉病,间作
Biodiversity
, Species Diversity, Wheat Powdery Mildew, Intercropping

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

为明确基于物种多样性原理的小麦白粉病防控技术,2017~2019年,在农业部太原作物有害生物科学观测实验站,进行了小麦间作玉米和豆类作物控制小麦白粉病试验。结果表明,小麦间作玉米和豆类可以降低小麦白粉病发生过程病茎率和最终严重度。当单作区小麦白粉病病茎率达100%时,小麦间作玉米、青豆、黑豆的白粉病病茎率分别比单作小麦区下降61.25%、5.50%、14.00%。总体看,间作行数增加病茎率下降。间作玉米区和大豆区小麦旗叶严重度较单作区分别下降10.05%和10.37%,倒二叶严重度较单作区分别下降13.91%和20.49%,倒三叶严重度较单作区分别下降32.00%和32.21%。T检验表明,间作玉米区和单作区比较,小麦倒三叶严重度在0.05水平差异显著(p < 0.05)。旗叶和倒二叶差异不显著。间作大豆区和单作区比较,小麦倒二叶严重度在0.05水平差异显著(p < 0.05)。旗叶和倒三叶差异不显著。间作玉米区和间作大豆区相比,小麦上三叶严重度差异都不显著。干旱条件下间作玉米和间作大豆相比对小麦白粉病最终严重度的降低优势不突出。间作玉米区、大豆区较单作区对小麦白粉病的相对防效,旗叶为21.88%、22.58%,倒二叶为20.61%、30.36%,倒三叶为45.10%、45.39%。
In order to make clear the control effect of intercropping using maize and Legumes against wheat powdery mildew based on the principle of species diversity, in 2017~2019, at crop pest scientific observation and experiment station in Taiyuan, Ministry of Agriculture, disease control experiments of wheat intercropped with maize and legumes were carried out. The result showed that wheat intercropped with maize and legumes can reduce diseased stem rate in the process of occurrence and final severity of powdery mildew. When the diseased stem rate of wheat powdery mildew in monocropping plot reached 100%, the percentage of it in intercropping maize, green bean and black bean plot decreased by 61.25%, 5.50% and 14.00%, respectively. In general, the number of intercropping lines increased and the percentage of diseased stems decreased. Compared with monocropping plot, the severity of the flag leaf in intercropping maize plot and soybean plot decreased 10.05% and 10.37%, respectively. The severity of the second leaf decreased 13.91% and 20.49%, respectively. The severity of the third leaf decreased 32.00% and 32.21%, respectively. The t-test showed that the difference of severity of the third leaf between intercropping maize plot and monocropping plot was significant at 0.05 level (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference of the flag leaf and the second leaf of it. Comparing the intercropping soybean plot and monocropping plot, there was significant difference in severity between the second leaf at 0.05 level (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference of the flag leaf and the third leaf of it. Comparing the intercropping maize plot and intercropping soybean plot, the difference of severity was not significant. Under drought conditions, intercropped maize is compared to intercropped soybeans. The advantage of reducing the final severity of wheat powdery mildew was not obvious. Comparing the intercropping maize plot, soybean

References

[1]  朱有勇. 农业生物多样性控制作物病虫害的效应原理与方法[M]. 北京: 中国农业大学出版社, 2012: 37-39.
[2]  曹世勤. 甘肃省小麦品种抗条锈病和白粉病基因分析及应用[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 兰州: 甘肃农业大学, 2012: 98.
[3]  雷雨. 四川西南部小麦白粉病菌群体遗传多样性及间作对白粉病流行的影响[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 雅安: 四川农业大学, 2013: 27.
[4]  彭化贤, 刘波微, 罗林明, 等. 间栽和混播对作物病害的防治效果[J]. 西南农业学报, 2006, 19(6): 1058-1062.
[5]  乔鹏, 汤利, 郑毅, 等. 不同抗性小麦品种与蚕豆间作条件下的养分吸收与白粉病发生特征[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2010, 16(5): 1086-1093.
[6]  肖靖秀, 郑毅. 间套作系统中作物的养分吸收利用与病虫害控制[J]. 中国农学通报, 2005, 21(3): 150-154.
[7]  唐朝晖, 张兰萍, 赵桂萍, 等. 超高产小麦新品种晋麦66的选育[J]. 作物杂志, 2001(3): 43.
[8]  原宗英, 武英鹏. 山西省小麦区试品种抗病性鉴定[J]. 山西农业科学, 2016, 44(9): 1338-1341.
[9]  朱孝达. 田间试验与统计方法[M]. 重庆: 重庆大学出版社, 2000: 79, 195.
[10]  李隆, 金绍龄, 张丽惠, 等. 小麦/玉米带田中光捕获、利用及干物质积累特点[J]. 西北农业大学学报, 1996, 24(5): 42-48.
[11]  叶优良, 李隆, 索东让. 小麦/玉米和蚕豆/玉米间作对土壤硝态氮累积和氮素利用效率的影响[J]. 生态环境, 2008, 17(1): 377-383.
[12]  杜春凤, 曹瑾, 马琨, 等. 间套作栽培作物种间关系研究进展[J]. 农业科学研究, 2017, 38(2): 67-72.
[13]  李隆, 杨思存, 孙建好, 等. 小麦/大豆间作中作物种间的竞争作用和促进作用[J]. 应用生态学报, 1999, 10(2): 197-200.
[14]  陈国栋, 万素梅, 冯福学, 等. 带型对小麦间作玉米产量和种间竞争力的影响[J]. 西北农业学报, 2017, 26(7): 990-997.
[15]  林文. 作物复合群体结构与高产光合生理生态研究概况[J]. 福建稻麦科技, 2003, 21(4): 7-10.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133