|
碳酸盐岩岩溶储渗体描述及分类评价——以高石梯磨溪灯四气藏为例
|
Abstract:
与碎屑岩储层相比,碳酸盐岩储层受沉积作用、成岩作用及构造破碎作用等影响更严重、储层更具复杂性,储层评价难度大。为了更好地描述碳酸盐岩储层,引入储渗体的概念,以高石梯磨溪灯四气藏为例,根据测井曲线特征,在单井上将储渗体划分为纵向多层复合结构储渗体和单层结构储渗体两种类型,考虑到研究区灯四段上下两套溶洞系统的分布特征,将灯四上划为一个储渗体系,灯四下为一个储渗体系。依据储渗体内储层岩溶构型及孔隙度大小,对储渗体内部进行了分类评价,明确研究区储渗体分布规律;确定研究区储渗体定量评价标准,从定性和定量两个方面开展储渗体描述及分类评价。
Compared with clastic reservoir, carbonate reservoir is more seriously affected by sedimentation diagenesis and tectonic fracture, and the reservoir is more complicated and difficult to evaluate In order to better describe the carbonate reservoir, it introduces the concept of reservoir body, lamp with kaolinite ladder mill creek four gas reservoir as an example, according to the characteristics of the logging curves in the single well reservoir body will be divided into vertical multi-layer composite structure of reservoir permeability and single layer reservoir body two types, considering the four period of upper and lower two sets of lights in the study area the distribution features of the karst cave system, to light on the four as a system of reservoir permeability, light looking for A reserve-seepage system classifies and evaluates the interior of the reserve-seepage body according to the karst architecture and porosity of the reservoir in the reserve-seepage body, and defines the distribution law of the reserve-seepage body in the study area. The quantitative evaluation standard of reservoir and seepage body in the study area is determined, and the reservoir is carried out from two aspects of qualitative and quantitative.
[1] | 天工. 中国石油西南油气田公司蓬探1井震旦系天然气勘探获重大新突破[J]. 天然气工业, 2020, 40(5): 57. |
[2] | 徐春春, 沈平, 杨跃明, 等. 乐山–龙女寺古隆起震旦系–下寒武统龙王庙组天然气成藏条件与富集规律[J]. 天然气工业, 2014, 34(3): 1-7. |
[3] | 丁蓓蓓. 高石梯——磨溪灯四气藏岩溶储渗体分布规律研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 成都: 成都理工大学, 2019. |
[4] | 唐泽尧. 四川海相碳酸盐岩储层的类型和形成条件[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 1980(2): 21-33. |
[5] | 应维华. 陕甘宁盆地中部大气田古岩溶储层特征与含气性[J]. 江汉石油学院学报, 1995(2): 10-14+25. |
[6] | 王兴志, 穆曙光, 黄继祥, 等. 四川资阳地区灯影组气藏储渗体圈闭类型[J]. 中国海上油气: 地质, 1998(6): 386-389. |
[7] | 侯方浩, 方少仙, 沈昭国, 等. 白云岩体表生成岩裸露期古风化壳岩溶的规模[J]. 海相油气地质, 2005, 10(1): 19-30. |
[8] | 孟祥豪, 张哨楠, 李连波, 邓礼正. 鄂尔多斯北部塔巴庙地区奥陶系风化壳储渗体特征及分布[J]. 成都理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2006(3): 233-239. |
[9] | 闫海军, 贾爱林, 冀光, 等. 岩溶风化壳型含水气藏气水分布特征及开发技术对策——以鄂尔多斯盆地高桥区下古气藏为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(5): 801-811. |
[10] | 李清. 高石梯——磨溪地区龙王庙组碳酸盐岩储层测井评价方法研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 成都: 西南石油大学, 2015. |
[11] | 赵路子, 周彦, 谭秀成, 夏吉文, 吴昌龙, 李凌, 刘宏. 裂缝–孔隙型碳酸盐岩储层孔隙度下限的求解研究[J]. 成都理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2008(2): 127-132. |
[12] | 郝毅, 杨迅, 王宇峰, 等. 四川盆地震旦系灯影组表生岩溶作用研究[J]. 沉积与特提斯地质, 2017, 37(1): 48-54. |
[13] | 刘宏, 马腾, 谭秀成, 等. 表生岩溶系统中浅埋藏构造-热液白云岩成因——以四川盆地中部中二叠统茅口组为例[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2016, 43(6): 916-927. |
[14] | 何江, 方少仙, 侯方浩, 等. 风化壳古岩溶垂向分带与储集层评价预测——以鄂尔多斯盆地中部气田区马家沟组马五5-马五1亚段为例[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2013, 40(5): 534-542. |
[15] | 陈克勇, 等. 以古溶洞主导的白云岩岩溶储渗体分布模式[J]. 断块油气田, 2020, 27(1): 13-16. |
[16] | Canora, F., Fidelibus, D., et al. (2013) Coastal and Inland Karst Morphologies Driven by Sea Level Stands: A GIS Based Method for Their Evaluation. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 37, 1376-1386.
https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3246 |
[17] | Loucks, R.G. (1999) Paleocave Carbonate Reservoirs: Origins, Burial-Depth Modifications, Spatial Complexity, and Reservoir Implications. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, 83, 1795-1834.
https://doi.org/10.1306/E4FD426F-1732-11D7-8645000102C1865D |
[18] | 朱茂, 沈安江, 曾洪流, 李文正, 谷明峰, 田瀚. 古地貌恢复在岩溶风化壳储层研究中的应用——以川中磨溪地区灯影组四段为例[J]. 海相油气地质, 2018, 23(4): 87-95. |
[19] | 莫勇. 高石梯–磨溪震旦系灯四段碳酸盐岩储层特征研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 成都: 成都理工大学, 2017. |