全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Pricing Exotic Derivatives for Cryptocurrency Assets—A Monte Carlo Perspective

DOI: 10.4236/jmf.2021.114033, PP. 597-619

Keywords: Cryptocurrency, Monte Carlo Simulation, Lookback Options, Rough Volatili-ty, CCI30 Index

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

In the current paper, we develop a methodology to price lookback options for cryptocurrencies. We propose a discreetly monitored window average lookback option, whose monitoring frequencies are randomly selected within the time to maturity, and whose monitoring price is the average asset price in a specified window surrounding the instant. We price these options whose underlying asset is the CCI30 index of various Cryptocurrencies, as opposed to a single cryptocurrency, with the intention of reducing volatility, and thus, the option price. We employ the Normal Inverse Gaussian (NIG) and Rough Fractional Stochastic Volatility (RFSV) models to the cryptocurrency market, and using the Black-Scholes as the benchmark model. In doing so, we intend to capture the extreme characteristics such as jumps and volatility roughness for cryptocurrency price fluctuations. Since there is no availability of a closed-form solution for lookback option prices under these models, we utilize the Monte Carlo simulation for pricing, and augment it using the antithetic method for variance reduction. Finally, we present the simulation results for the lookback options, and compare the prices resulting from using the NIG model, RFSV model with those from the Black-Scholes model. We find that the option price is indeed lower for our proposed window average lookback option, than for a traditional lookback option. We found the Hurst parameter to be H=0.09 which confirms that the cryptocurrency market is indeed rough.

References

[1]  Barndimarte, P. (2002) Numerical Methods in Finance: A Matlab-Based Introduction. John Wiley & Sons, London.
[2]  Clewlow, C. and Strickland, L. (2003) Implementing Derivative Models. John Wiley & Sons, London.
[3]  Takaishi, T. (2020) Rough Volatility of Bitcoin. Finance Research Letters, 32, Article ID: 101379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2019.101379
[4]  Umeorah, N. (2017) Pricing Barrier and Look-Back Options. North-West University Thesis.
[5]  Chang, H.-C.H. and Li, K. (2018) The Amnesiac Lookback Option: Selectively Monitored Lookback Options and Cryptocurrencies. Frontiers in Applied Mathematics and Statistics, 4, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fams.2018.00010
[6]  Alfeus, M. (2013) Fast Pricing of Barrier Options. BSc Hons Thesis, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch.
[7]  Glasserman, P. (2004) Monte Carlo Methods in Financial Engineering. Springer, New York.
[8]  Saebo, K.K. (2009) Pricing Exotic Options with NIG Model Using Path Integration. Thesis Report, Norwegian University of Science & Technology, Trondheim.
[9]  Black, F. and Scholes, M. (1973) The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities. Journal of Political Economy, 81, 637-654. https://doi.org/10.1086/260062
[10]  Comte, F. and Renault, E. (1998) Long Memory in Continuous-Time Stochastic Volatility Models. Mathematical Finance, 8, 291-323.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9965.00057
[11]  Gatheral, J.J., Jaisson, T. and Rosenbaum, M. (2018) Volatility Is Rough. Quantitative Finance, 18, 933-949. https://doi.org/10.1080/14697688.2017.1393551
[12]  Hosking, J.R.M. (1984) Modeling Persistence in Hydrological Time Series Using Fractional Differencing. Water Resources Research, 20, 1898-1908.
https://doi.org/10.1029/WR020i012p01898
[13]  Chen, L., Gao, R., Bian, Y. and Di, H. (2021) Elliptic Entropy of Uncertain Random Variables with Application to Portfolio Selection. Soft Computing, 25, 1925-1937.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-020-05266-z
[14]  Chen, L., Peng, J., Zhang, B. and Rosyida, I. (2017) Diversified Models for Portfolio Selection Based on Uncertain Semivariance. International Journal of Systems Science, 48, 637-648. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207721.2016.1206985
[15]  Gross, P. (2006) Parameter Estimation for Black-Scholes Equation. Technical Report.
[16]  Alfeus, M., Overbeck, L. and Schlogl, E. (2019) Regime Switching Rough Heston Model. The Journal of Futures Markets, 39, 538-552.
https://doi.org/10.1002/fut.21993

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133