全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Comparative Analysis of Conventional Anaerobic Digestion and Bio-Electrochemical Systems in Waste Organics Utilization

DOI: 10.4236/jacen.2021.104028, PP. 428-435

Keywords: Renewable Energy, Microbial Fuel Cell, Anaerobic Digestion, Wastewater Treatment

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Anaerobic digestion is often used as an approach to deal with high COD waste streams. Compared to the aeration systems it allows better energy management due to the biogas production but also has several limitations including inlet waste streams quality and the additional equipment required for energy harvesting. In recent years, the bio-electrochemical systems (BES) and processes are intensively studied as a method for organic waste utilization, including wastewater. They potentially could bring several benefits to the wastewater treatment, mainly due to avoiding aeration (and aeration cost) and direct energy recovering in the form of electricity. Besides their anaerobic nature, the biological processes in BES are respiration-like contrary to the fermentative degradation typical for conventional anaerobic digestion which eventually will provide better mineralization and higher efficiency in terms of COD and BOD removal in such reactors. This study is a direct comparison between conventional anaerobic digestion and Microbial Fuel Cell (as a typical BES reactor) during utilization of wastewater from industrial production of ethanol by fermentation. COD removal rates and dynamics, energy recovery properties and parameters such as secondary sludge production are investigated in order to characterize the feasibility and technological readiness of BES as a step towards their commercialization.

References

[1]  Hussey, K. and Pittock, J. (2012) The Energy-Water Nexus: Managing the Links between Energy and Water for a Sustainable Future. Ecology and Society, 17, 31-39.
https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-04641-170131
[2]  Heidrich, E.S., Curtis, T.P. and Dolfing, J. (2001) Determination of the Internal Chemical Energy of Wastewater. Environmental Science & Technology, 45, 827-832.
https://doi.org/10.1021/es103058w
[3]  Lee, S.Y., Sankaran, R., Chew, K.W., Tan, C.H., Krishnamoorthy, R., Chu, D.-T. and Shown, P.-L. (2019) Waste to Bioenergy: A Review on the Recent Conversion Technologies. BMC Energy, 1, Article No. 4.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s42500-019-0004-7
[4]  Appels, L., Baeyens, J., Degrève, J. and Dewil, R. (2008) Principles and Potential of the Anaerobic Digestion of Waste-Activated Sludge. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 34, 755-781.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2008.06.002
[5]  Fytili, D. and Zabaniotou, A. (2008) Utilization of Sewage Sludge in EU Application of Old and New Methods—A Review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 12, 116-140.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2006.05.014
[6]  Luque, R., Menéndez, J.A., Arenillas, A. and Cot, J. (2012) Microwave-Assisted Pyrolysis of Biomass Feedstocks: The Way Forward? Energy & Environmental Science, 5, 5481-5488.
https://doi.org/10.1039/C1EE02450G
[7]  Horváth, I.S., Tabatabaei, M., Karimi, K. and Kumar, R. (2016) Recent Updates on Biogas Production—A Review. Biofuels Research Journal, 10, 394-402.
https://doi.org/10.18331/BRJ2016.3.2.4
[8]  Kumar, V., Bhatia, A., Kubota, K. and Rajpal, A. (2021) Environmental Technology & Innovation Microbial Community Dynamics in Anaerobic Digesters Treating Organic Fraction of Municipal Solid Waste. Environmental Technology & Innovation, 21, Article ID: 101303.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2020.101303
[9]  Roubík, H., Mazancová, J., Banout, J. and Verner, V. (2016) Addressing Problems at Small-Scale Biogas Plants: A Case Study from Central Vietnam. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 2784-2792.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.114
[10]  Anukam, A., Mohammadi, A., Naqvi, M. AND Granstrom, K. (2019) A Review of the Chemistry of Anaerobic Digestion: Methods of Accelerating and Optimizing Process Efficiency. Processes, 7, 504-523.
https://doi.org/10.3390/pr7080504
[11]  Tyagi, V.K., Bhatia, K., Kubota, K., Rajpal, A., Ahmed, B., Khan, A.A., Kazmi, A.A. and Kumar, M. (2021) Microbial Community Dynamics in Anaerobic Digesters Treating Organic Fraction of Municipal Solid Waste. Environmental Technology & Innovation, 21, 101303.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2020.101303
[12]  Dosta, J., Galí, A., Macé, S. and Mata-álvarez, J. (2007) Modelling a Sequencing Batch Reactor to Treat the Supernatant from Anaerobic Digestion of the Organic Fraction of Municipal Solid Waste. Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology, 82, 158-164.
https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.1645
[13]  Talbot, J.M. and Treseder, K.K. (2012) Interactions among Lignin, Cellulose, and Nitrogen Drive Litter Chemistry–Decay Relationships. Ecology, 93, 345-354.
https://doi.org/10.1890/11-0843.1
[14]  Venkata, M.S. (2012) Harnessing Bioelectricity through Microbial Fuel Cell from Wastewater. Renew Energy, 5, 24-28.
[15]  Sun, G.T., Thygesen, A. and Meyer, A.S. (2015) Acetate Is a Superior Substrate for Microbial Fuel Cell Initiation Preceding Bioethanol Effluent Utilization. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 99, 4905-4915.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-015-6513-5
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00253-015-6513-5
[16]  Min, B. and Logan, B.E. (2004) Continuous Electricity Generation from Domestic Wastewater and Organic Substrates in a Flat Plate Microbial Fuel Cell. Environmental Science & Technology, 38, 5809-5814.
https://doi.org/10.1021/es0491026

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133