The Anaerobic digestion in Senegal is of particular interest to the
scientific community given the availability
of substrates and their distribution throughout the country. However,
from a technological point of view, the existing installations seem to be
obsolete, which does not allow to reproduce the results of the laboratory
tests. Thus, the present study aims to take stock of the situation in relation
to the studies carried out in laboratories and those concerning the actual
monitoring of the bio-digesters insitu. In fact, most experimental
bio-digesters operate under optimal implementation conditions with strict control
of input and output parameters. However, this is not the case for reactors
installed in the field, as these so-called bio-digesters are exposed to real environmental conditions with a periodic
variation of the physic-chemical parameters in the reactors throughout
the day. This leads to a differential behavior of the micro-organisms, thus
affecting their performance. This results in lower yields for those digesters
operating under real environmental conditions.
References
[1]
Colin, H. (1993) Thies: L4abattoir fertilise au lieu de polluer. Spore 47. CTA. Wageningen, The Netherlands.
[2]
Minister of Energy of Senegal (2021) ARRETE MINISTERIEL n˚ 12100 en date du 30 décembre 2009 portant création, organisation et fonctionnement du Programme National de Biogaz domestique du Sénégal (PNB-SN). http://www.jo.gouv.sn/spip.php?article7948,consultation
[3]
Fall, M. (2018) Caracterisation physico-chimique et valorisation energetique des dechets solides pour la region de Dakar. Thèse de doctorat Universite Cheikh Anta Diop de Dakar.
[4]
ONAS Rapport Final Biogz (2013) Etude d’etablissement d’une base de reference pour le projet biogas.
[5]
Kim, M. and Speece, R.E. (2002) Comparative Process Stability and Efficiency of Anaerobic Digestion; Mesophilic vs. Thermophilic. Water Research, 36, 4369-4385. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(02)00147-1
[6]
Dana, R. (2010) Macro-Scale Biogas Production: A Beginners Guide. The National Sustainable Agriculture Information Service, ATTRA. https://attra.ncat.org/
[7]
Labatut, R.A., Angenent, L.T. and Scott, N.R. (2014) Conventional Mesophilic vs. Thermophilic Anaerobic Digestion: A Trade-Off between Performance and Stability? Water Research, 53, 249-258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2014.01.035
[8]
Zennaki-Bensouda, Z., Zaid,,A., Lamini, H., Aubineau, M. and Boulil, M. (1996) Fermentation méthanique des déchets de bovins: étude du temps de retention hydraulique, de la temperature et de la concentration en substrat. Traopicultura, 14, 134-140.
[9]
Fulford, D. (1998) Running a Biogas Programme, a Hand Book. “How Biogas Works”. Intermediate Technol Publication, London, pp. 33-34.
[10]
Morau, D. (2006) Modélisation des dispositifs de revalorisation énergétique des déchets solides et liquides: séchage, méthanisation, incinération: mise en oeuvre d’un outil d’aide à la conception multisystèmes et multi-modèles. Mécanique [physics.med-ph]. Université de la Réunion, Français.
[11]
Kebe, N.N., Fall, P.A., Ndiaye, D. and Diouf, D. (2019) Residues of the Transformation of Halieutics Products: An Alternative Substrate for Energy Valorization of Wastes by Methanisation for a Local Sustainable Development (Preliminary Results). African Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 13, 291-295. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJEST2018.2549
[12]
Faye, O.K., Ndiaye, L.G. and Sarr, B. (2020) étude comparative de la digestion anaérobie entre pulpes de la pomme de cajou, bouse de vache et leur codigestion. SOAPHYS, 2, C20A05-1 à C20A05-8. https://doi.org/10.46411/jpsoaphys.2020.01.05 www.soaphys.org/journal
[13]
ADEME (2014) Guide complet à destination des exploitants d’unités méthanisation. ADEME Bourgogne, p5-12.
[14]
American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers (2011) Manure Storage Safety, ASABE EP470 JAN1992 (R2005). American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, Joseph.
[15]
American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers (2010) Ventilating Manure Storages to Reduce Entry Risk, ANSI/ASABE S607 OCT2010 (R2019). American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, Joseph.
[16]
Ministère du Travail de l’Ontario (2009) Directives concernant la santé et la sécurité au travail à l’intention des opérations agricoles en Ontario, Section 7: Atmosphères dangereuses et espaces exigus.
[17]
Ministère du Travail de l’Ontario (2011) Alerte I33: Dangers atmosphériques associés aux silos hermétiques dans les exploitations agricoles.
[18]
Patni, N.K. and Clarke, S.P. (2003) Gaseous Emissions in Swine Barns and during Slurry Mixing in Sub-Floor Pits, ASAE Meeting Paper Number 034081. American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, Joseph.
