|
团结水库浮游植物功能群及营养水平研究
|
Abstract:
为了研究团结水库浮游植物功能群季节演替特征及其影响因子,分别于2020年9月(秋季)、2021年5月(春季)、7月(夏季)对团结水库设置的5个采样点进行浮游植物采样分析,共鉴定出浮游植物6门,划分为16个功能群,分别为C、D、F、H1、J、L0、M、MP、N、P、S1、W1、W2、X1、X2、Y。团结水库浮游植物功能群季节变化呈现为M + P → M + Y → D + F + P + W1 + Y的变化特征。运用冗余分析(RDA)探究浮游植物功能群与环境因子间的关系,结果表明,团结水库浮游植物功能群受水环境因子影响较为显著,其中,水深(Depth)、透明度(SD)、pH值、总磷(TP)、氯离子(Cl?)、化学需氧量(CODMn)是影响浮游植物功能群分布的主要环境因子。团结水库水体中透明度(SD)、总氮(TN)、总磷(TP)、叶绿素(Chla)等指标均远超水体富营养化最低标准,表明该水库呈富营养化状态。
In order to study the seasonal succession characteristics and influencing factors of phytoplankton functional groups in Tuanjie Reservoir, phytoplankton samples were analyzed in 5 sampling sites in September 2020 (autumn), May 2021 (spring) and July 2021 (summer), respectively. Six phyla of phytoplankton were identified, and they were divided into 16 functional groups: C, D, F, H1, J, L0, M, MP, N, P, S1, W1, W2, X1, X2, and Y. The seasonal variation of the Phytoplankton functional group in Tuanjie Reservoir is characterized by M + P → M + Y → D + F + P + W1 + Y. Redundancy analysis (RDA) was used to explore the relationship between phytoplankton functional groups and environmental factors, and the results showed that the phytoplankton functional groups were significantly affected by water environmental factors, and the water depth (Depth), transparency (SD), pH, total phosphorus (TP), chloride ion (Cl?) and chemical oxygen demand (CODMn) were the main environmental factors that affected the distribution of phytoplankton functional groups. The values of transparency (SD), total nitrogen (TN), total phosphorus (TP) and chlorophyll (Chla) in Tuanjie Reservoir were all higher than the minimum standards of eutrophication. These indicate that the reservoir is in an eutrophication state.
[1] | 王帅帅, 王博涵, 韩洁, 等. 济南南部山区夏季水域浮游植物功能群分析[J]. 河北渔业, 2017(5): 24-25, 30. |
[2] | Padisak, J., Crossetti, L.O. and Naselli-Flores, L. (2009) Use and Misuse in the Application of the Phytoplankton Functional Classification: A Critical Review with Updates. Hydrobiologia, 621, 1-19.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-008-9645-0 |
[3] | 陆欣鑫, 刘妍, 范亚文. 呼兰河湿地夏、秋两季浮游植物功能分组演替及其驱动因子[J]. 生态学报,2014, 34(5): 1264-1273. |
[4] | 唐毅, 郑永华, 刘建虎, 等. 横江中下游春季浮游植物群落结构及多样性分析[J]. 淡水渔业, 2016, 46(1): 51-58. |
[5] | Reynolds, C.S., Huszar, V., Kruk, C., et al. (2002) Towards a Functional Classification of the Freshwater Phytoplankton. Journal of Plankton Research, 24, 417-428. https://doi.org/10.1093/plankt/24.5.417 |
[6] | 郑诚, 陆开宏, 徐镇, 等. 四明湖水库浮游植物功能类群的季节演替及其影响因子[J]. 环境科学, 2018, 39(6): 2688-2697. |
[7] | Mac, X., Chula Mwagona, P., Yu, H.X., et al. (2019) Spatial and Temporal Variation of Phytoplankton Functional Groups in Extremely Alkaline Dali Nur Lake, North China. Journal of Freshwater Ecology, 34, 91-105.
https://doi.org/10.1080/02705060.2018.1554545 |
[8] | 钱奎梅, 刘宝贵, 陈宇炜. 鄱阳湖浮游植物功能群的长期变化特征(2009~2016年) [J]. 湖泊科学, 2019, 31(4): 1035-1044. |
[9] | 张新月, 郑涛, 龙剑锋, 等. 尔王庄水库浮游植物功能群初步研究[J]. 江西水产科技, 2020(1): 15-16. |
[10] | 陈倩, 吴琼, 罗欢. 太湖水库蓄水前后浮游植物群落结构特征[J]. 生态科学, 2020, 39(6): 75-82. |
[11] | 张俊芳, 胡晓红, 马沛明, 等. 汤浦水库浮游植物功能群季节演替及关键驱动因子[J]. 2021, 42(3): 55-61. |
[12] | 高国敬, 肖利娟, 林秋奇, 等. 海南省典型水库浮游植物功能类群的结构特征与水质评价[J]. 生态科学, 2013, 32(2): 144-150. |
[13] | Shen, H., Li, B., Cai, Q., et al. (2014) Phytoplankton Functional Groups in a High Spatial Heterogeneity Subtropical Reservoir in China. Journal of Great Lakes Research, 40, 859-869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jglr.2014.09.007 |
[14] | Padisak, J., Borics, G., Grigorszky, I., et al. (2006) Use of Phytoplankton Assemblages for Monitoring Ecological Status of Lakes within the Water Framework Directive: The Assemblage Index. Hydrobiologia, 553, 1-14. |
[15] | 夏莹霏, 胡晓东, 徐季雄, 等. 太湖浮游植物功能群季节演替特征及水质评价[J]. 湖泊科学, 2019, 31(1): 134-146. |
[16] | Dembowska, E.A., Napiórkowski, P., Mieszczankin, T., et al. (2015) Planktonic Indices in the Evaluation of the Ecological Status and the Trophic State of the Longest Lake in Poland. Ecological Indicators, 56, 15-22.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.03.019 |
[17] | Crossetti, L.O. and de Bicudo, M.C.E. (2008) Phytoplankton as a Monitoring Tool in a Tropical Urban Shallow Reservoir (Gar?as Pond): The Assemblage Index Application. Hydrobiologia, 610, 161-173.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-008-9431-z |
[18] | 孙作雷, 李亚男, 俞洁, 等. 浙江省6大重点水库生态服务功能价值评估[J]. 浙江大学学报(理学版), 2015, 42(3): 353-358, 364. |
[19] | 彭秀莲, 黄鸿君, 李冬林, 等. 重要水库水源地生态服务价值评估——以株树桥水库为例[J]. 人民珠江, 2020, 41(1): 111-116. |
[20] | Sun, X., Chai, H.X, et al. (2019) Seasonal Variations of Zooplankton Functional Groups and Relationship with Environmental Factors in a Eutrophic Reservoir from Cold Region. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research, 17, 7727-7740. https://doi.org/10.15666/aeer/1704_77277740 |
[21] | 汪梦琪, 汪金成, 王琪, 等. 洞庭湖区平水期浮游生物群落结构特征及富营养化现状[J]. 生态学杂志, 2018, 301(8): 193-204. |
[22] | 胡鸿钧, 魏印心. 中国淡水藻类——系统、分类及生态[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2006. |
[23] | 韩曦, 王丽, 周平, 等. 淮河(安徽段)南岸诸河流水质标识指数评价[J]. 湿地科学, 2012, 10(1): 46-57. |
[24] | 金相灿, 屠清瑛. 湖泊富营养化调查规范[M]. 第2 版. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 1990: 291-303. |
[25] | 舒金华. 我国湖泊富营养化程度评价方法的探讨[J]. 环境污染与治理, 1990(5): 2-7. |
[26] | 孙清展, 臧淑英, 张囡囡, 等. 基于蒙特卡罗方法的扎龙湿地水环境质量评价[J]. 湿地科学, 2013, 11(1): 75-81. |
[27] | 况琪军, 胡征宇, 周广杰, 等. 香溪河流域浮游植物调查与水质评价[J]. 武汉植物学研究, 2004, 22(6): 507-513. |
[28] | 王岳, 夏爽, 裴国凤. 长江干流湖北段浮游藻类群落结构特征[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2015, 31(6): 916-922. |
[29] | 李庆南, 赵文, 殷旭旺, 等. 辽河太子河水系的浮游植物种类多样性研究[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2011, 26(4): 322-327. |
[30] | 王博涵, 李文香, 项珍龙, 等. 济南地区河流浮游植物功能群与环境因子的关系[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2015, 30(5): 524-530. |
[31] | 李俊龙, 郑丙辉, 刘录三, 等. 长江口浮游植物群落结构特征及其与环境的响应关系[J]. 环境科学研究, 2013, 26(4): 403-409. |