Pre-Service Teachers’ Evaluation of Teaching and Learning of Core Courses in Regular and Distance Education Programmes in Ghanaian Colleges of Education
Almost all pre-service
teachers from Colleges of Education in Ghana, whether from the regular or
distance mode, teach in the basic schools. This research employed survey to
examine pre-service teachers’ evaluation of teaching (ET) on teaching and
learning in the regular and distance modes of teacher education in Ghana. The
analytical cross-sectional survey design was adopted for the study. Four hundred and fifty-five (455)
pre-service teachers of Accra College of Education and the College of
Distance Education at Papafio Hills, both of University of Cape Coast were used
as the sample for the survey. Questionnaire of Cronbach’s alpha coefficient (α) of 0.81 was used to solicit
views regarding students’ evaluation of teaching and learning. Frequency and
percentages were used to describe the data. They have the belief that tutors
are competent in subject matter knowledge, pedagogy and assessment.
Empirically, tutors’ knowledge of subject matter was rated ‘good’ by majority
of distance (89.57%) and regular (51.17%) students. Organization of lessons by
the college tutors was also judged as good by majority of the distance (73.07%)
and regular (61.67%) students. Teacher assessment by college tutors was rated “good”
and constructive by majority (66.0%) of the distance students, and a few
regular students (36.8%). Similarly, pre-service teachers in the two colleges
have positive self-efficacy in learning. Evidence from the study shows that,
majority of the male (64.56%) and female (53.25%) students in the distance mode
as well as female students in the regular mode (52.25%) did not find it
stressful using mathematics and science textbooks to work on homework, except a
few male students (48.41%) in the regular mode. Pre-service teachers have the
belief that College of Education tutors in Ghana are competent in subject
matter knowledge and pedagogy to teach in both regular and distance education
programmes. Pre-service teachers in Ghanaian College of Education have
self-efficacy in learning core courses in regular and distance education
programmes. This study concludes that distance education programmes are equally
effective and efficient means of education and training of pre-service teachers
in Ghana just as the regular or traditional mode of teacher education and training. It is therefore recommended that, policy
makers including the Ministry of Education and the National Council on
Tertiary Education in liaison with Ghanaian universities should give similar attention
to distance
References
[1]
Allen, M., Bourhis, J., Burrell, N., & Mabry, E. (2002). Comparing Student Satisfaction with Distance Education to Traditional Classrooms in Higher Education: A Meta-Analysis. American Journal of Distance Education, 16, 83-97. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15389286AJDE1602_3
[2]
Bailleul, P., Bataille, A., Langlois, C., Lanoe, P., & Mazereau, P. (2008). From Disabled Pupils’ Integration to Inclusive Schooling: Current Situation and New Teacher Training Needs. An Unpublished Research Report, Université de Caen Basse-Normandie.
[3]
Ball, D. L., Sleep, L., Boerst, T., & Bass, H. (2009). Combining the Development of Practice and the Practice of Development in Teacher Education. Elementary School Journal, 109, 458-474. https://doi.org/10.1086/596996
[4]
Bernard, R. M., Abrami, P. C., Lou, Y., Borokhovski, E., Wade, A., Wozney, L., & Huang, B. (2004). How Does Distance Education Compare with Classroom Instruction? A Meta-Analysis of the Empirical Literature. Review of Educational Research, 74, 379-439. https://doi.org/10.3102%2F00346543074003379
[5]
Cavanaugh, C. S. (2001). The Effectiveness of Interactive Distance Education Technologies in K-12 Learning: A Meta-Analysis. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 7, 73-88.
[6]
Crankson, S., Agyeman, K. D., & Narh-Kert, M. (2020). Pre-Service Teachers’ Perception of Their Mathematics Classroom Environment in Ghanaian Colleges of Education. American Journal of Educational Research, 8, 739-745.
[7]
Cybinski, P., & Selvanathan, S. (2005). Learning Experience and Learning Effectiveness in Undergraduate Statistics: Modelling Performance in Traditional and Flexible Learning Environments. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 3, 251-271. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4609.2005.00069.x
[8]
Deka, T. S., & McMurry, P. (2006). Student Success in Face-to-Face and Distance Teleclass Environments: Matter of Contact? International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 7, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v7i1.251
[9]
Machtmes, K., & Asher, J. W. (2000). A Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness of Telecourses in Distance Education. The American Journal of Distance Education, 14, 27-46. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923640009527043
[10]
Narh-Kert, M. (2020). Predictive Validity of Entry Level Mathematics on Mathematical Knowledge of Pre-Service Teachers for Teaching Basic School mathematics in Ghana. Texila International Journal of Academic Research, 7, 17-28. https://doi.org/10.21522/TIJAR.2014.07.02.Art003
[11]
Narh-Kert, M., & Ampadu, E. (2020). Assessing Factors Influencing Pre-Service Teachers’ Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching (MKT) Mathematics in Ghanaian Basic Schools. Texila International Journal of Academic Research, 7, 46-60. https://doi.org/10.21522/TIJAR.2014.07.01.Art004
[12]
Narh-Kert, M., & Ampadu, E. (2021). Statistical Modelling of the Academic Performance of Pre Service Teachers of Regular and Distance Education in Ghana. Psychology and Education Journal, 58, 1948-1957.
[13]
Narh-Kert, M., Agyeman, K. D., & Crankson, S. (2021). Attitude towards Mathematics: The Case of Pre-Service Mathematics Teachers in Selected Colleges of Education in Ghana. Social Science Learning Education Journal, 6. https://doi.org/10.15520/sslej.v6i2.2769
[14]
Ramage, T. R. (2002). The “No Significant Difference” Phenomenon: A Literature Review. http://spark.parkland.edu/ramage_pubs/1/
[15]
Savolainen, H. (2009). Responding to Diversity and Striving for Excellence: The Case of Finland. PROSPECTS, 39, 281-292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-009-9125-y
[16]
Schoenfeld-Tacher, R., McConnell, S., & Graham, M. (2001). Do No Harm: A Comparison of the Effects of On-Line vs. Traditional Delivery Media on a Science Course. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 10, 257-265. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016690600795
[17]
Shachar, M., & Neumann, Y. (2003). Differences between Traditional and Distance Education. Academic Performance: A Meta-Analytic Approach, 4, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v4i2.153
[18]
Tucker, S. Y. (2000). Assessing the Effectiveness of Distance Education versus Traditional On-Campus Education. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, 24-28 April 2000.
[19]
Zhao, Y., Lei, J., Yan, B., & Tan, S. (2004). What Makes the Difference? A Practical Analysis of Research on the Effectiveness of Distance Education. Teachers College Record, 107, 1836-1884.