全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Real Facts about Safety and Efficacy of Zinc Oxide and Titanium Dioxide in Solar Products

DOI: 10.4236/jcdsa.2021.113021, PP. 253-262

Keywords: TiO2, ZnO, UV-Radiations, Human Skin, UVA-PF, Resorption, Cutaneous Penetration, Franz Cell, New in Vitro Methodology

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Background: Titanium dioxide and zinc oxide were often criticized over the last decade because of their supposed noxious effects on human health. Moreover, these compounds which are frequently introduced in sunscreen products as UV filter, are sometimes associated with poor UVA protection factors. So, in order to clarify the real efficacy and safety status of these products, we provide here some bibliographic and experimental data regarding 1) their “real” protective effect against UVA rays and 2) their real harmful effects on human skin notably by studying their capability to penetrate through the human cutaneous tissue. Materials and Methods: We studied here 4 sunscreen products containing titanium dioxide and zinc oxide for 3 of them. First, because the UVA-PF values obtained for these compounds by using the “classical” in vitro ISO 24443 procedure seem to be significantly different from to those obtained by using the in vivo method ISO 24442, we chose to develop a new in vitro methodology in order to more precisely define the UVA-PF of titanium and zinc oxides. This new methodology was then used to lead UVA-PF studies with the 4 selected solar products. We also provide here an evaluation of the toxicological effects of titanium and zinc oxides on human skin based on the SCCS reports and analysis of recent and relevant bibliographic studies. Moreover, as the harmful effects of this type of products are closely linked to their ability to penetrate cutaneous tissue, we tested 7 sunscreen products to precise the skin penetration profiles of titanium dioxide and zinc oxide by using human skin explants mounted on Franz cells. Results: We here demonstrated that our new in vitro methodology gave some UVA-PF values very close to those obtained with in vivo methods and we took advantage of it to define more realistic UVA-PF for titanium dioxide and zinc oxide. Additionally, we here evaluated the human skin permeation and resorption capacities of titanium dioxide and zinc oxide incorporated in the 7 tested products. As it was defined by World Health Organization (WHO) in 2005, permeation consists in the ability for a compound to penetrate into different layers of a tissue, and the resorption consists in the absorption of this compound into the vascular system. In our experimental conditions, we showed 1) that zinc oxide and titanium dioxide permeations did not exceed 8.5 and 5.5 μg/cm2 of skin respectively (i.e. 0.89% and 0.26% of the applied

References

[1]  Sondenheimer, K. and Krutmann, J. (2018) Novel Means for Photoprotection. Frontiers in Medicine, 5, 162-167. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2018.00162
[2]  de Gruijl, F.R. (1998) Adverse Effects of Sunlight on the Skin. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde, 142, 620-625.
[3]  D’Orazio J., Jarrett S., Amaro-Ortiz A. and Scott T. (2013) UV Radiation and the Skin. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 14, 12222-12248. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms140612222
[4]  Shauder, S. and Ippen, H. (1997) Contact and Photocontact Sensitivity to Sunscreens: Review of a 15-Year Experience and of the Literature. Contact Dermatitis, 37, 221-232. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.1997.tb02439.x
[5]  Maier, T. and Korting, H. (2005) Sunscreens—Which and What for? Skin Pharmacology and Physiology, 18, 253-262. https://doi.org/10.1159/000087606
[6]  Hedayat, K., Ahmad Nasrollahi, S., Firooz, A., Rastegar, H. and Dadgarnejad, M. (2020) Comparison of UVA Protection Factor Measurement Protocols. Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology, 13, 351-358. https://doi.org/10.2147/CCID.S244898
[7]  Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (2021) The SCCS Notes of Guidance for the Testing of Cosmetic Ingredients and Their Safety Evaluation, 11th Revision. European Commission, Brussels.
[8]  Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (2012) Opinion on Zinc Oxide (Nano Form). COLIPA 76S. SCCS/1489/12. Revision of 11 December 2012.
[9]  Kielhorn, J., Melching-Kollmu, S., Mangelsdorf, I. and WHO (World Health Organisation) (2005) Dermal Absorption. WHO/IPCS Environmental Health Criteria, Draft February. http://www.who.int/ipcs/methods/dermal_absorption/en/
[10]  Moesch, C. (2007) Use of ICP-MS in Clinical Biology. Annales de Toxicologie Analytique, 19, 11-21. https://doi.org/10.1051/ata:2007003
[11]  Schneider, S. and Lim, H. (2019) A Review of Inorganic Filters Zinc Oxide and Titanium Dioxide. Photodermatology, Photoimmunology & Photomedicine, 35, 442-446. https://doi.org/10.1111/phpp.12439
[12]  Vujovic, M. and Kostic, E. (2019) Titanium Dioxide and Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles in Sunscreens: A Review of Toxicological. Journal of Cosmetic Science, 70, 223-234.
[13]  Smijs, T. and Pavel, S. (2011) Titanium Dioxide and Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles in Sunscreens: Focus on Their Safety and Effectiveness. Nanotechnology, Science and Applications, 4, 95-112. https://doi.org/10.2147/NSA.S19419
[14]  Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (2012) The SCCS Notes of Guidance for the Testing of Cosmetic Ingredients and Their Safety Evaluation, 11th Revision. European Commission, Brussels.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133