Recently some photon models of a Wigner’s friend experiment have led investigators to suggest that objective reality does not exist, and to publish articles with such claims. The public is not equipped to evaluate the severe limitations of these experiments. The separation of Wigner from the experiment and use of only reversible coherent processes for the friend allow operations that are not possible in ordinary reality according to the latest quantum research. We suggest directly testing the implied claim that objective reality, including incoherent objects with irreversible non-destructive memory, can be held in superposition. We suspect that it will fail, but provide for a graduated approach that may discover something about the conditions for superposition collapse. To this end, we design a thought experiment to model the objective world, investigating under what conditions experimenters in the same world (ensemble member) will be able to record a result and find it does not appear to change. This is not an investigation of hidden variables. To model the objective world, incoherent and irreversible processes must be included. To test for superposition, coherence has to be established. These seem to present a contradiction. The thought experiment suggests new places to look other than size for the origin of objective reality, casts doubt on the Many-Worlds interpretation, and provides a method of testing it.
References
[1]
Everett, H. (1957) Relative State Formulation of Quantum Mechanics. Reviews of Modern Physics, 29, 454-462. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.29.454
Becker, A. (2018) What Is Real? Hachette Book Group, New York.
[4]
Von Neumann, J. (1932) The Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. English Translation by Beyer, R.T. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
[5]
Schrödinger, E. (1935) The Present Situation in Quantum Mechanics. Naturwissenschaften, 23, 807-812. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01491891
[6]
Wigner, E.P. (1961) Remarks on the Mind-Body Question. In: Good, I.J., Ed., The Scientist Speculates, Heinemann, London.
[7]
Deutsch, D. (1985) Quantum Theory as a Universal Physical Theory. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 24, 1-41. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00670071
[8]
Arndt, M., Nairz, O., Vos-Andreae, J., Keller, C., vand der Zouw, G. and Zeilinger, A. (1999) Wave-Particle Duality of C60 Molecules. Nature, 401, 680-682. https://doi.org/10.1038/44348
[9]
Fein, Y.Y., Geyer, P., Zwick, P., Kialka, F., Pedalino, S., Mayor, M., Gerlich, S. and Arndt, M. (2019) Quantum Supperposition of Molecules beyond 25 kDa. Nature Physics, 15, 1242-1245. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-019-0663-9
[10]
Brukner, C. (2017) On the Quantum Measurement Problem. Quantum Physics, arXiv:1507.05255.
[11]
Frauchiger, D. and Renner, R. (2018) Quantum Theory Cannot Consistently Describe the Use of Itself. Nature Communications, 9, Article No. 3711. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-05739-8
[12]
Proietti, M., Pickston, A., Graffitti, F., Barrow, P., Kundys, D., Branciard, C., et al. (2019) Experimental Test of Local Observer Independence. Science Advances, 5, Article ID: eaaw9832. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaw9832
[13]
Bong, K., Utreras-Alarcon, A., Ghafari, F., Liang, Y., Tischler, N., Cavalcanti, E.G., Pryde, G. and Wiseman, H.M. (2020) A Strong No-Go Theorem on the Wigner’s Friend Paradox. Nature Physics, 16, 1199-1205. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-020-0990-x
[14]
Fedrizzi, A. and Proietti, M. (2019) Objective Reality Doesn’t Exist, Quantum Experiment Shows. LiveScience. https://www.livescience.com/objective-reality-not-exist-quantum-physicists.html
[15]
Zurek, W.H. (2018) Quantum Reversibility Is Relative, or Does a Quantum Measurement Reset Initial Conditions? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 376. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2017.0315
[16]
Sokolovski, D. (2020) Quantum Measurements with, and Yet without an Observer. Entropy, 22, 1185. https://doi.org/10.3390/e22101185
[17]
Snyder, D.M. (2000) Irreversibility and Measurement in Quantum Mechanics.
[18]
Letzter, R. (2019) 2000 Atoms Exist in Two Places at Once in Unprecedented Quantum Experiment. LiveScience. https://www.livescience.com/2000-atoms-in-two-places-at-once.html
[19]
Mohammady, M.H., Auffeves, A. and Anders, J. (2020) Energetic Footprints of Irreversibility in the Quantum Regime. Communications Physics, 3, Article No. 89. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42005-020-0356-9
[20]
Peterson, J.P.S., Batalhão, T.B., Herrera, M., Souza, A.M., Sarthour, R.S., Oliveira, I.S. and Serra, R.M. (2019) Experimental Characterization of a Spin Quantum Heat Engine. Physical Review Letters, 123, Article ID: 240601. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.240601
[21]
Ghirardi, G., Pearle, P. and Rimini, A. (1990) Markov Processes in Hilbert Space and Continuous Spontaneous Localization of Systems of Identical Particles. Physical Review A, 42, 78-89. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.42.78
[22]
Wechsler, S.D. (2020) In Praise and in Criticism of the Model of the Continuous Spontaneous Localization of the Wave-Function. Journal of Quantum Information Science, 10, 73-103. https://doi.org/10.4236/jqis.2020.104006
[23]
De Broglie, L. (1925) On the Theory of Quanta. Annales de Physique, 10. https://aflb.minesparis.psl.eu/LDB-oeuvres/De_Broglie_Kracklauer.pdf https://doi.org/10.1051/anphys/192510030022
[24]
Baylls, W.E. (2007) De Broglie waves as an effect of clock desynchronization. Canadian Journal of Physics, 85, 1317-1323. https://doi.org/10.1139/p07-121
[25]
Dogra, R. (2002) A New Proposal Combining Quantum Mechanics and the Special Theory of Relativity. Aperion, 9, 20-27.
[26]
Ylmaz, H. (2010) Lorentz Transformations and Wave-Particle Unity. Physics Essays, 23, 334-336. https://doi.org/10.4006/1.3409115
[27]
Shuler, R.L. (2015) Common Pedagogical Issues with De Broglie Waves: Moving Double Slits, Composite Mass, and Clock Synchronization. Physical Sciences Research International, 2015, Article ID: 895134. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/895134
[28]
Wignall, J.W.G. (1985) De Broglie Waves and the Nature of Mass. Foundations of Physics, 15, 207-227. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00735293
[29]
Serafini, A., De Siena, S., Illuminati, F. and Paris, M.G.A. (2003) Minimum Decoherence Cat-Like States in Gaussian Noisy Channels. Journal of Optics B, 6, S591. https://doi.org/10.1088/1464-4266/6/6/019
[30]
Healey, R. (2018) Quantum Theory and the Limits of Objectivity. Foundations of Physics, 48, 1568-1569. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-018-0216-6
