全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

坡耕地土壤养分含量的分布特征
Distribution Characteristics of Soil Nutrient Content on Sloping Farmland

DOI: 10.12677/HJAS.2021.118107, PP. 802-808

Keywords: 有机质,全氮,有效磷,速效钾,不同坡度
Organic Matter
, Total Nitrogen, Available Phosphorus, Available Potassium, Different Slopes

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

坡度是土壤养分流失的重要因素,针对坡耕地水土流失的现状,本文进行了不同种植模式的土壤肥力保持效应研究。试验设计的三种坡度梯度分别为2?、3?和5?,两种种植模式分别为小麦和油菜,养分指标选取的是有机质、全氮、有效磷和速效钾。结果表明,油菜种植模式下,有机质含量表现为坡下 > 坡上 > 坡中,以2?有机质含量最高。在3?坡耕地土壤中,不同种植模式下依然表现为油菜种植的全氮含量高于小麦,增幅介于27.30%~69.06%之间,以坡中部位的增幅最大。3?坡耕地中种植油菜较小麦有效磷含量增加了15.70%~31.51%,速效钾含量增加了10.40%~11.55%。可见种植油菜促进了坡耕地土壤养分的积累,可作为坡耕地土壤肥力保持的一种有效种植作物。
Slope is an important factor in soil nutrient loss. Aiming at the current situation of soil erosion on slope farmland, this paper conducted a research on soil fertility maintenance effects of different planting patterns. The three slope gradients of the experimental design were 2?, 3? and 5?, and the two planting modes were wheat and rape. The nutrient indicators were organic matter, total nitro-gen, available phosphorus and available potassium. The results showed that under the rape planting mode, the organic matter content was downhill > uphill > mid-slope, with the highest organic matter content at 2?. In the soil of 3? sloping farmland, the total nitrogen content of rapeseed planting is still higher than that of wheat under different planting modes, and the increase is between 27.30%~69.06%, with the largest increase in the middle part of the slope. Compared with wheat, the available phosphorus content of rapeseed planted in 3? slope farmland increased by 15.70%~31.51%, and the available potassium content increased by 10.40%~11.55%. It can be seen that rapeseed planting promotes the accumulation of soil nutrients in sloping farmland, and can be used as an effective planting crop for soil fertility maintenance in slope farming.

References

[1]  康轩, 黄景, 吕巨智, 等. 保护性耕作对土壤养分及有机碳库的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 2009, 18(6): 2339-2343.
[2]  张海林, 孙国峰, 陈继康, 等. 保护性耕作对农田碳效应影响研究进展[J]. 中国农业科学, 2009, 42(12): 4275-4281.
[3]  邵明安. 黄土高原土壤侵蚀与旱地农业[M]. 西安: 陕西科学技术出版社, 1999: 1-9.
[4]  周佩华, 张学栋, 唐克丽. 黄土高原土壤侵蚀与旱地农业国家重点实验室土壤侵蚀模拟试验大厅降雨装置[J]. 水土保持通报, 2000, 20(4): 27-30.
[5]  杜章留, 高伟达, 陈素英, 等. 保护性耕作对太行山前平原土壤质量的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2011, 19(5): 1134-1142.
[6]  马传功, 陈建军, 郭先华, 等. 坡耕地不同种植模式对农田水土保持效应及土壤养分流失的影响[J]. 农业资源与环境学报, 2016, 33(1): 72-79.
[7]  付斌. 不同农作处理对坡耕地水土流失和养分流失的影响研究——以云南红壤为例[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 重庆: 西南大学, 2009.
[8]  安瞳昕, 李彩虹, 吴伯志, 等. 玉米不同间作方式对坡耕地水土流失的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2007, 21(5): 18-24.
[9]  安瞳昕, 李彩虹, 吴伯志, 等. 坡耕地玉米不同间作模式效益研究[J]. 作物杂志, 2009(5): 92-94.
[10]  Peng, X.Y., Tong, X.G., Hao, L.T., et al. (2019) Applicability of Biochar for Limiting Interrill Erosion and Organic Carbon Export of Sloping Cropland in a Semi-Arid Area of China. Agriculture, Ecosystems & En-vironment, 280, 68-76.
[11]  Burwell, R.E., Timmons, D.R. and Holt, R.F. (1975) Nutrient Transport in Surface Runoff as Influenced by Soil Cover and Seasonal Periods. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 39, 523-528.
https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1975.03615995003900030040x
[12]  王全九, 沈晋, 王文焰, 等. 降雨条件下黄土坡面溶质随地表径流迁移实验研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 1993, 7(1): 11-17.
[13]  穆天亮. 黄土坡面土壤溶质随地表径流迁移特征与数学模型[D]: [博士学位论文]. 西安: 西安理工大学, 2009.
[14]  邓龙洲, 张丽萍, 范晓娟, 等. 不同雨强和坡度下侵蚀性风化花岗岩母质坡地产流产沙特征[J]. 农业工程学报, 2018, 34(17): 143-150.
[15]  Cao, C., Jiang, S., Ying, Z., et al. (2011) Spatial Variability of Soil nutrients and Microbiological Properties after the Estab-lishment of Leguminous Shrub Caragana microphylla Lam. Plantation on Sand Dune in the Horqin Sandy Land of Northeast China. Ecological Engineering, 37, 1467-1475.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2011.03.012
[16]  中国科学院南京土壤研究所. 土壤物理分析[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1978.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133