Despite years of governmental and academic institutions’ researches, no experimental standards are established for evaluating crush Specific Energy Absorption SEA for plain weave fabric woven carbon-fiber-reinforced composites used in modern aircraft structures as elements of the boxes to mitigate damage during crush events. At the laboratory scale, this paper proposes a comparative study of energy absorption capability of flat plate coupons made by CFRP plain weave fabric composites. A new fixture design and setup were created with hydraulic pressure and drop tower machines to carry out tests of flat plate composite specimens under quasi-static and low velocity on-axis crash loading. For investigating parameters sensibility of triggers and layups, numerical and experimental results of four trigger types and three stacking sequences were compared. A confrontation between experimental and pre-developed UL-Crush numerical material model results confirms that coupons with 0？ oriented central plies and saw teeth or corrugated triggers dissipates higher energy during crush, compared to coupons with 90？ or 45？ oriented central plies and chamfer 45？ or steeple triggers. An efficient and simplified experimental methodology was developed to measure and investigate different parameters influencing SEA of composites under crush load. Comparison between experimental and UL-Crush material model confirms the performance of such simulation tool.
References
[1]
Wade, B. (2014) Capturing the Energy Absorbing Mechanisms of Composite Structures under Crash Loading. University of Washington, Washington DC.
[2]
Guida, M., Marulo, F. and Abrate, S. (2018) Advances in Crash Dynamics for Aircraft Safety. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 98, 106-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paerosci.2018.03.008
[3]
Ala, T. and Sandeep, M. (2018) A Non-Linear Strain-Rate Micro-Mechanical Composite Material Model for Impact Problems. 15th International LS-DYNA Users Conference, Detroit, 10-12 June 2018, 1-22.
[4]
Fasanella, E.L. and Jackson, K.E. (2002) Best Practices for Crash Modeling and Simulation. NASA/TM-2002-211944, ARL-TR-2849. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Army Research Lab, Vehicle Technology Directorate, Hampton, VA.
[5]
Sause, M.G.R. (2016) In Situ Monitoring of Fiber-Reinforced Composites: Theory, Basic Concepts, Methods, and Applications. Vol. 242, Springer International Publishing, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30954-5
[6]
Garcea, S., Wang, Y. and Withers, P. (2018) X-Ray Computed Tomography of Polymer Composites. Composites Science and Technology, 156, 305-319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2017.10.023
[7]
Zhuang, F., Chen, P., Arteiro, A. and Camanho, P. (2019) Mesoscale Modeling of Damage in Half-Hole Pin Bearing Composite Laminate Specimens. Composite Structures, 214, 191-213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.01.062
[8]
McGregor, C.J. (2005) Simulation of Progressive Damage Development in Braided Composite Tubes under Axial Compression. Master’s Thesis, University of British Columbia, Vancouver.
[9]
Costa, S., Portugal, A., Olsson, R., Vyas, G. and Bru, T. (2017) Validation of a Novel Nodel for the Compressive Reponse of FRP: Numerical Simulation. 21st International Conference on Composite Materials, Xi’an, 20-25 August 2017, 20-25.
[10]
Hull, D. (1991) A Unified Approach to Progressive Crushing of Fibre-Reinforced Composite Tubes. Composites Science and Technology, 40, 377-421. https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-3538(91)90031-J
[11]
Czaplicki, M., Robertson, R. and Thornton, P. (1991) Comparison of Bevel and Tulip Triggered Pultruded Tubes for Energy Absorption. Composites Science and Technology, 40, 31-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-3538(91)90041-M
[12]
Jimenez, M., Miravete, A. and Larrode, E. (2000) Effect of Trigger Geometry on Energy Absorption in Composite Profiles. Composite Structures, 48, 107-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-8223(99)00081-1
[13]
Falzon, B. and Wand, T. (2016) Modelling the Crush Behaviour of the Thermoplastic Composites. Composites Science and Technology, 134, 57-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2016.07.015
[14]
Lombarkia, R., Gakwaya, A., Nandlall, D., Dano, M.-L., Lévesque, J. and Vachon-Joannette, P. (2020) Experimental Investigation and Finite-Element Modeling of the Crushing Response of Hat Shape Open Section Composites. International Journal of Crashworthiness, Published Online 29/10/2020. https://doi.org/10.1080/13588265.2020.1838773
[15]
CMH-17 (2017) Chapter 16. Crashworthiness and Energy Management. Composite Materials Handbook: Polymer Matrix Composites—Materials Usage, Design, and Analysis (CMH-17), Vol. 3, SAE International, Warrendale.
[16]
Nailadi, C. (2005) A Summary of the ACC Tube Testing Program. Proceedings of the 49th MIL-HDBK-17 Coordination Meeting, Santa Monica, CA, December 2005.
[17]
Lavoie, J. and Morton, J. (1993) Design and Application of a Quasi-Static Crush Test Fixture for Investigating Scale Effects in Energy Absorbing Composite Plates. NASA Contractor Report-4526, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia.
[18]
Johnson, A. and Kohlgruber, D. (2000) Design and Performance of Energy Absorbing Subfloor Structures in Aerospace Applications. iMechE Seminar S672: Materials and Structures for Energy Absorption, London, London, 9 May 2000.
[19]
Wiggenraad, J. (2003) Crashworthiness Research at NLR: 1990-2003. NLR TP-2003-217. National Aerospace Laboratory NLR, Amsterdam.
[20]
Guillon, D. (2009) Experimental and Numerical Study of the Splaying Mode Crush of CFRP Laminates. 17th International Conference on Composite Materials, 27-31 July 2009, Edinburgh.
[21]
Thomas, B., Paul, W., Renaud, G., Robin, O. and Gaurav, V. (2017) Development of a Test Method for Evaluating the Crushing Behaviour of Unidirectional Laminates. Journal of Composite Materials, 51, 4041-4051. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0021998317697811
[22]
Salvi, A.G., Waas, A.M. and Caliskan, A. (2004) Rate-Dependant Compressive Behavior of Unidirectional Carbon Fiber Composites. Polymer Composites, 25, 397-406. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.20033
[23]
Chen, W. and Song, B. (2010) Split Hopkinson (Kolsky) Bar: Design, Testing and Applications. Springer, Boston. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7982-7
[24]
Harizi, W., Monnin, A., Aboura, Z. and Benzeggagh, M. (2015) A New Hydraulic Crash Machine for Composite Structures. Journal of Dynamic Behavior of Materials, 1, 94-100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40870-015-0004-8
[25]
Meyers, M. (1994) Dynamic Behavior of Materials. Wiley, New York. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470172278
[26]
Benjamin, B. (2016) étude de la délamination sur des matériaux composites tissés taffetas: Essais de caractérisation et simulations numériques. Université Laval, Québec.
[27]
Lombarkia, R., Gakwaya, A., Nandlall, D., Dano, M.-L., Lévesque, J., Benkhelifa, A., Vachon-Joannette, P. and Gagnon, P. (2021) A Meso-Mechanical Material Model Describing a Crash Behavior of 2D Plain Weave Fabric Composites. CEAS Aeronautical Journal, 12, 147-171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13272-020-00488-1 https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs13272-020-00488-1
Joosten, M., Dutton, S., Kelly, D. and Thomson, R. (2011) Experimental and Numerical Investigation of the Crushing Response of an Open Section Composite Energy Absorbing Element. Composite Structures, 93, 682-689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2010.08.011
[30]
Chiu, L.N., Falzon, B.G., Boman, R., Chen, B. and Yan, W. (2015) Finite Element Modeling of Composite Structures under Crushing Load. Compoistes Structures, 131, 215-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.05.008
[31]
Esnaola, A., Elguezabal, B., Aurrekkoetxea, J., Gallego, I. and Ulacia, I. (2016) Optimization of the Semi-Hexagonal Geometry of a Composite Crush Structure by Finite Element Analysis. Composites Part B: Engineering, 93, 56-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.03.002
[32]
Waimer, M., Siemann, M. and Feser, T. (2017) Simulation of CFRP Components Subjected to Dynamic Crash Loads. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 101, 115-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2016.11.011
