全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Rubblization: A Practical, Cost Effective and Sustainable Option for Repairing Deteriorated Airfield Pavement in the Empty Quarter Desert of Saudi Arabia

DOI: 10.4236/ojce.2021.112014, PP. 216-234

Keywords: Rubblization, Reinforced Concrete Pavement, Test Pits, Reflective Cracking, Modulus, Rubblization Modulus, and Super Pave, Heavy Weight Deflectometer (HWD), FAARFIELD, Federal Aviation Authority (FAA)

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Rubblization technique has been extensively used to repair the damaged concrete pavement and has proven successful in developed countries like the US and Europe. It has not been fully adopted in developing region like the Middle East and this paper presents the design and construction challenges posed while assessing damaged concrete runway in empty quarter of Saudi Arabia. A number of design options for repairs for runway pavement were considered and rubblization was chosen as a preferred option for repair. This paper includes the consideration for the assessment and adoption of the concrete rubblized modulus value using the falling weight deflectometer, optimization of the tests for the whole runway using the Heavy Weight Deflectometer HWD testing to replace pits, safely working around the utilities, reasonable assumption of drop height of the pavement and installation of utility conduits in the rubblized layer. Findings of the paper demonstrates resolving technical issues which are not very well covered in the Federal Aviation Authority (FAA) EB-66 such as the additional test strips, minimum areas of rubblization for assessment using test pits, drop in the height of concrete surface and fixing of utilities in rubblized pavement. The case study demonstrates that the rubblization can be successfully carried out in remote locations like empty quarter of Saudi Arabia with carefully carried out detailed site investigations, adopting correct assumed design rubblization modulus, quality control using HWD, protection of utilities while rubblizing and use of polymer modified asphalt for successful project deployment.

References

[1]  Galal, K.A., Coree, B.J., Haddock, J.E., and White, T.D. (1999) Structural Adequacy of Rubblized Portland Cement Concrete Pavement. Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1684, 172-177.
https://doi.org/10.3141/1684-20
[2]  Decker, D. (2006) Design and Construction Guidelines on Rubblizing and Overlaying PCC Pavements with Hot-Mix Asphalt.
https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Rubblization.-Design-and-Construction-Guidelines-of-Becker/02b3864ca2a876fb487ed13b4672bd8ddad69677#paper-header
[3]  Decker, D. (2006) Rubblization of Portland Cement Concrete Pavements.
http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/circulars/ec087.pdf
[4]  Gulen, S., Noureldin, A.S. and Weaver, J. (2004) Life and Cost Comparison of Three Rehabilitation Techniques on I-65 Between SR-2 and SR-114. Indiana Department of Transportation, West Lafayette.
https://doi.org/10.5703/1288284313478
[5]  Dhakal, N., Elseifi, M.A. and Zhang, Z. (2016) Mitigation Strategies for Reflection Cracking in Rehabilitated Pavements—A Synthesis. International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology, 9, 228-239.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijprt.2016.05.001
[6]  Rajagopal, A. (2011) Evaluation of Rubblization Project in Ohio. Infrastructure Management and Engineering Inc., Cincinnati, OH.
[7]  Gaspard, K., Icenogle, P., Abadie, C. and Elseifi, M. (2013) Historical Performance of Rubblized Jointed Portland Cement Concrete Pavement Overlaid with Asphaltic Concrete in the State of Louisiana. International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology, 6, 165-174.
[8]  Witczak, M.W. and Rada, G.R. (1992) Nationwide Evaluation Study of Asphalt Concrete Overlays Placed on Fractured PCC Pavements. Journal of the Transportation Research Board, Transportation Research Record 1374, 19-26.
[9]  (2020) SKY Brary, UK, Foreign Object Debris (FOD).
https://www.skybrary.aero/index.php/Foreign_Object_Debris_(FOD)
[10]  Quintus, H. (2007) Guidance, Parameters, and Recommendations for Rubblized Pavements.
https://wisconsindot.gov/documents2/research/05-07rubblization-f.pdf
[11]  Federal Aviation Administration (2020) AC 150/5320-6G—Airport Pavement Design and Evaluation Document Information
https://www.faa.gov/airports/resources/advisory_circulars/index.cfm/go/document.current/documentNumber/150_5320-6
[12]  Federal Aviation Administration (2017) FAARFIELD 1.42.
https://www.airporttech.tc.faa.gov/Products/Airport-Safety-Papers-Publications/Airport-Safety-Detail/ArtMID/3682/ArticleID/4/FAARFIELD-142
[13]  Ceylan. H. (2005) Rubblization of Concrete Pavement Utilizing Rubblization and Crack and Seat Methods. Center for Transportation Research and Education Iowa State University, IOWA.
http://publications.iowa.gov/3548/1/rubblization.pdf
[14]  Antigo Construction (2020) 8600 Badger Breaker.
https://www.antigoconstruction.com/breaker-specifications/8600-badger-breaker
[15]  Antigo Construction (2020) MHB Badger Breaker®.
https://www.antigoconstruction.com/breaker-specifications/mhb-badger-breaker

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133