行政协议合法性与合约性司法审查规则——结合行申2289号行政裁定
Legality of Administrative Agreement and Rules of Judicial Review of Contract—Combined with Xingshen No. 2289 Administrative Ruling

对于行政协议的合法性与合约性的司法审查标准问题，理论与实务界都仍存在较大的争议。根据行政协议自身所负载的功能，在行政协议的司法审查标准上，应当坚持合法性与合约性相结合，合法性审查是合约性审查的前提和基础，合约性审查在某种程度上是合法性审查的一种延伸。在具体案件审理过程中应当要分清两者的主次地位，在司法审查涉及“行政性”的问题时，主要适用行政法的规范来进行审查；在体现“合同性”的问题上，法院审理案件时可以有条件地优先适用约定和民事法律规范。两者在司法审查过程中，不仅有主次地位之分，并且有时又是相互交织的复杂关系。
There are still great disputes on the standard of judicial review of the legality and contractual na-ture of administrative agreements in both theoretical and practical circles. According to the func-tion of the administrative agreement itself, in the judicial review standard of the administrative agreement, we should adhere to the combination of legality and contract. The legality review is the premise and basis of the contract review, and the contract review is an extension of the legality re-view to some extent. In the process of trial of specific cases, we should distinguish the primary and secondary status of the two. When judicial review involves “administrative” issues, we should mainly apply the norms of administrative law to review; On the issue of “contractual nature”, the court can conditionally give priority to the application of agreement and civil legal norms when try-ing cases. In the process of judicial review, they not only have the primary and secondary status, but also sometimes are intertwined with each other.