全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
Finance  2021 

京津冀协同发展对沿线区域普惠金融数字化的影响效应研究
Studies on the Effect of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Collaborative Development on the Digitization of Inclusive Finance in the Region along the Route

DOI: 10.12677/FIN.2021.113021, PP. 176-187

Keywords: 京津冀协同发展,普惠金融数字化,双重差分法,政策效应评估
Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Co-Development
, Inclusive Financial Digitization, Double Differential Method, Policy Effect Evaluation

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

京津冀协同发展政策的提出作为促进地区市场一体化的重要事件,其对沿线地区引进普惠金融数字化产生了重大影响。本文基于2011年~2017年全国省域面板数据,利用双重差分法(DID)模型实证检验了京津冀协同发展政策对沿线省域普惠金融数字化的政策效应。研究结果表明:京津冀协同发展政策倡议显著促进了沿线省域的普惠金融数字化发展,稳健性检验的结果表明结论稳健。因此京津冀协同发展政策沿线地区政府应积极出台相关支持性政策,并加强普惠金融数字化合作,国家也应加大相应的普惠金融数字化支持,同时注意加强金融监管,以良性推动普惠金融数字化发展水平的提高,最终促进地区经济乃至中国整体经济的发展。
As an important event to promote regional market integration, the proposed Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei coordinated development policy has had a great impact on the introduction of inclusive financial digitization in the regions along the route. Based on the national provincial panel data from 2011 to 2017, using the Difference in Difference (DID) model, this paper empirically tests the Bei-jing-Tianjin-Hebei collaborative development policy effect on the digitalization of inclusive finance in the provinces along the route. The results show that the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Coordinated De-velopment Policy Initiative has significantly promoted the digital development of inclusive finance in the provinces along the route, and the results of the robustness test show that the conclusions are sound. Therefore, the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei coordinated development policy along the regional government should actively introduce relevant support policies, and strengthen inclusive financial digital cooperation, the state should also try to increase the related inclusive financial digital sup-port, while paying attention to strengthen financial supervision, with the intention of promoting the development of inclusive financial digitalization, and ultimately promoting the regional economy and china’s overall economic development.

References

[1]  鲁丹. 互联网金融视角下新疆普惠金融发展研究[J]. 合作经济与科技, 2017(19): 60-61.
[2]  张优. 京津冀地区节能减排政策协同效应研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 北京: 华北电力大学, 2018.
[3]  吴金旺, 郭福春, 顾洲一. 数字普惠金融发展影响因素的实证分析——基于空间面板模型的检验[J]. 浙江学刊, 2018(3): 136-146.
[4]  杜佳倩. 中国数字普惠金融发展评价及影响因素分析[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 武汉: 中南财经政法大学, 2019.
[5]  史晓. 石家庄市县域普惠金融发展水平评价及影响因素分析[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 河北: 河北地质大学, 2019.
[6]  Tova, M.S. (2008) Financial Exclusion in Latin America or the Social Costs of not Banking the Urban Poor. Environment & Urbanization, 2, 47-66.
[7]  粟芳, 方蕾. “有为政府”与农村普惠金融发展——基于上海财经大学2015“千村调查”[J]. 财经研究, 2016, 42(12): 72-83.
[8]  谭文培. 基于“三位一体”视角的农村普惠金融体系构建[J]. 湖南科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2013, 16(6): 85-88.
[9]  Lindsey, A. (2010) Community Development Finance Institutions (CDFIs): Geographies of Financial Inclusion in the US and UK. Geoforum, 42, 250-258.
[10]  Franklin, A., Asli, D.-K., Leora, K. and Maria, S.M.P. (2016) The Foundations of Financial Inclusion: Understanding Ownership and Use of Formal Accounts. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 27, 1-30.
[11]  赵德治. 数字化普惠金融发展的影响因素研究[D]: [硕士学位论文].云南: 云南财经大学, 2020.
[12]  宋晓玲, 侯金辰. 互联网使用状况能否提升普惠金融发展水平?——来自25个发达国家和40个发展中国家的经验证据[J]. 管理世界, 2017(1): 172-173.
[13]  刘瑞明, 赵仁杰. 西部大开发: 增长驱动还是政策陷阱——基于PSM-DID方法的研究[J]. 中国工业经济, 2015(6): 32-43.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133