The Lower Mekong River basin (LMB) covers the lower part of the Mekong river basin, including Laos, Thailand, Cambodia and Vietnam. Due to numerous pressures from high population growth and intensive hydropower development, the LMB has been facing significant challenges concerning its biodiversity and ecosystem. In 2017, Mekong River Commission (MRC), an intergovernmental organisation founded in 1995 among LMB countries, established the Council Study, which analysed the impacts of water development scenarios concerning the environmental, socioeconomic aspects of the LMB. This paper explores the nature of risks to the LMB water development and subsequently evaluates LMB’s water development scenarios described in the Council Study by using a multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) method. MCDA method has been widely applied in the field of water resource management in order to assist the decision-making process by systematically evaluating a certain number of alternatives against well-selected criteria through a preference rating scheme. By implementing a risk-based comprehensive assessment of the LMB transboundary water, this study provides insights into the impacts of the increasing risks to the ecosystem and human beings on the water development of the basin over time, which assists to change the awareness and the perspective toward humans’ risks and transboundary river ecosystem of decision-makers. This paper provides valuable recommendations for MRC to improve their policy concerning benefit-sharing scheme, water planning and risk mitigation strategies.
References
[1]
Wolf, A.T., Kramer, A., Carius, A. and Dabelko, G.D. (2005) Managing Water Conflict and Cooperation. State World 2005 Redefining Glob. Secur., 80-95.
[2]
UN-Water (2015) Good Practices in Transboundary Water Cooperation. https://www.unwater.org/water-facts/transboundary-waters/
[3]
Glennie, P., Bertule, M., Eynard, J., Jaiteh, M., Schneider, C. and Bjørnsen, P. (2016) Chapter 1: Introduction. In UNEP-DHI and UNEP (2016). In: Transboundary River Basins: Status and Trends, United Nations Environment Programme, Nairobi, 1-7.
[4]
WWAP (2012) The United Nations World Water Development Report 4: Managing Water under Uncertainty and Risk. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000215644
[5]
Zeitoun, M., Goulden, M. and Tickner, D. (2013) Current and Future Challenges Facing Transboundary River Basin Management. WIREs Climate Change, 4, 331-349. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.228
[6]
UN-Water (2009) Water in a Changing World. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000181993
[7]
UN-Water (2006) Water: A Shared Responsibility; the United Nations World Water Development Report 2, Executive Summary. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000144409
[8]
Sanchez, J.C. and Roberts, J. (2014) Transboundary Water Governance: Adaptation to Climate Change. IUCN, Gland.
[9]
MRC (2019) State of the Basin Report 2018. Mekong River Comm., 1-226.
[10]
Chea, R., Grenouillet, G. and Lek, S. (2016) Evidence of Water Quality Degradation in Lower Mekong Basin Revealed by Self-Organizing Map. PLoS One, 11, e0145527. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145527
[11]
MRC (2017) Mekong Climate Change Adaptation Strategy and Action Plan. Mekong River Commission, Vientiane.
[12]
MRC (2011) Planing Altas of the Lower Mekong River Basin. Mekong River Commission, Vientiane.
[13]
MRC (2010) State of the Basin Report 2010. Mekong River Commission, Vientiane.
[14]
MRC (2003) State of the Basin Report 2003 Executive Summary. Mekong River Commission, Vientiane.
[15]
MRC (2011) Basin Development Plan Programme 2: Assessment of Basin-wide Development Scenarios. Mekong River Commission, Vientiane.
[16]
MRC (2017) The Council Study: The Study on Sustainable Management and Development of the Mekong River Basin, including Impacts of Mainstream Hydropower Projects. Thematic Report on the Positive and Negative Impacts of Hydropower Development on the Social, Environment. MRC, Mekong River Commission, p. 107.
[17]
ICEM (2010) MRC Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) of Hydropower on the Mekong Mainstream. ICEM, Hanoi.
[18]
Sandoval-Solis, S., Teasley, R.L., McKinney, D.C., Thomas, G.A. and Patiño-Gomez, C. (2013) Collaborative Modeling to Evaluate Water Management Scenarios in the Rio Grande Basin. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 49, 639-653. https://doi.org/10.1111/jawr.12070
[19]
Petersen-Perlman, J., De Stefano, L., Petersen-Perlman, J.D., Sproles, E.A., Eynard, J. and Wolf, A.T. (2017) Assessment of Transboundary River Basins for Potential Hydro-Political Tensions. Global Environmental Change, 45, 35-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.04.008
[20]
Ma, J., Hipel, K.W., De, M. and Cai, J. (2008) Transboundary Water Policies: Assessment, Comparison and Enhancement. Water Resources Management, 22, 1069-1087. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-007-9211-y
[21]
Sarband, E.M., Araghinejad, S. and Attari, J. (2020) Developing an Interactive Spatial Multi-Attribute Decision Support System for Assessing Water Resources Allocation Scenarios. Water Resources Management, 34, 447-462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-019-02291-y
[22]
Safavi, H.R., Golmohammadi, M.H. and Sandoval-Solis, S. (2016) Scenario Analysis for Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management under Uncertainty in the Zayandehrud River Basin. Journal of Hydrology, 539, 625-639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.05.073
[23]
Li, X. (2012) Hydropower in the Mekong River Basin: A Balancing Test. Environmental Claims Journal, 24, 51-69. https://doi.org/10.1080/10406026.2012.663299
[24]
Piman, T., Cochrane, T.A., Arias, M.E., Dat, N.D. and Vonnarart, O. (2015) Managing Hydropower under Climate Change in the Mekong Tributaries. In: Shrestha, S., Anal, A., Salam, P. and van der Valk, M., Eds., Managing Water Resources under Climate Uncertainty, Springer, Cham, 223-248. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10467-6_11
[25]
Kuenzer, C., Campbell, I., Roch, M., Leinenkugel, P., Tuan, V.Q. and Dech, S. (2013) Understanding the Impact of Hydropower Developments in the Context of Upstream-Downstream Relations in the Mekong River Basin. Sustainability Science, 8, 565-584. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-012-0195-z
[26]
Kummu, M., Koponen, J. and Sarkkula, J. (2005) Assessing Impacts of the Mekong Development in the Tonle Sap Lake. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Role of Water Sciences in Transboundary River Basin Management, Regional Network Office for Urban Safety, School of Civil Engineering, Asian Institute of Technology, Thailand, 10-12.
[27]
Intralawan, A., Wood, D., Frankel, R., Costanza, R. and Kubiszewski, I. (2018) Tradeoff Analysis between Electricity Generation and Ecosystem Services in the Lower Mekong Basin. Ecosystem Services, 30, 27-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.007
[28]
Piman, T., Lennaerts, T. and Southalack, P. (2013) Assessment of Hydrological Changes in the Lower Mekong Basin from Basin-Wide Development Scenarios. Hydrological Processes, 27, 2115-2125. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.9764
[29]
Grigg, N.S. (2015) Problem Archetypes as Common Ground for Water Resources Management Education. Water Resources Management, 29, 3535-3550. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-015-1013-z
[30]
Yilmaz, B. and Harmancioglu, N.B. (2010) Multi-Criteria Decision Making for Water Resource Management: A Case Study of the Gediz River Basin, Turkey. Water SA, 36, 563-576. https://doi.org/10.4314/wsa.v36i5.61990
[31]
Tzeng, G.-H. and Huang, J.-J. (2011) Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications. CRC Press, New York. https://doi.org/10.1201/b11032
[32]
Velasquez, M. and Hester, P.T. (2013) An Analysis of Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods. International Journal of Operational Research, 10, 56-66.
[33]
Zolghadr-Asli, B., Bozorg-Haddad, O., Enayati, M. and Chu, X. (2021) A Review of 20-Year Applications of Multi-Attribute Decision-Making in Environmental and Water Resources Planning and Management. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01278-3
[34]
Çelen, A. (2014) Comparative Analysis of Normalization Procedures in TOPSIS Method: With an Application to Turkish Deposit Banking Market. Informatica, 25, 185-208. https://doi.org/10.15388/Informatica.2014.10
[35]
Fallah-Mehdipour, E., Bozorg-Haddad, O. and Loáiciga, H.A. (2018) Calculation of Multi-Objective Optimal Tradeoffs between Environmental Flows and Hydropower Generation. Environmental Earth Sciences, 77, Article No. 453. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-018-7645-6
[36]
Mani, M., Bozorg-Haddad, O. and Loáiciga, H.A. (2019) A New Framework for the Optimal Management of Urban Runoff with Low-Impact Development Stormwater Control Measures Considering Service-Performance Reduction. Journal of Hydroinformatics, 21, 727-744. https://doi.org/10.2166/hydro.2019.126
[37]
He, L., Shao, F. and Ren, L. (2020) Identifying Optimal Groundwater Remediation Strategies through a Simulation-Based PROMETHEE-TOPSIS Approach: An Application to a Naphthalene-Contaminated Site. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, 26, 1550-1568. https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2019.1591267
[38]
Pietersen, K. (2006) Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA): A Tool to Support Sustainable Management of Groundwater Resources in South Africa. Water SA, 32, 119-128. https://doi.org/10.4314/wsa.v32i2.5242
[39]
Barzegar, R., Moghaddam, A.A., Adamowski, J. and Nazemi, A.H. (2019) Delimitation of Groundwater Zones under Contamination Risk Using a Bagged Ensemble of Optimized DRASTIC Frameworks. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26, 8325-8339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04252-9
[40]
Srdjevic, B., Medeiros, Y.D.P. and Faria, A.S. (2004) An Objective Multi-Criteria Evaluation of Water Management Scenarios. Water Resources Management, 18, 35-54. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:WARM.0000015348.88832.52
[41]
Goodwin, D., Raffin, M., Jeffrey, P. and Smith, H.M. (2019) Stakeholder Evaluations of Risk Interventions for Non-Potable Recycled Water Schemes: A Case Study. Science of the Total Environment, 674, 439-450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.044
[42]
Qin, X.-S., Huang, G.H., Chakma, A., Nie, X.H. and Lin, Q.G. (2008) A MCDM-Based Expert System for Climate-Change Impact Assessment and Adaptation Planning—A Case Study for the Georgia Basin, Canada. Expert Systems with Applications, 34, 2164-2179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2007.02.024
[43]
Vila, M., Afsordegan, A., Agell, N., Sánchez, M. and Costa, G. (2018) Influential Factors in Water Planning for Sustainable Tourism Destinations. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 26, 1241-1256. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2018.1433183
[44]
Marques, J., Cunha, M. and Savić, D. (2017) Ranking Alternatives for the Flexible Phased Design of Water Distribution Networks. Procedia Engineering, 186, 567-575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.03.271
[45]
Cunha, M., Marques, J., Creaco, E. and Savić, D. (2019) A Dynamic Adaptive Approach for Water Distribution Network Design. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 145, 4019026. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001085
[46]
Irvem, A. and Topaloǧlu, F. (2012) Identification of Flood Risk Area in the Orontes River Basin, Turkey, Using Multi-Criteria Decision Analyses. Journal of Food, Agriculture and Environment, 10, 895-899.
[47]
Lee, M., Yu, C.-Y., Chiang, P.-C. and Hou, C.-H. (2018) Water-Energy Nexus for Multi-Criteria Decision Making in Water Resource Management: A Case Study of Choshui River Basin in Taiwan. Water (Switzerland), 10, 1740. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10121740
[48]
Taha, R., Dietrich, J., Dehnhardt, A. and Hirschfeld, J. (2019) Scaling Effects in Spatial Multi-Criteria Decision Aggregation in Integrated River Basin Management. Water, 11, 355. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11020355
[49]
Qin, J., Fu, X., Peng, S., Xu, Y., Huang, J. and Huang, S. (2019) Asymmetric Bargaining Model for Water Resource Allocation over Transboundary Rivers. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16, 1733. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16101733
[50]
UNEP-DHI and UNEP (2016) Transboundary River Basins: Status and Trends. United Nations Environ. Program. (UNEP), Nairobi, Vol. 3.
[51]
Macharis, C., Verbeke, A. and De Brucker, K. (2004) The Strategic Evaluation of New Technologies through Multicriteria Analysis: The Advisors Case. Research in Transportation Economics, 8, 443-462. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0739-8859(04)08019-9
[52]
Toloie-Eshlaghy, A. and Homayonfar, M. (2011) MCDM Methodologies and Applications: A Literature Review from 1999 to 2009. Research Journal of International Studies, 21, 86-137.
[53]
Wątróbski, J., Jankowski, J., Ziemba, P., Karczmarczyk, A. and Zioło, M. (2019) Generalised Framework for Multi-Criteria Method Selection. Omega, 86, 107-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2018.07.004
[54]
Liljeström, I., Kummu, M. and Varis, O. (2012) Nutrient Balance Assessment in the Mekong Basin: Nitrogen and Phosphorus Dynamics in a Catchment Scale. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 28, 373-391. https://doi.org/10.1080/07900627.2012.668649
[55]
MRC (2020) Annual Report 2019. Mekong River Commission, Vientiane, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. i-v.
[56]
Maavara, T., Parsons, C.T., Ridenour, C., et al. (2015) Global Phosphorus Retention by River Damming. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States Of America, 112, 15603-15608. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1511797112
[57]
MRC (2016) Basin Development Strategy 2016-2020. Mekong River Commision.,.
[58]
MRC (2018) MRC Council Study: The Study on the Sustainable Management and Development of the Mekong River Basin, Including Impacts of Mainstream Hydropower Projects Coastal Modelling Report. No. January, p. 37.
