The
objective is to empower the reader and scientific community with the knowledge
and specific applicable equations to then reproduce the critical rock and fluid
attributes in the Powder River Basin. To then continue to unravel the basin and
its potential (both conventionally and unconventionally). The overall goal is
to ensure the transfer of knowledge and communication
of a petrophysical workflow that can then also influence application to other
basins worldwide. The Powder River Basin is
in southeast Montana and northeast Wyoming and is a prolific oil and gas
(hydrocarbon-prone) sedimentary basin related to the greater Rockies chain/series of hydrocarbon-bearing
basins (ex. Big Horn, Greater Green River, Denver-Jules). In this study, we briefly set-up the geological
background of the Powder River Basin and the importance/ relevance to then
tackling subsurface petrophysical evaluation on a regional scale. Approximately,
200 wells were evaluated petrophysically by a combined deterministic and
inversion-based workflow representing an effort to share best practices, approaches, and the relative trends to apply in the
basin to unravel the stratigraphic hydrocarbon potential in place. An extensive
workflow involving basic petrophysical approaches such as raw log applicable
cutoffs and volume of clay determination are shared as well as extending knowledge and application into advanced
petrophysics through geochemical property derivation and impact of those
derived properties as well as bound versus free water and hydrocarbon understanding. Results of the petrophysical
analysis highlight the varying properties in conventional and unconventional
formations (example Niobrara). The results of how and why the petrophysical
approach was calibrated and then applied are the primary efforts accomplished.
References
[1]
Glaze, F., Robert, E. and Keller, E.R. (1965) Geologic History of the Powder River Basin. AAPG Bulletin, 49, 1893-1907. https://doi.org/10.1306/A6633874-16C0-11D7-8645000102C1865D
[2]
Anna, L.O. (2010) Geologic Assessment of Undiscovered Oil and Gas in the Powder River Basin Province Wyoming and Montana. In: Total Petroleum Systems and Geologic Assessment of Oil and Gas Resources in the Powder River Basin Province, Wyoming and Montana, U.S. Geological Survey Series DDS-69-U, USGS, Reston, Chap. 1, 97 p. https://doi.org/10.3133/ds69U
[3]
Craddock, W.H., Drake, R.M., Mars, J.C. and Merrill, M.D. (2012) Geologic Framework for the National Assessment of Carbon Dioxide Storage Resources-Powder River Basin Wyoming, Montana, South Dakota, and Nebraska Chapter B. In: Geologic Framework for the National Assessment of Carbon Dioxide Storage Resources, USGS, Reston, Open File Report 2012-1024-B. https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20121024B
[4]
Bottjer, R., Hendricks, M.L., Stright, D.H. and Bettridge, J.A. (2014) Sussex Sandstone, Hornbuckle Trend, Powder River Basin, Wyoming: Lithofacies and Reservoir Properties in a Tight Oil Play. AAPG Rocky Mountain Section Meeting, Denver, 20-22 July 2014, Search and Discovery Article #10665.
[5]
Heger, A. (2016) Stratigraphy and Reservoir Characterization of the Turner Sandstone, Southern Powder River Basin, Wyoming. Colorado School of Mines MS Submission and Archive.
[6]
Sonnenberg, S. (2011) The Niobrara Petroleum System, a Major Tight Resource Play in the Rocky Mountain Region. AAPG Rocky Mountain Section Meeting, Cheyenne, 15-18 September 2019, Search and Discovery Article #10355.
[7]
Slack, P.B. (1981) Paleotectonics and Hydrocarbon Accumulation, Powder River Basin. AAPG Bulletin, 65, 730-743. https://doi.org/10.1306/2F9199BD-16CE-11D7-8645000102C1865D
[8]
Wyoming Oil and Gas Conservation Commission. WYOGC Scanned Log Database [LAS Files]. http://pipeline.wyo.gov/legacywogcce.cfm
[9]
Passey, Q.R., Creaney, S. and Kulla, J.B. (1990) A Practical Model for Organic Richness from Porosity and Resistivity Logs. AAPG Bulletin, 74, 1777-1794. https://doi.org/10.1306/0C9B25C9-1710-11D7-8645000102C1865D
[10]
Schmoker, J. (1979) Determination of Organic Content of Appalachian Devonian Shales from Formation-Density Logs: Geologic Notes. AAPG Bulletin, 63, 1504-1509. https://doi.org/10.1306/2F9185D1-16CE-11D7-8645000102C1865D
[11]
Passey, Q.R., Bohacs, W.L. and Klimentidis, W.L. (2010) From Oil-Prone Source Rock to Gas Producing Shale Reservoir—Geologic and Petrophysical Characterization of Unconventional Shale Gas Reservoirs. International Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition, Beijing, 8-10 June 2010, 29. https://doi.org/10.2118/131350-MS
[12]
Jarvie, D.M. (2017) Perspectives on Shale Resource Plays, the Role of Organic Petrology in the Exploration of Conventional and Unconventional Hydrocarbon Systems. In: Suarez-Ruiz, I. and Filho, J.G.M., Eds., Geology: Current and Future Developments, Bentham Science Publishers, Sharjah, Vol. 1, 316-343.
[13]
United States Geological Survey, Core Research Center: U.S. Geological Survey. CRC Well Catalog [Database]. https://my.usgs.gov/crcwc
[14]
Archie, G.E. (1952) Classification of Carbonate Reservoir Rocks and Petrophysical Considerations. AAPG Bulletin, 36, 218-298. https://doi.org/10.1306/3D9343F7-16B1-11D7-8645000102C1865D
[15]
Belyadi, H., Fathi, E. and Belyadi, F. (2019) Rock Mechanical Properties and in Situ Stresses. In: Belyadi, H., Fathi, E. and Belyadi, F., Eds., Hydraulic Fracturing in Unconventional Reservoirs, Second Edition, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 215-231. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-817665-8.00013-8
Couzens-Schultz, B.A., Axon, A., Azbel, K., Hansen, K.S., Haugland, M., Sarker, R., Tichelaar, B., Wieseneck, B., Wilhelm, R., Zhang, J. and Zhang, Z. (2013) Pore Pressure Prediction in Unconventionals. International Petroleum Technology Conference, Beijing.
[19]
Gong, C. and Rodriguez, L. (2017) Challenges in Pore Pressure Prediction for Unconventional Petroleum Systems. Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, Austin, 24-26 July 2017, Search and Discovery Article #402018.
[20]
Downey, M.W., Garvin, J., Lagomarsino, R.C. and Nicklin, D.F. (2010) Quick Look Determination of Oil-in-Place in Oil Shale Resource Plays. AAPG Annual Convention, Houston, Search and Discovery Article #40764.
[21]
Luffel, D.L., Hopkins, C.W. and Shettler, P.D. (1993) Matrix Permeability Measurements of Gas Productive Shales. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Houston, 3-6 October 1993, SPE 26633. https://doi.org/10.2118/26633-MS
[22]
Swanson, B.F. (1981) A Simple Correlation between Permeabilities and Mercury Injection Capillary Pressures. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 33, 2498-2504. https://doi.org/10.2118/8234-PA