全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Prediction of Nipple and Areola Complex Invasion in Breast Cancer Patients. Clinical and Pathological Study of Surgical Specimens

DOI: 10.4236/ojpathology.2021.113006, PP. 59-78

Keywords: Nipple and Areola Invasion, Breast Cancer, Clinical and Pathological

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Breast conservation surgery (BCS) and nipple-areola-sparing (NAS) mastectomy have been recognized as two milestones in this period. This study included 60 Egyptian female patients with breast cancer, all of them were subjected to modified radical mastectomy operation. Methods: This study included female patients > 18 years old who have breast cancer with healthy looking non invaded skin of nipple and areola and excluded patients < 18 years old, patients unfit for surger, patients previously subjected to chemo or radiotherapy for breast cancer. We peformed clinical examination of 60 patients with breast cancer. We studied the relevant factors that affect NAC invasion such as patient’s age, menstrual state, family history, tumor size, tumor location (central vs peripheral), tumor to nipple distance, lymphovascular invasion of NAC, lymph node metastasis, histological tumor type, tumor stage, multifocal/multicentric tumors and (ER, PR, HER2) status. Result: In our study, we have shown that NAC invasion is strongly associated with: 1) Nipple retraction as a patient’s complaint; 2) Tumor site; 3) Tumor-nipple-distance ≤ 4 cm; 4) Multifocal/multicentric tumor; 5) Tumor grade (grade III tumors); 6) Positive lymph node invasion; 7) ER and PR receptors negativity; 8) HER2 positivity. This helps in preoperative planning for selecting patients for NAS mastectomy. Conclusion: The ideal patients for NAS mastectomy are with these criteria: 1) Clinically normal nipple areola complex; 2) Distance from the tumor to the nipple is >4 cm; 3) No multifocal/multicentric tumor; 4) Absence of lymph node invasion; 5) Tumor grade (grade I, II); 6) Peripheral not central tumor; 7) No sub-areolar lymphovascular invasion (LVI); 8) ER receptor positive; 9) PR receptor positive; 10) HER2 negative.

References

[1]  Adrada, B., Arribas, E., Gilcrease, M. and Yang, W.T. (2019) Invasive Micropapillary Carcinoma of the Breast: Mammographic, Sonographic and MRI Features. American Journal of Roentgenology, 193, W58-W63.
[2]  Agrawal, A., Sibbering, D.M. and Courtney, C.A. (2013) Skin Sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Breast Reconstruction: A Review. European Journal of Surgical Oncology, 39, 320-328.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2012.12.015
[3]  Agur, A.M.R. and Dalley, A.F. (2018) The Breast. In: Agur, A.M.R. and Dalley, A.F., Eds., Grant’s Atlas of Anatomy, Vol. 1, 12th Edition, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, 5-9.
[4]  Alperovich, M., Tanna, N., Samra, F., Blechman, K., Shapiro, R.L., Guth, A.A., et al. (2013) Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy in Patients with a History of Reduction Mammaplasty or Mastopexy: How Safe Is It? Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 131, 962-967.
https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182865ad2
[5]  Araco, A., Gravante, G., Araco, F., Gentile, P., Castrì, F., Delogu, D., et al. (2016) Breast Asymmetries: A Brief Review and Our Experience. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 30, 309-319.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-005-0178-x
[6]  Rose, M., Manjer, J., Ringberg, A. and Svensson, H. (2014) Surgical Strategy, Methods of Reconstruction, Surgical Margins and Postoperative Complications in Oncoplastic Breast Surgery. European Journal of Plastic Surgery, 37, 205-214.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-013-0922-4
[7]  Skotnicki, P., Ryś, J., Blecharz, P., Reinfuss, M., Jakubowicz, J., Ambicka, A., et al. (2012) Invasive Lobular Carcinoma of the Breast: Cytometric and Immunohistochemical Characteristics of 96 Cases. Polish Journal of Pathology, 63, 112-120.
[8]  Harness, J.K., Vetter, T.S. and Salibian, A.H. (2011) Areola and Nipple-Areola-Sparing Mastectomy for Breast Cancer Treatment and Risk Reduction: Report of an Initial Experience in a Community Hospital Setting. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 18, 917-922.
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-010-1365-9
[9]  Gomez, C., Shah, C., Mc Closkey, S., Foster, N. and Vicini, F. (2014) The Role of Radiation Therapy after Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 21, 2237-2244.
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-013-3446-z
[10]  Zhang, H., Moran, M., Haffty, B., Haffty, B.G. and Yang, Q. (2015) Predictive Factors of Nipple Involvement in Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 151, 239-249.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-015-3385-4
[11]  Abou Nagah, G. and El-Sabaa, B. (2012) Nipple-Areola and Skin Sparing Mastectomy: Is it Oncologically Safe Procedure in Egyptian Females. Egyptian Journal of Surgery, 31, 12-15.
[12]  Sinn, H.P. and Kreipe, H. (2013) A Brief Overview of the WHO Classification of Breast Tumors, 4th Edition, Focusing on Issues and Updates from the 3rd Edition. Breast Care, 8, 149-154.
https://doi.org/10.1159/000350774
[13]  Weidong, L., Wang, S., Guo, X., Lang, R., Fan, Y., Gu, F., et al. (2017) Nipple Involvement in Breast Cancer Retrospective Analysis of 2323 Consecutive Mastectomy Specimens. International Journal of Surgical Pathology, 19, 328-334.
https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1066896911399279
[14]  Brachtel, E.F., Rusby, J.E., Michaelson, J.S., Leon Chen, L., Muzikansky, A., Smith, B.L., et al. (2009) Occult Nipple Involvement in Breast Cancer: Clinicopathologic Findings in 316 Consecutive Mastectomy Specimens. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 27, 4948-4954.
https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2008.20.8785
[15]  Wang, J., Xiao, X., Iqbal, N., Iqbal, N., Baxter, L., Skinner, K.A., et al. (2012) Predictors of Nipple-Areolar Complex Involvement by Breast Carcinoma: Histopathologic Analysis of 787 Consecutive Therapeutic Mastectomy Specimens. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 19, 1174-1180.
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-011-2107-3
[16]  Skandalakis, J., Colborn, G.L., Skandalakis, P.N., et al. (2016) Breast. In: Skandalakis, J., Colborn, G.L., Skandalakis, L.J. and Weidman, T.A., Eds., Skandalakis’ Surgical Anatomy: The Embryologic and Anatomic Basis of Modern Surgery, PMP, Athens, 106-107.
[17]  Simmons, R.M., Brennan, M., Christos, P., King, V. and Osborne, M. (2019) Analysis of Nipple/Areolar Involvement with Mastectomy: Can the Areola Be Preserved? Annals of Surgical Oncology, 9, 165-168.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02557369
[18]  Lawrence, R.A. and Lawrence, R.M. (2018) Breastfeeding: A Guide for the Medical Profession, 6th Edition, Elsevier, Philadelphia, 39-64.
[19]  Vlajcic, Z., Zic, R., Stanec, S., Lambasa, S., Petrovecki, M. and Stanec, Z. (2016) Nipple-Areola Complex Preservation: Predictive Factors of Neoplastic Nipple-Areola Complex Invasion. Annals of Plastic Surgery, 55, 240-244.
https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sap.0000171680.49971.85
[20]  Eisenberg, R.E., Chan, J.S., Swistel, A.J. and Hoda, S.A. (2014) Pathological Evaluation of Nipple Sparing Mastectomies with Emphasis on Occult Nipple Involvement: The Weill-Cornell Experience with 325 Cases. The Breast Journal, 20, 15-21.
https://doi.org/10.1111/tbj.12199
[21]  Endara, M., Chen, D., Verma, K., Nahabedian, M.Y. and Spear, S.L. (2013) Breast Reconstruction Following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: A Systematic Review of the Literature with Pooled Analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg, 132, 1043-1054.
https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182a48b8a
[22]  Gulben, K., Yildirim, E. and Berberoglu, U. (2009) Prediction of Occult Nipple-Areola Complex Involvement in Breast Cancer Patients. Neoplasma, 56, 72-75.
https://doi.org/10.4149/neo_2009_01_72

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133