全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

30种开花藤本植物在上海地区的适生性综合评价
Comprehensive Evaluation of Adaptability of 30 Flowering Vines in Shanghai

DOI: 10.12677/BR.2021.102024, PP. 162-169

Keywords: 开花藤本植物,层次分析法,适应性综合评价,评价因子
Flowering Vines
, Analytic Hierarchy Process, Comprehensive Evaluation of Adaptability, Evaluation Factor

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

为推广开花藤本植物在上海地区的园林应用,基于层次分析法(AHP)建立了综合评价模型,从观赏性、生长特性及适应性三方面筛选出12个评价因子,对30种藤本植物(含品种)进行露地栽培试验,对其适生性进行综合评价,以判断其在上海应用的可行性。结果表明,攀爬能力、花期长短、越夏能力、抗病虫害能力和栽培养护难易是影响开花藤本在上海应用的主要因子。根据AHP评价结果,将30个种(品种)划分为3个等级:I级包括藤本月季“红双喜”(Rosa “Double Delight”)、藤本月季“光谱”(Rosa “Spectra”)、藤本月季“安吉拉”(Rosa “Angela”)、藤本月季“粉龙”(Rosa “Pierre de Ronsard”)、凌霄“弗拉门戈”(Campsis grandiflora “Flamenge”)、美国凌霄(Campsis radicans)、美国凌霄“嘉宝”(Campsis radicans “Jiabao”)、美国凌霄“弗拉瓦”(Campsis radicans “Fulawa”)、宿根牵牛(Ipomoea indica)和红萼苘麻(Abutilon megapotamicum)等10个优良观赏种类,可大量推广应用;II级包括双喜藤(Mandevilla laxa)、意大利络石藤(Trachelospermum jasminoides)、香花崖豆藤(Millettia dielsiana Harms)、紫藤“丰花”(Wisteria sinensis “Prolific”)、金钩吻(Gelsemium sempervirens)和重瓣黄木香(Rosa banksiae)等13个品种,园林中可与花期长的种类配合应用;III级包含7个品种,园林应用价值较低,建议少量应用。
In order to promote the garden application of flowering vines in Shanghai, a comprehensive evaluation model was established based on Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), and 12 evaluation factors were selected from the three aspects of ornamentation, growth characteristics and adaptability. Twenty species of vines (including varieties) were cultivated in open field, and their suitability was comprehensively evaluated to judge the feasibility of their application in Shanghai. The results showed that climbing ability, the length of flowering period, the ability to pass summer, resistance to pests and diseases, and the difficulty of cultivation and maintenance are the main factors affecting the application of flowering vines in Shanghai. According to the results of AHP evaluation, 30 species and varieties are divided into 3 grades: Grade I includes 10 ornamental species, such as Rosa “Double Delight”, Rosa “Spectra”, Rosa “Angela”, Rosa “Pierre de Ronsard”, Campsis grandiflora, Campsis radicans, Campsis radicans “Jiabao”, Campsis radicans “Fulawa”, Ipomoea indica and Abutilon megapotamicum, which can be widely promoted and applied; Grade II includes 13 ornamental species, such as Mandevilla laxa, Trachelospermum jasminoides, Millettia dielsiana Harms, Wisteria floribunda “Prolific”, Gelsemium sempervirens and Rosa banksiae, which can be used in gardens with long flowering species; Grade III includes 7 species, which have low garden application value and can be applied in small amounts.

References

[1]  江丽萍. 商业空间中墙体景观化研究[J]. 上海商业, 2011(21): 54-57.
[2]  何梅, 胡玉安, 梅雅茹, 何素琳, 朱仔伟. 城市住宅小区“立体绿化”景观设计探析[J]. 南方林业科学, 2015, 43(5): 58-62, 65.
[3]  武金翠, 张鲜鲜, 潘文明, 周军. 苏州市立体绿化植物调查及其应用形式比较分析[J]. 上海农业学报, 2014, 30(6): 123-127.
[4]  廖容, 崔洁, 卓春丽, 高素萍. 成都市32种立体绿化植物降温增湿效应比较研究[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2012, 40(6): 178-181.
[5]  黄旭兵. 城市立体绿化主打曲——攀援植物的应用[J]. 南方农业, 2010, 4(4): 29-32.
[6]  杨博. 上海市“十三五”期间立体绿化的发展趋势探究[J]. 绿色科技, 2016(7): 57-60.
[7]  童开林, 熊安华. 藤本植物在城市立体绿化中的应用[J]. 陕西林业科技, 2013(3): 106-108.
[8]  谢东升, 张弯弯, 李仕裕, 王永淇, 刘颂颂, 莫罗坚, 等. 23种野生野牡丹科植物引种和综合评价[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2019, 47(14): 164-169.
[9]  曾晓阳, 柳林安, 高永恒. 成都市空间立体绿化藤本植物的选择[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2012, 27(1): 196-200.
[10]  刘欣玲, 李青, 孔雨光. 济南地区木质藤本绿化植物的综合评价[J]. 山东林业科技, 2014, 44(2): 30-32.
[11]  戴中武, 沈立民, 吴小倩, 黄元贞, 翟俊文, 吴沙沙. 基于层次分析法对十六种独蒜兰属植物观赏价值综合评价[J]. 北方园艺, 2020(5): 73-79.
[12]  刘安成, 王庆, 李淑娟, 尉倩, 柏国清, 王宏. 西安地区忍冬属藤本植物观赏性状综合评价[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2017, 32(4): 274-278.
[13]  陆景伟, 刘剑飞, 郭军, 王远会, 徐进. 锦屏藤在重庆地区的适应性研究及观赏性初步评价[J]. 西南农业学报, 2012, 25(6): 2258-2262.
[14]  刘毅. 陕西主要栽培银杏的观赏性状评价研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2007: 10-12.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133