先行行为导致的不作为犯罪
Crime of Omission Caused by Prior Behavior

与作为犯罪积极主动的行为样态相比较，不作为犯罪的消极性和隐蔽性使得其在实务当中难以辨别，尤其是先行行为导致的不作为犯罪。德国著名刑法学家斯特贝尔首次提出的先行行为作为不作为犯罪的义务来源之一的说法目前虽未纳入我国的刑法典，但这一理论已被我国刑法界所广泛认可，要深刻研究先行行为导致的不作为犯罪就必须首先了解不作为犯罪的定义、特点以及义务来源，对先行行为导致的不作为犯罪理论的研究深度体现了一个国家刑法体系的水平，同时也体现了一个国家在规范打击犯罪和保障人权之间的平衡程度，是研究不作为犯罪，完善刑法体系，明确刑法未来在不作为犯罪方面的改革方向的必经之路。
Compared with the active behavior as a crime, the negativity and concealment of inaction makes it difficult to distinguish in practice, especially the crime of inaction caused by prior behavior. Alt-hough it is not included in the criminal code of our country that the leading act first proposed by the famous German criminal law scientist Stebel as one of the sources of the obligation of non-criminal, this theory has been widely recognized by the criminal law community in our country, and we must deeply study the first For the crime of omission caused by behavior, we must first understand the definition, characteristics and source of obligation of the crime of omission. The depth of research on the theory of omission caused by prior behavior reflects the level of a country’s criminal law system and also reflects a country’s regulation. The degree of balance between fighting crime and protect-ing human rights is the only way to study the crime of inaction, improve the criminal law system, and clarify the direction of criminal law reform in terms of inaction in the future.