|
六种不同前处理方法对陕北砂黄土粒度测量的影响
|
Abstract:
不同前处理方法对沉积物粒度测试结果的真实性具有十分重要的作用。采取6种不同的前处理方法对陕北砂黄土运用激光粒度仪进行测量,探讨不同前处理方法对粒度测量的影响,以获取砂黄土准确的粒度分布情况。结果表明:经方法A和方法E处理后得到的黏粒含量平均值较大,分别为6.38%和6.10%;方法C和方法F的平均粒径Φ值都较小,分别为5.21Φ和5.08Φ,经过超声波、分散剂和HCl处理后的得到的黏粒含量不是真实的粒度测量结果。砂黄土中的有机质会对粒度测量产生较大影响,方法D得到的黏粒含量较小,为6.17%,粉砂粒含量较大,为69.19%,表明经过处理后细粒组分百分含量减少。单独加入H2O2的前处理方法得到的黏粒含量最多(6.75%),平均粒径最细(5.29Φ),分选性最差(1.82),偏度最大(0.43);与其他方法相比,分散效果更好。单独加入H2O2的前处理方法(文中B方法)粒度分散效果最好,更适用砂黄土的粒度测量。
Different pretreatment methods play a very important role in the authenticity of sediment particle size test results. This paper adopted six different pretreatment methods to measure the grain size of sandy loess in northern Shaanxi Province by laser particle size analyzer, and the influence of different pre-treatments on grain size distribution was discussed. The results showed that the average clay content after treatment by method A and method E was larger, 6.38% and 6.10%, respectively; the average particle diameter Φ value of method C and method F are both smaller, 5.21Φ and 5.08 respectively Φ, the content of clay particles after ultrasonic, dispersant and HCl treatment is not the true particle size measurement result. The organic matter in the sandy loess will have a greater influence on the grain size measurement. The clay content obtained D the method is small, 6.17 and the silt content is 69.19, which indicates that the percentage content of fine grained component decreases after treatment. The pre-treatment method with H2O2 addition alone obtained the most clay content, which was 6.75%, and the average particle size was the coarsest, which was 5.29Φ, and the sorting coefficient and skewness were also the largest, which were 1.82 and 0.43, respectively. Compared with other methods, the median particle size was larger, the content of coarse particles was reduced, the content of fine particles was increased, the particle size become finer, and the dispersion effect was better. Therefore, the pretreatment method of adding H2O2 alone (method B in the paper) was more suitable for grain size measurement of sandy loess.
[1] | 董光荣, 李保生, 高尚玉, 等. 鄂尔多斯高原的第四纪古风成沙[J]. 地理学报, 1983, 38(4): 341-347, 450-451. |
[2] | 董光荣, 靳鹤龄, 陈惠忠. 末次间冰期以来沙漠–黄土边界带移动与气候变化[J]. 第四纪研究, 1997(2): 63-65, 67-72. |
[3] | 丁仲礼, 孙继敏, 刘东生. 联系沙漠–黄土演变过程中耦合关系的沉积学指标[J]. 中国科学(D辑: 地球科学), 1999, 29(1): 82-87. |
[4] | 任明达. 现代沉积环境概论[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1981. |
[5] | 鹿化煜, 安芷生. 前处理方法对黄土沉积物粒度测量影响的实验研究[J]. 科学通报, 1997, 42(23): 2535-2538. |
[6] | 雷国良, 张虎才, 张文翔, 等. Mastersize2000型激光粒度仪分析数据可靠性检验及意义——以洛川剖面S4层古土壤为例[J]. 沉积学报, 2006, 24(4): 531-539. |
[7] | 孙有斌, 高抒, 鹿化煜. 前处理方法对北黄海沉积物粒度的影响[J]. 海洋与湖沼, 2001, 32(6): 665-671. |
[8] | 李金凤, 鲁瑞洁, 贾飞飞. 前处理方法对青海湖地区全新世风成沉积物粒度测量的影响[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2016, 30(1): 141-146. |
[9] | 董应巍. 冰川沉积物粒度实验的对比与分析[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 大连: 辽宁师范大学, 2014. |
[10] | 杨玉颖, 解庆红, 赵红, 等. LS230激光粒度仪及其应用[J]. 现代科学仪器, 2002(3): 41-43. |
[11] | 王力, 李喜安, 洪勃, 等. 前处理方法对马兰黄土粒度测量影响的实验研究[J]. 地球与环境, 2018, 46(2): 210-217. |
[12] | 鹿化煜, 苗晓东, 孙有斌. 前处理步骤与方法对风成红粘土粒度测量的影响[J]. 海洋地质与第四纪地质, 2002, 22(3): 129-135. |
[13] | 张红艳, 鹿化煜, 赵军, 等. 超声波振荡对细颗粒黄土样品粒度测量影响的实验分析[J]. 沉积学报, 2008, 26(3): 494-500. |
[14] | 庞奖励, 乔晶, 黄春长, 等. 前处理过程对汉江上游谷地“古土壤”粒度测试结果的影响研究[J]. 地理科学, 2013, 33(6): 748-754. |
[15] | 刘海丽, 韩志勇, 李徐生, 等. 不同前处理方法对南方红土粒度测量的影响——以安徽宣城第四纪红土剖面为例[J]. 海洋地质与第四纪地质, 2012, 32(2): 161-167. |
[16] | 胡宗杰, 颜佳新, 韩鸿印. 湖泊沉积物粒度分析前处理过程中絮凝现象的消除方法研究[J]. 湖泊科学, 2013, 25(2): 243-249. |
[17] | 任少芳, 郑祥民, 艾东升, 等. 不同前处理方法对下蜀黄土粒度测量的影响[J]. 海洋地质与第四纪地质, 2014, 34(3): 185-194. |
[18] | 王君波, 朱立平. 不同前处理对湖泊沉积物粒度测量结果的影响[J]. 湖泊科学, 2005, 17(1): 17-23. |
[19] | 赵启, 安萍, 于禄鹏, 等. 有机质去除程度对度测量结果的影响及其意义[J]. 聊城大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 29(4): 39-45. |
[20] | 徐树建, 杜忠花. 激光粒度仪测量风成堆积物粒度的实验研究[J]. 水土保持研究, 2007, 14(2): 209-212. |
[21] | 刘东生. 黄河中游黄土[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1964: 200-201. |
[22] | 张永双, 曲永新. 陕北晋西砂黄土的胶结物与胶结作用研究[J]. 工程地质学报, 2005, 13(1): 18-28. |
[23] | Udden, J.A. (1898) The Merchanical Composition of Wind Deposits. Agustana Library Publications, Rock Island, 3(1): 1-69. |
[24] | Wentworth, C.K. (1922) A Scale of Grade and Class Terms for Clastic Sediments. Journal of Geology, 30, 377-392.
https://doi.org/10.1086/622910 |
[25] | 鹿化煜, 安芷生. 黄土高原黄土粒度组成的古气候意义[J]. 中国科学(D辑), 1998, 28(3): 278-283. |
[26] | Folk, R.L. and Ward, W.C. (1957) Brazos River Bar: A Study in the Significance of Grain Size Parameters. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, 27, 3-26. https://doi.org/10.1306/74D70646-2B21-11D7-8648000102C1865D |
[27] | 孙东怀. 黄土粒度分布中的超细粒组分及其成因[J]. 第四纪研究, 2006, 26(6): 928-936. |
[28] | 孙东怀, 鹿化煜, David Rea, 等. 中国黄土粒度的双峰分布及其古气候意义[J]. 沉积学报, 2000, 18(3): 327-335. |
[29] | 刁桂仪, 文启忠. 黄土中的有机质[J]. 地理科学, 1988, 8(3): 226-231. |
[30] | 苏志珠, 刘蓉, 梁爱民, 等. 晋西北沙化土地土壤机械组成与有机质的初步研究[J]. 水土保持研究, 2018, 25(6): 61-67. |