初中生、高中生与大学生的时间洞察力比较研究
A Comparative Study on the Time Perspective of Junior High School Students, High School Students and College Students

DOI: 10.12677/AP.2021.113097, PP. 846-852

Keywords: 时间洞察力，ZTPI，年龄差异
Time Perspective, ZTPI, Age Characteristics

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

时间洞察力是个体在时间维度上的一种人格特质，具有一定的发展趋势和年龄特征。本研究采用津巴多时间观量表测量3个不同年龄阶段的样本群体(初中生、高中生、大学生)在时间洞察力5个维度上的水平，并比较不同年龄阶段在各维度上的表现差异。结果发现：1) 高中生在过去消极时间观上的得分显著高于初中生和大学生，初中生和大学生之间没有显著差异；2) 高中生在现在享乐时间观上的得分显著高于初中生，大学生与初、高中生之间差异均不显著；3) 初中生在现在宿命时间观上的得分显著低于高中生和大学生，高中生和大学生之间的得分没有显著差异。上述研究结果说明时间洞察力在不同年龄群体间存在差异，个体的时间洞察力具有发展性。
Time perspective is a personality trait of individuals in time dimension, which has certain devel-opment trend and age characteristics. The present study used ZTPI (Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory) to measure and compare the performance of three sample groups (junior high school students, senior high school students and college students) in five dimensions of the time perspective. The results show that: 1) The scores of senior high school students in the past-negative time perspective are significantly higher than junior high school students and college students, and there is no significant difference between junior high school students and college students; 2) The scores of senior high school students in the present-hedonistic time perspective are significantly higher than junior high school students, and there is no significant difference between college students and junior high school students/senior high school students; 3) The scores of junior high school students in the present-fatalistic time perspective are significantly lower than senior high school students, there is no significant difference between senior high school students and college students. The above results support that there are differences in time perspective among different age groups and individual time perspective is developmental.

References

[1]	杜刚, 吕厚超(2017). 青少年未来时间洞察力和学业成绩的关系: 时间管理倾向的中介作用. 心理科学, 40(1), 96-102.
[2]	黄希庭(1994). 未来时间的心理结构. 心理学报, 26(2), 121-127.
[3]	黄希庭(2004). 论时间洞察力. 心理科学, 27(1), 5-7.
[4]	黄希庭, 张志杰, 凤四海, 郭秀艳, 吕厚超, 陈莹(2005). 时间心理学的新探索. 心理科学, 28(6), 1284-1287.
[5]	吕厚超(2006). 青年学生过去时间洞察力研究. 博士学位论文, 重庆: 西南大学. https://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?dbname=CDFD0911&filename=2006192800.nh
[6]	吕厚超, 黄希庭(2005). 时间洞察力的理论研究. 心理科学进展, 13(1), 27-32.
[7]	庄妍, 张典兵(2015). 大学生未来时间洞察力与主观幸福感: 学习投入的中介效应II. 教育评论, (7), 85-87.
[8]	Beiser, M., & Hyman, I. (1997). Refugees’ Time Perspective and Mental Health. American Journal of Psychiatry, 154, 996-1002. https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.154.7.996
[9]	Boniwell I., & Zimbardo, P. G. (2004). Balancing One’s Time Perspective in Pursuit of Optimal Functioning. In P. A. Linley, & S. Joseph (Eds.), Positive Psychology in Practice (pp. 165-178). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470939338.ch10
[10]	Gorman, B. S., & Wessman, A. E. (1977). The Personal Experience of Time. New York: Plenum Press.
[11]	Kastenbaum, R. (1963). Cognitive and Personal Futurity in Later Life. Journal of Individual Psychology, 19, 216-222.
[12]	Klineberg, S. L. (1967). Changes in Outlook on the Future between Childhood and Adolescence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 7, 185-193. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0024988
[13]	Lessing, E. E. (1968). Demographic, Developmental, and Personality Correlates of Length of Future Time Perspective (ftp) 1. Journal of Personality, 36, 183-201. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1968.tb01468.x
[14]	Tismer, K. G. (1987). Psychological Aspects of Temporal Dominance during Adolescence. Psychological Reports, 61, 647-654. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1987.61.2.647
[15]	Zhi, K., Yang, J., Chen, Y., Akebaijiang, N., & Zhang, S. (2021). The Relationship between Future Time Perspective and Psychological Violence among Chinese College Students. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article ID: 585837. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.585837
[16]	Zimbardo, P. G., & Boyd, J. (1999). Putting Time in Perspective: A Valid, Reliable Individual-Differences Metric. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1271-1288. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1271

Full-Text