|
Modern Linguistics 2021
垃圾分类政策宣传中的话语秩序和话语互动——以上海垃圾分类为例
|
Abstract:
出于生态发展的要求和对环境保护的重视,上海市率先实行垃圾分类,并通过立法的方式来推进,垃圾分类进入了强制时代。以批评话语分析为研究视角,选取《上海市生活垃圾全程分类宣传指导手册》和《上海市生活垃圾分类宣传语手册》作为语料,运用费尔克劳(Fairclough)关于话语和社会实践辩证关系的论述和研究方法,从话语秩序和话语互动两个方面,探究话语对垃圾分类这一社会实践的建构作用。研究发现,垃圾分类的社会实践是率先通过官方宣传的话语来建构并推动的,官方话语与民间话语充分表达,良性互动,互动中隐含了权力关系的博弈,但益处论等因素使得垃圾分类这一社会实践得以顺利实施。
Ecological and environmental concerns have prompted Shanghai to take the lead in carrying out garbage classification and the municipal authorities implement it through legislation, so garbage classification practice in Shanghai is compulsory. From the perspective of critical discourse analysis, this paper selects as data Shanghai’s publicity instruction manual and slogan brochure for household garbage classification, and applies Fairclough’s dialectical view of discourse and social practice to investigate, by examining its order of discourse and discourse interaction, the role of discourse in constructing the social practice of garbage classification. It is found that garbage classification is firstly constructed and promoted through official discourse, which interacts with citizen discourse with power relations involved, but the topoi of benefit make garbage classification accepted as social practice.
[1] | 田海龙. 语篇研究: 范畴、视角、方法[M]. 上海: 上海外语教育出版社, 2009. |
[2] | 叶岚, 陈奇星. 城市生活垃圾处理的政策分析与路径选择——以上海实践为例[J]. 上海行政学院学报, 2017, 18(2): 69-77. |
[3] | 张璐, 谭刚. 公共政策执行中目标群体与执行部门的利益博弈分析——以广州市垃圾分类新规为例[J]. 中共南京市委党校学报, 2014(6): 43-46. |
[4] | 蒋叶莎. 基于网络舆情分析的垃圾分类问题研究[J]. 中国环境管理干部学院学报, 2019(5): 59-62. |
[5] | 周裕琼, 蒋小艳. 环境抗争的话语建构、选择与传承[J]. 深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2014, 31(3): 131-140. |
[6] | 艾鹏亚, 李武. 媒介使用如何影响垃圾分类行为?——以媒介依赖类型为调节的双中介模型[J]. 新闻记者, 2019(10): 55-62. |
[7] | 王泗通. 破解垃圾分类困境的社区经验及其优化[J]. 浙江工商大学学报, 2019, 33(3): 121-128. |
[8] | 苏祖鹏, 朱艳艳. 城市生活垃圾分类制度存在的问题及法律对策——以福建省为视角[J]. 漳州师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版), 2013, 27(3): 38-43. |
[9] | 田海龙, 单晓静. 政府部门通知中的权威及其话语建构[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2020, 42(4): 24-35. |
[10] | Fairclough, N. (2001) The Discourse of New Labour: Critical Discourse Analysis. In: Tian, H.L. and Zhao, P., Eds., Critical Discourse Analysis: Essential Readings, Nankai University Press, Tianjin, 181-225. |
[11] | Fairclough, N. (2003) Analyzing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. Routledge, London and New York.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203697078 |
[12] | Fairclough, N. (1995) Critical Discourse Analysis. Longman, London, 10. |
[13] | Reisigl, M. & Wodak, R. (2009) The Discourse-Historical Approach (DHA). In: Wodak, R. and Meyer, M., Eds., Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis (Second Edition), Peking University Press, Beijing, 87-121. |
[14] | Wodak, R. (2001) The Discourse-Historical Approach. In: Tian, H.L. and Zhao, P., Eds., Critical Analysis: Essential Readings, Nankai University Press, Tianjin, 226-262. |
[15] | Wodak, R. (2007) Pragmatic and Critical Discourse Analysis: A Cross-Disciplinary Inquiry. Pragmatics and Cognition, 15, 203-225. https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.15.1.13wod |
[16] | Thompson, G. (2008) Introducing Functional Grammar. Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press, Beijing, 75. |
[17] | 李战子. 评价理论: 在话语分析中的应用和问题[J]. 外语研究, 2004(5): 1-6+80. |