|
抗滑桩或桩板墙桩底支承错误选用的设计风险
|
Abstract:
抗滑桩和桩板墙设计计算时,很多规范认为嵌入岩石较深时可选用自由或铰接,个别规范甚至支持固定。本文通过Midas civil软件模拟抗滑桩计算,讨论桩底自由、铰接和固定不同约束的计算结果差异,并提出支承错误选用的风险,建议规范对桩底约束宜采用自由端进行计算,尤其是在变形控制时应采
In the design and calculation of anti-slide piles and pile walls, many codes believe that when the rock is embedded in deep, free joints or hinge joints can be used, and some codes even support fixing. In this paper, the calculation of anti-slide piles is simulated by Midas-Civil software geotechnical calculation. The differences in the calculation results of free pile bottom, hinged pile bottom and fixed pile bottom are discussed, and the risk of wrong choice of support is put forward. It is recommended that the free end should be used in the calculation of the pile bottom constraint in the code, especially in the deformation control, the constraint of the hinged and fixed pile bottom should be deleted to avoid use the wrong model, and the actual engineering deformation is too large.
[1] | 中华人民共和国建筑行业标准. GB/T 38509-2020滑坡防治设计规范[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2020. |
[2] | 中华人民共和国建筑行业标准. DZT0219-2006滑坡防治工程设计与施工技术规范[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2006. |
[3] | 黄小鹏, 杨树宝, 刘光华, 郭映忠. 嵌岩抗滑桩端支撑条件有限元分析[J]. 重庆交通大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 30(增刊1): 526-529. |
[4] | 黄钏鑫, 唐家富, 王升堂. 通用有限元模拟抗滑桩或桩板墙计算[J]. 土木工程, 2020, 9(4): 321-329. |
[5] | 中华人民共和国交通行业标准. JTG D30-2015公路路基设计规范[S]. 北京: 人民交通出版社股份有限公司, 2015. |