|
蛋白免疫印迹和全自动蛋白质定量分析的比较研究
|
Abstract:
目的:比较传统的蛋白免疫印迹和全自动蛋白质定量分析检测特异性蛋白质相对含量的差异,并进行方法学优化,为蛋白质定量分析提供技术参考。方法:分别使用两种系统对不同分子量的目标蛋白进行检测,比较两种系统的灵敏度、重复性和适用范围。结果:相比传统WB系统,全自动系统灵敏性、重复性和稳定性更高,并且可进行多分子同时检测,尤其在检测微量蛋白、分子量较大或较小的蛋白以及高通量方面具有优势。结论:全自动蛋白检测是一种灵敏、高效的检测特异性蛋白丰度变化的系统,值得在科研和医学检验中推广。
Objective: To compare the difference between traditional Western Blotting (WB) and automatic quantitative protein analysis on specific protein relative content , and to optimize the methodology, so as to provide technical reference for protein quantitative analysis. Methods: In order to compare the sensitivity, repeatability and applicable range of the two methods. WB and automatic quantita-tive protein analysis are used to detect the target molecules, which with different molecular weights. Results: Compared with traditional WB, WES had higher sensitivity, repeatability and stability, and can carry out multi-molecule detection, which has high throughput especially in the detection of trace proteins or proteins with larger or smaller molecular weights. Conclusion: WES is a sensitive and efficient method to detect the changes of abundance of specific protein, which is worth popular-izing in scientific research and medical examination.
[1] | 姜晨晨, 程军军, 黄梦昊, 等. 蛋白免疫印迹半定量分析在药理学研究中的影响因素[J]. 中国药学杂志, 2015, 50(9): 758-762. |
[2] | 李晓军, 秦浚川, 武建国. 蛋白印迹技术研究进展[J]. 临床检测杂志, 2004, 3(22): 227-229. |
[3] | 董燕, 张枫, 梅柱中, 等. 电转移中蛋白质的透膜现象及其对蛋白质印记结果的影响[J]. 生物化学与生物物理进展, 2002, 29(3): 449-453. |
[4] | 张龙祥, 张庭芳, 李令媛. 生化实验方法和技术[M]. 第2版. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 1992: 870-873. |
[5] | 卢圣栋. 现代分子生物学实验技术[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 1993: 403-404. |
[6] | Koller, A. and W?tzig, H. (2005) Precision and Variance Components in Quantitative Gel Electrophoresis. Electrophoresis, 26, 2470-2475. https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.200500024 |