归因风格和消极情绪对反事实思维的影响
The Influence of Attribution Style and Negative Emotion on Counterfactual Thinking

DOI: 10.12677/AP.2021.114101, PP. 886-894

Keywords: 归因风格，情绪，反事实思维
Attribution Style, Emotion, Counterfactual Thinking

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

本研究采用问卷调查和实验相结合的方式，以146名大学生为研究对象，采用2 (归因风格：乐观型、悲观型) × 2 (情绪：消极情绪，中性情绪)被试间实验设计，探讨不同归因风格个体在有无诱发消极情绪状态下反事实思维数量和方向上的差异。结果表明：1) 不同归因风格个体的上行反事实思维及反事实思维数量总量没有显著差异，但不同归因风格个体的下行反事实思维具有显著差异；2) 个体情绪不同，引起的反事实思维也有显著差异，诱发了消极情绪组的被试更容易产生反事实思维，上下行反事实思维也显著增多；3) 归因风格和情绪对反事实思维的影响没有交互作用，情绪的主效应非常显著。研究说明，消极情绪可以增加人的反事实思维，且乐观者比悲观者产生更多的下行反事实思维。
This study used a combination of questionnaire and experiment, with 146 college students as the research object, using 2 type (attribution style: optimism, pessimistic) × 2 (mood: negative emotions, neutral emotions) subjects between design of experiment, to explore different individual in the presence of induce negative emotion state attribution style differences in number of counterfactual thinking and direction. The results show that: 1) There is no significant difference in upward counterfactual thinking and quantity of counterfactual thinking among individuals with different attribution styles, but there is significant difference in downward counterfactual thinking among individuals with different attribution styles; 2) Different individual emotions lead to significant differences in counterfactual thinking. Participants in the negative emotion group are more likely to produce counterfactual thinking, and there is a significant increase in upstream and downstream counterfactual thinking. 3) There is no interaction between attributional style and emotion on counterfactual thinking, and the main effect of emotion is very significant. The research shows that negative emotions can increase people’s counterfactual thinking, and optimists produce more downward counterfactual thinking than pessimists.

References

[1]	仇云霞, 张璐, 桑青松(2011). 国内外反事实思维研究的现状与展望. 大众科技, 14(3), 134-135.
[2]	杜学礼(2009). 归因风格及情绪对组织公正感形成的影响. 硕士论文, 上海: 华东师范大学.
[3]	樊斌, 卢宁, 王丹(2019). 反事实思维相关研究进展. 心理学进展, 9(5), 946-954.
[4]	高学德(2013). 大学生心理控制源与内疚感和羞耻感对反事实思维的影响. 心理发展与教育, 29(2), 159-165.
[5]	李杨(2008). 大学生情绪、人格类型与反事实思维的关系研究. 硕士论文, 长春: 东北师范大学.
[6]	卢家楣, 孙俊才, 刘伟(2008). 诱发负性情绪时人际情绪调节与个体情绪调节对前瞻记忆的影响. 心理学报, 40(12), 1258-1265
[7]	马建苓, 刘畅, 符明秋(2017). 情绪影响冲突加工的认知神经机制. 心理科学进展, 25(1), 49-58.
[8]	彭聃龄(2012). 普通心理学. 北京: 北京师范大学出版社.
[9]	卿素兰, 方富熹(2006). 反事实思维与情绪的关系. 中国心理卫生杂志, 20(10), 692-694.
[10]	韦炜(2008). 归因方式与反事实思维的关系研究. 硕士论文, 广州: 华南师范大学.
[11]	谢杰爽(2012). 不同情绪状态下调控方式与生活取向对反事实思维的影响. 硕士论文, 开封: 河南大学.
[12]	于燕(2014). 大学生归因方式与抑郁、焦虑的关系研究. 硕士论文, 荆州: 长江大学.
[13]	张大均(2002). 教育心理学. 北京: 人民教育出版社.
[14]	Dalgleish, T. (2004). What Might Not Have Been: An Investigation of the Nature of Counterfactual Thinking in Survivors of Trauma. Psychological Medicine, 34, 1215-1225. https://doi.org/10.1017/S003329170400193X
[15]	Johnson, M. K., Sherman, S. J., Sorrentino, R. M., & Higgins, E. T. (1990). Constructing and Reconstructing the Past and the Future in the Present. In Handbook of Motivation and Cognition: Foundations of Social Behavior (pp. 482-526). New York: The Guilford Press.
[16]	Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1982). The Simulation Heuristic (pp. 201-208). New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511809477.015
[17]	Markman, K. D., Gavanski, I., Sherman, S. J., & McMullen, M. N. (1993). The Mental Simulation of Better and Worse Possible Worlds. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 29, 87-109. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1993.1005
[18]	Markman, K. D., McMullen, M. N., & Elizaga, R. A. (2008). Counterfactual Thinking, Persistence and Performance: A Test of the Reflection and Evaluation Model. Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 421-428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2007.01.001

Full-Text