Is it Lawful that Philosophy Discusses ‘Truth’?

As in the whole tradition of revelation, as well as information about morality and metaphysics, individuals have some duties and responsibilities in Islam. It is evident that religious texts should be handled as a whole in order to achieve healthier results because of the interrelation of the issues in the content. However, the diversity and depth in the subjects they contain have been required the study of religious texts in different scientific disciplines over time. Fiqh among these disciplines discusses the duties and responsibilities of the individual in general. In this sense, it categorizes all the actions of individuals as what should be done and what to avoid in religious terms. In addition, to tell them what they are free to do enter into the definition of duty of Fiqh. The need to examine religious texts by different disciplines is a technical and compulsory situation which does not mean that the relationship between these disciplines is completely eliminated. Because the jurisprudence acknowledges religious texts those are the starting point of Fiqh's duty as the source of legitimacy. But it is never intellectually interested in discussing the arguments and issues of those resources. Because this mission is undertaken by “Kalam”. On the one hand Kalam responds to the opponents, on the other hand it puts forward the concept of truth/religion. This is the notion of truth, at the same time, is the basis of legitimacy for fiqh. Therefore, the fiqh carries out all its activity in the light of this conception. The concept of verdict that constitutes the backbone of the whole activity is defined by Ghazali according to the concept of the truth of Esharite School. The truth/religion is also the subject for philosophy. However, there is a very important methodical distinctness between philosophy and Kalam. While the former does not give any guarantee for the result, the results of the latter are never found to contradict with the present/given truth. In terms of logic, while Kalam puts forward the propositions in keeping with the result, philosophy tries to reach the result in following its premises. But this does not mean that philosophy and religion can never be reconciled in the same truth. However it is also clear that those who will adopt the philosophical method should always face to lose the truth. On the other hand, this would mean to dispute the legitimacy of the fiqh. Therefore, at first glance the negative Fiqh's negative attitude to philosophy can be seen pretty neutral. This is the Fiqh's literature, which clearly reveals the approach of