THE ANALYSIS OF THE STORY “VAV’LAR” BY SABAHATTIN KUDRET AKSAL FROM THE POINT OF VIEW OF SEMIOTICS (ACCOMPANIED BY THE ORGANON MODEL BüHLER), WITHIN THE DIVERGENCE VIEW OF JOHN R. SEARLE AND IN THE CONTEXT OF THE SPEECH ACT THEORY

As a discipline of which terminological foundations have not been solidified in Turkish, semiotics is undoubtedly able to present excellent possibilities of analysis to many stories. The author's transition to the pragmatic level will undoubtedly increase the literary value of the text. However, this is only possible with a metaphorical analysis. Namely, there is a great consistency between the type A metaphor and placing the text on the pragmatic level. Semiotic analysis requires metaphorical assessment; therefore, it is imperative to master the terminology of semiotics. It will be best to start the analysis not only with the transition of sembol and simge, but also with the changes the signifier goes through in the layer between reader and sign. Because every element used by people to think, is in fact a sign. As long as the role of the signs while creating a text is not limited with the text and the sign can be anatomized, the metaphorical continuity can be guaranteed. This operation is both simple and complicated, both commonplace and out of the ordinary. To experience this, we will use Bühler’s Organon-model, the Divergence view of Searle, and the possibilities of analysis of the speech act in the story “Vav’lar”. Especially the differences between locutionary, illocutionary and perlocutionary acts will facilitate the understanding of the pragmatic level