Some ？adiths Subjected to Discussion by Supporters of Bishr al-Marīsī Due to Having an Anthropormorphist and Corporealist Content

？adiths that have been discussed in this paper consist of narrations regarding divine attributes and having some problematic meanings between supporters of Bishr al-Marīsī and ？Uthmān al-Dārimī. These narrations were mostly accepted denounced (munkar) by Bishr al-Marīsī and his supporters due to having an anthropormophist and corporealist content about God. They rejected divine attributes according to their understanding of God based on incomparability (tanzīh) which provided by Mutazilite approach towards divine attributes even though they conveyed some features of Ahl al-Ra’y. They found contradicted of attributing human features to God based on their tanzīhunderstanding, therefore, they interpreted such this kind of narrations in terms of their approach or rejected at all. At the other hand, a hard ？adith scholar Uthman al-Darimi believed that one should accept divine attributes as they are in the Qur？ān and Sunna. According to his belief, he considered the explicit meanings of the narrations without interpretation of divine attributes, and based on his perpective he denied Bishr al-Marīsī (d. 218 /833) and his supporters’ interpretations claiming they would cause divesting God of all attributes (ta’tīl). He argues that these narrations should be taken into considerations based on their explicit meanings. The discussions on these ？adiths are important due to showing different approaches of scholars from the schools of Ahl al-Ra？y and the ones from Ahl al-？adith towards the ？adith during the period when the main ？adith works were collected. Discussions on the narrations studied in this paper reveal two schools’ understandings of divine issues, their approaches to divine attributes, as well inform us their perspectives of ？adith in general. Summary The present paper examines the debates between ？Uthmān al-Dārimī (d. 280/894) and the supporters of Bishr al-Marīsī (d. 218/833) on the divine attributes mentioned in some ？adiths in the period when the main ？adith books were composed (i.e., III/IXth century). These debates that took place between the scholars of Ahl al-？adith and Ahl al-Ra’y concern the understanding and interpretation of the ？adiths in a certain way. It could be stated that the debates focus on how the ？adiths should be understood, or whether it is the explicit meaning of the words or the possible methaphorical meanings beyond them that should be considered. It is worth briefly introducing the parties who discussed the ？adiths studied here. The aforementioned discussions about some ？adith narrations are between the supporters of Bishr