The Comperative Analysis of the Concept of Euthanasia in regard to Teleology, Deontology and Meta-Ethic

Modern-day individuals exist within a cultural process; in which society’s dynamics are simultaneously determined either by being similarised or distilled. Now that the process of segregation or integration is dominated by the cultural industry, the need for cultural navigations are needed more than ever if an individual to complete the process of building an identity or a significant belonging. If the individual aspire to distinguish between; good/bad, right/wrong or beneficial/vain - in an ever going salvo of informatics, he/she must comprehend the owned systematic idea in detail and ensure a sceptical, consistent and sustainable vision. This complexity and transitivity make the facts and events harder to understand. The purpose of this article is to help the individual to choose between many right acts; what’s best for his/her identity or fitting to a societal being. Ethics is a state of affairs which deputise right and wrong acts in regard to social and humanitarian level. This article is written to emphasis on the noncontradiction in individual’s process of interpretation - regarding to his/her self and environment’s different approach of right and coherent. Article will analyse the 3 basic ethics theory in today’s inter-disciplinary ethical discussion within the notion of euthanasia concept. In the article, I will examine which one’s euthanasia concept is ethical, which one’s not and which one adapts a vague or vagabond approach