全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
-  2019 

Critic of the Book Named “?ank?r?’n?n Tarihi ve Kültürel Miras? (XI-XX. Yüzy?l)”

Keywords: ?ank?r?,mimari,y?ntem,ele?tiri,?izim

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

This article attempts to make a critic about the book which the publication info was given (Demirba?, U?ur (2018), ?ank?r?’n?n Tarihi ve Kültürel Miras? (XI - XX. Yüzy?l), ?deal Kültür Yay?nc?l?k, ?stanbul). The book has been presented as a master’s degree thesis prior to this. Later it was published as a book with a new tile and minor changes to the text. The Turkish architectural monuments consisting of mosques, fountains, madrasahs, tombs, etc. in ?ank?r? are introduced in a catalogue system, and a brief evaluation is presented. Every scientific study may have shortcomings. But when it becomes a published book it is expected to have these shortcomings remedied and have more developed interpretations. But this book has problems over permissible levels about dating the buildings with unknown dates, in the evaluation section, and its drawings. All the drawings were used from books, the author has not drawn one. Out of 113 buildings 86 of them has no drawings. The drawings were used in a schematic manner with hand drawing over the lines of the original drawing. Since the drawings were referred to their owners, readers may think that this was the way they were used in the original work. Thus, this gives me the right to make a statement over this since drawings from one of my articles were also used like the other authors who were referred. This article aims to note on the methodological mistakes such as rarely referring to the sources among the text which were included in the bibliography, using the information from these sources without questioning them, and have the young researchers not to do these same mistakes

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133