|
- 2018
Criticism of Curcānī by Kemālpas?hazādah in the problem of eternity of possibility and possibility of eternityKeywords: Felsefe,Kelam,Metafizik, ?mkan,Mümkün,Varl?k- Mahiyet,Ezel?lik,K?dem,Hud?s,?lem,Kemalpa?azade,?bn Kemal Abstract: The problem of eternity of possibility and possibility of eternity was first problematized by al-Ghazālī and then discussed by Fak?h?r al-Dīn al-Rāzī, Nā?ir al-Dīn al-?ūsī, ‘Adud al-Dīn al-ījī and as-Sayyid ash-Sharīf al-Jurjānī in the discussion of the hud?s and seniority of the world. The problem continued to be handled by the Ottoman theologians through the book Sharh? al-Mawa?qif. This study addresses the criticism of Curcānī by Kemalpasazade who is the one of the most important representatives of Ottoman thought life in the sixteenth century within the problem of eternity of possibility and possibility of eternity based on his work Risāle fī Tahkīk Luzūm al-?mkān li al-Mumki
|