A qualitat？ve analysis of the effects of school administrators appointment types on teachers, school administrators and education and train？ng process

In this research, opinions and views received from the current administrators and teachers about the selection and appointment process of the administrators were reviewed and made suggestions with the aim of being assigned administrators to schools based on objective measures and to contribute to the educational policies to be made in this area. According to level of satisfaction with the assignment process, effects on education and training processes at schools, effects on management processes by having information about the operation of the system. The working group consists of 27 administrators and 41 teachers working in the central province of Tokat kindergartens, primary schools, secondary schools and high schools at 2017-2018 academic education year. The study was conducted qualitative research method using maximum diversity sampling. Semi-structured interview forms were used and the interview questions were prepared after scanning the literature by taking the sub-objectives of the problem into the consideration and taking the experts opinion, data were analyzed through the content analysis method. Administrators think that the exam and appointment are transparent, fair and objective. But on the other hand, administrators stated that the selection system by examination alone is insufficient. Legislation information can be measured but communication skills, experience and competence cannot be measured and there is a lot of difference between theory and practice. On the one hand, administrators and teachers stated about the appointment system with interview that communication skills and social characteristics can be analyzed and qualifications can only be measured by interview, while on the other hand, unless there are objective criteria and the selection is made by objective commissions, the results are not objective and will not be. It reflected the study results that competence is underestimated because they think that negativities such as political pressures and favoritism were included in this process