全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

初中化学教材中实验的比较研究——以“人教版”和“鲁教版”为例
A Comparative Study of Experimental Contents in Junior High School Chemistry Textbooks—Taking the Textbooks Published by People’s Education Press and Shandong Education Press as Examples

DOI: 10.12677/AE.2021.112054, PP. 331-341

Keywords: 初中化学实验,教材比较,实验比较,人民教育出版社,山东教育出版社
Chemical Experiments of Junior High School
, Textbook Comparison, Experimental Comparison, People’s Education Press, Shandong Education Press

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

化学实验是学生探索物质性质和反应现象的内容载体,对化学教材中的实验进行对比研究具有重要意义。本文采用文献研究法、对比分析法对人民教育出版社(简称“人教版”)和山东教育出版社(简称“鲁教版”)初中化学教材中的实验进行对比研究。在阐述了教材比较研究的现状后,对两个版本教材中的实验进行分类,从数量上进行总体分析;根据五类实验的目的、难度及数量等因素进行详细的对比分析,发现人教版和鲁教版教材各有优劣。建议教材编写者多设计一些激发学生兴趣的实验、给出简单的实验图示或引导;建议中学教师多参考不同教材,充分利用不同教材的实验,物尽其用,收获更多。
Chemical experiments in textbooks are the content carriers for students to explore material properties and reaction phenomena, thus it is of great significance to carry out comparative study on experiments in chemical textbooks. This paper makes a comparative study of the experiments in junior high school chemistry textbooks for Grade 9 between People’s Education Press (PEP) and Shandong Education Press (SEP) by means of literature research and comparative analysis. After expounding the current situation of comparative study of teaching materials, the experiments in the two versions of teaching materials are classified and analyzed in quantity. According to the purpose, difficulty and quantity of the five kinds of experiments, a detailed comparative analysis is made. Furthermore, the differences and advantages and disadvantages between the compilation of PEP and SEP are obtained. It is suggested that the textbook compilers design more experiments to stimulate students’ interest, and give simple experimental illustrations or guidance. We sincerely proposed that teachers can refer to different textbooks and make full use of the experiments in different textbooks so as to let all things serve their proper purpose.

References

[1]  杨平苹. 中美高中化学教材“有机化学”部分的对比研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 开封: 河南大学, 2018.
[2]  李素馨, 陈燕, 梁瑞峰. 中美化学教科书中化学史比较研究[J]. 中学化学教学参考, 2018(11): 35-37.
[3]  吴芳. 中新两国中学化学教材部分实验对比研究——以中国人教版教材和新加坡《Discover Chemistry》为例[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 银川: 宁夏大学, 2018.
[4]  霍信信. 三版本初中化学教科书的比较分析及实际应用[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古师范大学, 2013.
[5]  林旺金, 张惠娇. 基于学科素养培养的初中化学教材比较研究[J]. 福建基础教学研究, 2018(1): 125-127.
[6]  王伟, 王后雄. 3个版本初中化学教科书实验栏目的比较研究[J]. 化学教育, 2015(9): 20-25.
[7]  胡巢生. 不同版本初中化学教材“学生实验活动”编写特点及教学策略[J]. 教学与管理, 2014(11): 44-47.
[8]  李世婉. 初中化学“人教版”和“粤教版”教科书中实验内容的比较研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古师范大学, 2015.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133