全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

多核碳源与常规单一类型碳源的实际应用研究
Practical Application Research of Polynuclear Carbon Source and Conventional Single Type Carbon Source

DOI: 10.12677/AEP.2021.111007, PP. 62-77

Keywords: 多核碳源,外加碳源,脱氮单耗,降本增效
Multi-Core Carbon Source
, Additional Carbon Source, Unit Consumption of Nitrogen Removal, Cost Reduction and Efficiency Increase

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

目前我国大部分污水处理厂,都存在着进水碳氮比低,不能满足正常的生物反硝化脱氮的需求。所以为保证生物脱氮的正常进行,我们需要投加外加碳源,以满足污水厂正常的出水排放要求。本文选用多核碳源与通用单一类型碳源——乙酸钠、葡萄糖为外加碳源,在秦皇岛某水厂进行生产性平行对比实验,来研究多核碳源的脱氮性能和运行费用。结果表明:以多核碳源作为外加碳源相比乙酸钠,脱氮单耗降低了49.71%,吨水投加成本降低了17.41%。以多核碳源作为外加碳源比以葡萄糖,脱氮单耗降低了37.84%,吨水投加成本降低了20.83%。且在保证水厂出水稳定达标的前提下,可以实现水厂的降本增效,具有较高的市场推广价值。
At present, the low C/N ratio in the sewage is existing in most of the Sewage Treatment, which cannot guarantee the demand of normal biological nitrogen removal. So in order to ensure the normal operation of biological nitrogen removal, we need to add additional carbon source. In order to verify the economic applicability of polynuclear carbon sources, a comparative experiment was carried out in a water plant in Qinhuangdao using polynuclear carbon sources, sodium Acetate and glucose as additional carbon sources. The results show that the unit denitrification consumption is increased by 49.71% and the cost is reduced by 17.41%. Using polynuclear carbon source as carbon source is 37.84% lower than using glucose as carbon source, and the cost of adding carbon source is 20.83% lower. And under the premise of ensuring the water plant to meet the standard stably, the water plant can reduce cost and increase efficiency, which has high market promotion value.

References

[1]  王淑莹, 侯红勋, 许春生, 等. 以甲醇作为外碳源的生物反硝化[J]. 北京工业大学学报, 2009, 35(11): 1521-1526.
[2]  王洪贞, 李毅. 不同外碳源对生物反硝化影响的研究[J]. 科学与技术工程, 2013(13): 1671-1815.
[3]  孙永利, 许光明, 等. 城镇污水处理厂外加商业碳源的选择[J]. 中国给水排水, 2010, 26(19): 84-86.
[4]  Nyberg, U., Andersson, B. and Aspegren, H. (1996) Long-Term Experiences with External Carbon Sources for Nitrogen Removal. Water Science & Technology, 33, 109-116.
https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.1996.0314
[5]  冯延申, 黄天寅, 等. 反硝化脱氮新型外加碳源研究进展[J]. 现代化工, 2013, 33(10): 52-57.
[6]  杨敏, 孙永利, 郑兴灿. 不同外加碳源的反硝化效能与技术经济性分析[J]. 给水排水, 2010, 36(11): 125-128.
[7]  马勇, 彭永臻, 王淑莹. 不同外碳源对污泥反硝化特性的影响[J]. 北京工业大学学报, 2009, 35(6): 820-824.
[8]  殷芳芳, 王淑莹, 昂雪野, 等. 碳源类型对低温条件下生物反硝化的影响[J]. 环境科学, 2009, 30(1): 108-113.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133