|
威远基底结构与龙马溪组地层构造及沉积相关系研究
|
Abstract:
威远向斜钻井揭示,龙马溪组I段为主力气藏,其页岩厚度、品质变化较大,与产能关系密切。沉积微相的研究是储层目标评价、气藏描述的关键。但用地震资料精细描述龙马溪组I段优质页岩分布,还有一定难度。为此,通过基底结构分析上覆地层构造、沉积微相变化规律,并分析其形成机理;采用单井旋回划分,结合地震反射结构识别,建立层序地层格架;综合构造、沉积相描述,预测龙马溪I段页岩气藏分布规律。研究表明:下震旦统发育一个大型的洼陷,东南侧发育一个大型的隆起;上覆地层的向斜和背斜,与下震旦统的洼陷-隆起正好对应。其次,威远向斜中部优质页岩厚度较大、品质优,正对下方古洼陷位置;龙马溪组2-3段在东南侧发育由东南向西北进积的斜交反射,正对下震旦统古隆起位置,页岩品质也相对较差。威远向斜的构造、沉积相明显受下震旦统古洼陷–隆起控制。下震旦统大型洼陷上方的志留系洼陷,预测为龙马溪组I段优质页岩、最佳气藏分布带。
In the Weiyuan syncline, the shale of I section of Longmaxi group is the main gas reservoir. The thickness and the quality of the shale changes greatly, which is closed to the capacity. The study of sedimentary microfacies is the key to evaluate the reservoir targets and to describe gas reservoirs. However, it is difficulty using seismic data to describe the shale’s distribution. The structure of overlying strata and sedimentary microfacies are analyzed by studying basement structure and its formation mechanism. The sequence stratigraphic framework is established by single well cycle and seismic reflection structure. The description of structure and the sedimentary facies is synthesized to predict the shale gas reservoir of Longmaxi group. The research shows that: a large depression develops in the Lower Sinian and a large uplift in the southeast. The syncline and anticline of the overlying strata correspond to the depression-uplift of the Lower Sinian. Secondly, the shale of Weiyuan syncline, which is of great thickness and high quality, directly faces the ancient depression. Section 2-3 of the Longmaxi Formation develops oblique reflections from southeast to northwest which is opposite to the ancient uplift of the Lower Sinian, and of relatively poor quality. In Weiyuan syncline, the tectonic and sedimentary facies are obviously controlled by lower Sinian depression-uplift. It is forecasted that the Silurian depression, which is at the top of the sub-sag of the lower Sinian, is the best shale’s gas reservoir distribution zone.
[1] | 童亨茂, 蔡东升, 吴永平, 李晓光, 李绪深, 孟令箭. 非均匀变形域中先存构造活动性的判定[J]. 中国科学: 地球科学, 2011, 41(2): 158-168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-010-3080-6 |
[2] | 童亨茂, 聂金英, 孟令箭, 等. 基底先存构造对裂陷盆地断层形成和演化的控制作用规律[J]. 地学前缘, 2009(4): 97-104. |
[3] | 钟嘉猷. 实验构造地质学及其应用[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1998: 201-217. |
[4] | Wissing, S.B. and Pfiffner, O.A. (2003) Numerical Models for the Control of Inherited Basin Geometries on Structures and Emplacement of the Klippen Nappe (Swiss Prealps). Journal of Structural Geology, 25, 1213-1227.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8141(02)00159-1 |
[5] | 汪泽成, 赵文智, 李宗银, 江兴福, 李军. 基底断裂在四川盆地须家河组天然气成藏中的作用[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2008, 35(5): 541-547. http://dx.chinadoi.cn/10.3321/j.issn:1000-0747.2008.05.003 |
[6] | 王英民, 童崇光, 徐国强, 樊生利. 川中地区基底断裂的发育特征及成因机制[J]. 成都地质学院学报, 1991, 18(3): 52-60. |
[7] | 邹才能, 赵群, 丛连铸, 王红岩, 施振生, 武瑾, 等. 中国页岩气的开发进展、开发潜力及发展前景[J]. 天然气工业, 2021, 41(1): 1-14. |
[8] | 徐政语, 梁兴, 王维旭, 张介辉, 王希有, 舒红林, 等. 上扬子区页岩气甜点分布控制因素探讨——以上奥陶统五峰组—下志留统龙马溪组为例[J]. 天然气工业, 2016, 36(9): 35-43.
http://dx.chinadoi.cn/10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2016.09.004 |
[9] | 金之钧, 胡宗全, 高波, 赵建华. 川东南地区五峰组-龙马溪组页岩气富集与高产控制因素[J]. 地学前缘, 2016, 23(1): 1-10. http://dx.chinadoi.cn/10.13745/j.esf.2016.01.001 |
[10] | 孙莎莎, 苗晌, 董大忠, 施振生, 拜文华, 马超, 等. 中、上扬子地区晚奥陶世-早志留世古地理演化及页岩沉积模式[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2018, 39(6): 1087-1106. |
[11] | 王同, 张克银, 熊亮, 史洪亮, 董晓霞, 魏力民, 等. 四川自贡地区五峰组-龙马溪组下段古地貌刻画及其油气意义[J]. 石油实验地质, 2018, 40(6): 764-770. |
[12] | 魏国齐. 四川盆地构造特征与油气[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2019: 94-174. |
[13] | 刘顺. 四川盆地威远背斜的形成时代及形成机制[J]. 成都理工学院学报, 2001(4): 340-343.
http://dx.chinadoi.cn/10.3969/j.issn.1671-9727.2001.04.002 |
[14] | 孙玮, 罗志立, 刘树根, 陶晓风, 代寒松. 华南古板块兴凯地裂运动特征及对油气影响[J]. 西南石油大学学报: 自然科学版, 2011, 33(5): 1-8. http://dx.chinadoi.cn/10.3863/j.issn.1674-5086.2011.05.001 |
[15] | Mter Borgh, M., Oldenhuis, R. and Biermann, C. (2011) The Effects of Basement Ramps on Deformation of the Prebetics (Spain): A Combined Field and Analogue Modelling Study. Tectonophysics, 502, 62-74.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2010.04.013 |
[16] | 张金川, 聂海宽, 徐波, 等. 四川盆地页岩气成藏地质条件[J]. 天然气工业, 2008, 28(2): 151-156.
http://dx.chinadoi.cn/10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2008.02.045 |
[17] | 孟志勇. 四川盆地涪陵地区五峰组-龙马溪组含气页岩段纵向非均质性及其发育主控因素[J]. 石油天然气地质, 2016, 37(6): 828-846. |