全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

贵安腾讯数据中心隧道群围岩岩石力学性质及质量分级研究
Study on Rock Mechanical Properties and Quality Classification of Surrounding Rock of Tunnel Group in Gui’an Tencent Data Center

DOI: 10.12677/HJCE.2021.102015, PP. 132-141

Keywords: 贵安腾讯数据中心,声波测试,岩石力学性质,岩体完整性,BQ岩体质量分级
Gui’an Tencent Data Center
, Acoustic Testing, Mechanical Properties of Rock, Rock Mass Integrity, BQ Rock Mass Quality Classification

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

岩体质量评价结果对岩土工程设计与施工具有重要的参考价值,是岩土工程安全高效开展的重要保障。本文以贵安腾讯数据中心隧道群为工程实例,通过开展声波测试会和室内岩石力学试验,分别对隧道群围岩的岩石力学性质和质量分级进行了研究。研究结果表明:贵安腾讯数据中心隧道群中围岩的力学性质差异较大,单轴抗压强度范围为14.5~51.3 MPa,弹性模量范围为15.9~45.8 GPa;隧道群围岩完整性较差,完整性系数Kv变化范围为0.35~0.51,大多数围岩处于较破碎状态~破碎状态;BQ岩体质量评价结果表明,贵安腾讯数据中心隧道群围岩岩体质量为VI级岩体和V级岩体,这为后续的隧道设计施工提供了重要的参考,具有重要的研究意义。
The results of rock mass quality evaluation have important reference value for the design and construction of geotechnical engineering, and it is an important guarantee for the safe and efficient development of geotechnical engineering. In this paper, taking the tunnel group of Gui’an Tencent data center as an example, the rock mechanical properties and quality classification of the surrounding rock of the tunnel group are studied respectively through the acoustic test meeting and indoor rock mechanics test. The results show that: the mechanical properties of surrounding rock in the tunnel group of Gui’an Tencent data center are quite different; the uniaxial compressive strength range is 14.5~51.3 Mpa; the elastic modulus range is 15.9~45.8 GPa; the integrity of surrounding rock of the tunnel group is poor; the integrity coefficient Kv range is 0.35~0.51; most of the surrounding rock is in a relatively broken state~broken state. BQ rock quality evaluation results show that the surrounding rock mass quality of data center tunnel group is grade VI rock mass and grade V rock mass, which provides an important reference for the subsequent tunnel design and construction, and has important research significance.

References

[1]  牛文林, 李天斌. 岩爆隧道岩体质量评价的BQ法优化[J]. 成都理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 42(6): 658-664.
[2]  沙鹏, 赵逸文, 高书宇, 等. 隧道层状岩体质量评价的BQ分级改进[J]. 工程地质学报, 2020, 28(5): 942-950.
[3]  马世伟, 李守定, 李晓, 等. 隧道岩体质量智能动态分级KNN方法[J/OL]. 工程地质学报: 1-10 [2021-01-10].
[4]  葛丽娜, 易富, 王涛. 基于数字摄影测量的结构面信息表征及应用研究[J]. 计算力学学报, 2020, 37(5): 616-622.
[5]  张超, 宋卫东, 付建新. 分形理论在岩体质量评价中的研究[J]. 矿业研究与开发, 2020, 40(2): 71-75.
[6]  谭文辉, 武洋帆, 刘景军, 等. 深部岩体质量分级Q系统的改进[J]. 中国矿业, 2020, 29(2): 161-165.
[7]  陈卫忠, 田云, 王学海, 等. 基于修正[BQ]值的软岩隧道挤压变形预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3125-3134.
[8]  王章琼, 晏鄂川, 王亚军. 基于修正Q值的武当群片岩岩体质量分级方法研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2018, 55(1): 65-70.
[9]  李晓军, 李栋, 王子茂, 等. 腾讯七星数据中心隧道群围岩压力分析[J]. 土木工程, 2019, 8(6): 1045-1051.
[10]  王子茂, 郭红静, 李晓军. 特大断面浅埋隧道围岩变形控制技术研究[J]. 土木工程, 2020, 9(1): 17-26.
[11]  长江水利委员会长江科学院. SL2645-2001水利水电工程岩石试验规程[S]. 北京: 中国水利水电出版社, 2001.
[12]  蔡美峰, 何满朝, 刘东燕. 岩石力学与工程[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2002.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133