全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

To Be or Not to Be Listed? A Dilemma of the Greek-Owned Cyclical Shipping Companies

DOI: 10.4236/me.2021.122021, PP. 401-428

Keywords: Stock Exchanges & Shipping Finance, Shipping Asset Play, Perfect IPO Timing, Future Net Asset Values-NAVs, Management by Visioning

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

This work explained why only 31, out of about 1000 Greek-owned global shipping companies, raised from $1 b to $21 b from the international stock exchanges (mainly NYSE & NASDAQ), since mainly 2005. First, we thought that by analyzing the advantages and disadvantages of an IPO, we could possibly provide this answer, but these found almost balanced. We drew several times on Keynes. We found that Greek shipowners consider their profession as a way of life, and they dislike the function of Stock Exchanges where a separation of ownership from management can be accomplished. Surprisingly, we found that also Stock Exchanges dislike shipping sector, mainly for its volatility! Volatility—we showed—to be a coin with two sides: one side is that earnings, NAVs, etc. are not stable, creating risk and unreliability—this side is looked-up by Stock Exchanges and banks; the other side is that of reality, because shipping sector is a cyclical one, with 8 years on average duration, providing thus—as shown—great opportunities for extremely profitable asset appreciation, which is known as “asset play”! If banks, and stock exchanges, learned-well shipping sector, they had to provide finance at rock bottom earnings, and not at high, as they do, and for a longer tenor than 4 years (to prove this we used a number of case-studies). We showed, however, the high detrimental sensitivity of banks and stock exchanges to global

References

[1]  Apergis, N., & Sorros, J. (2010). Disaggregated Earnings and Stock Prices: Evidence from International Listed Shipping Firms. International Advances in Economic Research, 16, 269-281.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11294-010-9263-2
[2]  Drobetz, W., Schilling, D., & Tegtmeier, L. (2010). Common Risk Factors in the Returns of Shipping Stocks. Maritime Policy & Management, 37, 93-120.
https://doi.org/10.1080/03088830903533726
[3]  Gilpin, A. (1986). Dictionary of Economic and Financial Markets (5th ed.). London: Butterworths.
[4]  Gong, S. X. H., Firth, M., & Cullinane, K. (2006). Beta Estimation and Stability in the US-Listed International Transportation Industry. Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies, 9, 463-490.
https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219091506000811
[5]  Goulielmos, A. M. (1974). A Vintage Model Approach to Some Problems of Shipping Economics. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, Uxbridge: Brunel University.
[6]  Goulielmos, A. M. (2020). The Investment Strategy and the Growth Policy of Greek Shipowners Revealed, 1946-2020. Modern Economy, 11, 1858-1886.
https://doi.org/10.4236/me.2020.1111125
[7]  Goulielmos, A. M., Giziakis, C. V. & Palari, V. (2011). Advantages and Disadvantages of Managing Own Ships by a Third Party Ship Management Company: An Empirical Investigation. International Journal of Shipping and Transport Logistics, 3, 126-150.
https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSTL.2011.039375
[8]  Goulielmos, A. M., Goulielmos, M. A., & Gatzoli, A. (2009). The Accident of Passenger-Car Vessel Samina Express (2000), When 80 Persons Died: An Analysis by the Principle of Nonlinear Management. Disaster Prevention and Management Journal, 18, 338-358.
https://doi.org/10.1108/09653560910965682
[9]  Grammenos, C. T., & Arcoulis, A. (2002). Macroeconomic Factors And international Stock Returns. International Journal of Maritime Economics, 4, 81-99.
[10]  Grammenos, C. T., & Marcoulis, S. N. (1996). A Cross-Section Analysis of Stock Returns: The Case of Shipping Firms. Maritime Policy & Management, 23, 67-80.
https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839600000053
[11]  Kavussanos, M. G., & Marcoulis, S. N. (1997a). Risk and Return of US Water Transportation Stocks over Time and over Bull and Bear Market Conditions. Maritime Policy & Management, 24, 145-158.
https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839700000066
[12]  Kavussanos, M. G., & Marcoulis, S. N. (1997b). The Stock Market Perception of Industry Risk and Microeconomic Factors: The Case of the US Water Transportation Industry versus Other Transportation Industries. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 33, 147-158.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1366-5545(97)00015-X
[13]  Kavussanos, M. G., & Marcoulis, S. N. (1998). Beta Comparisons across Industries: A Water Transportation Industry Perspective. Maritime Policy & Management, 25, 175-184.
https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839800000027
[14]  Kavussanos, M. G., & Marcoulis, S. N. (2005). Cross-Industries Comparisons of the Behavior of Stock Returns in Shipping, Transportation and Other Industries. Research in Transportation Economics, 12, 107-142.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0739-8859(04)12004-0
[15]  Kavussanos, M. G., Juell-Scielse, A., & Forrest, M. (2003). International Comparison of Market Risks across Shipping-Related Industries. Maritime Policy & Management, 30, 107-122.
https://doi.org/10.1080/0308883032000069271
[16]  Keynes, J. M. (1936). The General Theory of Employment Interest and Money. London: Macmillan & Co Ltd.
[17]  Mandelbrot, B. B., & Hudson, R. L. (2006). The (mis)Behavior of Markets: A Fractal View of Financial Turbulence. New York, NY: Basic Books.
[18]  Priesmeyer, H. R. (1992). Organizations and Chaos: Defining the Methods of Nonlinear Management. Westport, Connecticut-London: Quorum Books.
[19]  Stokes, P. (1997). Ship Finance: Credit Expansion and the Boom-Bust Cycle (2nd ed.). London: LLP-Lloyd’s of London Press.
[20]  Stopford, M. (2009). Maritime Economics (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133