全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Scaling Behavior for the Susceptibility of the Vacuum

DOI: 10.4236/ijaa.2021.111002, PP. 11-36

Keywords: Extended Model of Gravity, Dark Matter, Dark Energy, Cosmic Evolution of Density Parameters, Gravitational Susceptibility of the Vacuum, Vacuum Energy, Polarization of Space

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Using the two-component superfluid model of Winterberg for space, two models for the susceptibility of the cosmic vacuum as a function of the cosmic scale parameter, a, are presented. We also consider the possibility that Newton’s constant can scale, i.e., G-1=G-1(a), to form the most general scaling laws for polarization of the vacuum. The positive and negative values for the Planckion mass, which form the basis of the Winterberg model, are inextricably linked to the value of G, and as such, both G and Planck mass are intrinsic properties of the vacuum. Scaling laws for the non-local, smeared, cosmic susceptibility, \"\", the cosmic polarization, \"\", the cosmic macroscopic gravitational field, \"\", and the cosmic gravitational field mass density, \"\", are worked out, with specific examples. At the end of recombination, i.e., the era of last scattering, using the polarization to explain dark matter, and the gravitational field mass density to explain dark energy, we find that, \"\". While this is an unconventional assignment, differing from the ΛCDM model, we believe this is correct, as localized dark matter (LDM) contributions can be much higher in this epoch than cosmic smeared values for susceptibility. All density parameter assignments in Friedmanns’ equation are cosmic averages, valid for distance scales in excess of 100 Mpc in the current epoch. We also evaluate the transition from ordinary matter dominance, to dark matter dominance, for the cosmos as a whole. We obtain for the transition points, z=1.66, for susceptibility model I, and, z=2.53 , for susceptibility model II.

References

[1]  Hajdukovic, D. (2011) Is Dark Matter an Illusion Created by the Gravitational Polarization of the Quantum Vacuum? Astrophysics and Space Science, 334, 215-218.
https://arxiv.org/abs/1106.0847
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-011-0744-4
[2]  Hajdukovic, D. (2015) What If Quantum Vacuum Fluctuations Are Virtual Gravitational Dipoles? The 3rd International Workshop on Antimatter and Gravity University College, London, 4-7 August 2015, 1-9.
https://indico.cern.ch/event/361413/contributions/1776293/attach
ments/1135100/1623933/WAG_2015_UCL_Hajduk.pdf
[3]  Hajdukovic, D. (2016) Quantum Vacuum as the Cause of the Phenomena Usually Attributed to Dark Matter. 28th Texas Symposium on Relativistic Astrophysics, Geneva, Switzerland, 13-18 December 2015.
https://indico.cern.ch/event/336103/contributions/786848/
[4]  Hajdukovic, D. (2020) On the Gravitational Field of a Point-Like Body Immersed in Quantum Vacuum. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 491, 4816-4828.
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02087886/document
[5]  Winterberg, F. (2003) Planck Mass Plasma Vacuum Conjecture. Zeitschrift für Naturforschung, 58, 231.
https://doi.org/10.1515/zna-2003-0410
[6]  Winterberg, F. (2002) Planck Mass Rotons as Cold Dark Matter and Quintessence. Zeitschrift für Naturforschung, 57, 202-204.
https://doi.org/10.1515/zna-2002-3-414
[7]  Winterberg, F. (1995) Derivation of Quantum Mechanics from the Boltzmann Equation for the Planck Aether. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 34, 2145.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00673076
[8]  Winterberg, F. (1998) The Planck Aether Model for a Unified Theory of Elementary Particles. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 33, 1275.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00670794
[9]  Winterberg, F. (1993) Physical Continuum and the Problem of a Finitistic Quantum Field Theory. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 32, 261.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00673716
[10]  Winterberg, F. (1992) Cosmological Implications of the Planck Aether Model for a Unified Field Theory. Zeitschrift für Naturforschung Physical Sciences, 47, 1217.
https://doi.org/10.1515/zna-1992-1207
[11]  Winterberg, F. (2002) The Planck Aether Hypothesis. The C.F. Gauss Academy of Science Press, Reno.
[12]  Pilot, C. (2020) Does Space Have a Gravitational Susceptibility? A Model for the ACDM Density Parameters in the Friedmann Equation.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/342993272_Does_Space_Have_a_Gravitational_
Susceptibility_A_Model_for_the_Density_Parameters_in_the_Friedmann_Equation
[13]  Pilot, C. (2018) Is Quintessence an Indication of a Time-Varying Gravitational Constant? Journal of High Energy Physics, Gravitation and Cosmology, 5, 41-81.
https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.06431
https://www.scirp.org/journal/paperinformation.aspx?paperid=88999
[14]  Pilot, C. (2019) The Age of the Universe Predicted by a Time Varying G? Journal of High Energy Physics, Gravitation and Cosmology, 5, 928-934.
https://www.scirp.org/Journal/paperinformation.aspx?paperid=94065
https://doi.org/10.4236/jhepgc.2019.53048
[15]  Pilot, C. (2020) Inflation and Rapid Expansion in a Variable G Model. International Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 10, 334-345.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/342988030_Inflation_and_Rapid_
Expansion_in_a_Variable_G_Model_slightly_revised_version
https://doi.org/10.4236/ijaa.2020.104018
[16]  Kolb, E.W. and Turner, M.S. (1989) The Early Universe. Addison-Wesley, Reading.
[17]  Baumann, D.D. (2015) Lecture Notes on Cosmology.
http://theory.uchicago.edu/~liantaow/my-teaching/dark-matter-472/lectures.pdf
[18]  Mather, J.C., et al. (1999) Calibrator Design for the COBE Far-Infrared Absolute Spectrophotometer (FIRAS). The Astrophysical Journal, 512, 511-520.
https://doi.org/10.1086/306805
[19]  Husdal, L. (2016) On Effective Degrees of Freedom in the Early Universe. Galaxies, 4, 78.
https://doi.org/10.3390/galaxies4040078
[20]  Dirac, P.A.M. (1937) The Cosmological Constants. Nature, 139, 323.
https://doi.org/10.1038/139323a0
[21]  Dirac, P.A.M. (1938) A New Basis for Cosmology. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A, 165, 199-208.
https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1938.0053
[22]  Dirac, P.A.M. (1974) Cosmological Models and the Large Numbers Hypothesis. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A, 338, 439-446.
https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1974.0095
[23]  Jordan, P. (1937) G Has to Be a Field. Naturwissenschaften, 25, 513-517.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01498368
[24]  Jordan, P. (1949) Formation of Stars and Development of the Universe. Nature, 164, 637-640.
https://doi.org/10.1038/164637a0
[25]  Vieweg, F. and Sohn, B. (1966) Heinz Haber: Die Expansion der Erde [The Expansion of the Earth] Unser blauer Planet [Our Blue Planet]. RororoSachbuch [Rororo Nonfiction] (In German) (RororoTaschenbuchAusgabe [Rororo Pocket Edition] ed.). Rowohlt Verlag, Reinbek, 48, 52, 54-55.
[26]  Kragh, H. (2015) Pascual Jordan, Varying Gravity, and the Expanding Earth. Physics in Perspective, 17, 107-134.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00016-015-0157-9
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00016-015-0157-9
[27]  Maeder, A., et al. (2018) Planck 2018 Results. VI. Cosmological Parameters.
[28]  Tanabashi, M., et al. (2019) Astrophysical Constants and Parameters. Physical Review D, 98, Article ID: 030001.
[29]  Planck Collaboration (2016) Planck 2015 Results. XIII. Cosmological Parameters. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 594, A13.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133