All Title Author
Keywords Abstract

Publish in OALib Journal
ISSN: 2333-9721
APC: Only $99


Relative Articles


Breast Asymmetry Evaluation Using Objective Measures after Breast Cancer Surgery

DOI: 10.4236/jbise.2021.141001, PP. 1-10

Keywords: Asymmetry Breast Surgery, Outcome Research, Surface Imaging, 3D Scan

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib


Although a positive cosmetic outcome is an important goal of breast cancer reconstruction, the objective analysis of breast aesthetics has yet to reach a gold standard or unified method to quantify breast symmetry. Several scoring systems, both subjective and objective, have been developed over the years to ensure the desirable outcome in breast symmetry, but these methods have yet to reach the unanimous acceptance in terms of accuracy, value and ease of use to be implemented in the clinical setting. By assessing several existing symmetry scores, most of which are based on 2D imaging, along with our own set of symmetry parameters applied to 3D patient images, the goal of this study is to determine if there is an advantage of 3D imaging in formulating an accurate objective breast aesthetic score over the existing objective scores. A reliable breast aesthetic score would improve the decision-making in surgery as well as improve patient satisfaction. Additionally, knowing the quantity and degree of breast asymmetry objectively will improve outcome and reduce revision rates, minimizing patient suffering and improving the overall quality of patient life and body image.


[1]  Hopwood, P., Fletcher, I., Lee, A. and Al Ghazal, S. (2001) A Body Image Scale for Use with Cancer Patients. European Journal of Cancer, 37, 189-197.
[2]  Ng, S.K., Hare, R.M., Kuang, R.J., Smith, K.M., Brown, B.J. and Hunter-Smith, D.J. (2016) Breast Reconstruction Post Mastectomy: Patient Satisfaction and Decision Making. Annals of Plastic Surgery, 76, 640-644.
[3]  Pusic, A.L., Klassen, A.F., Scott, A.M., Klok, J.A., Cordeiro, P.G. and Cano, S.J. (2009) Development of a New Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for Breast Surgery: The BREAST-Q. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 124, 345-353.
[4]  Cardoso, M.J., Cardoso, J., Amaral, N., Azevedo, I., Barreau, L., Bernardo, M., Christie, D., Costa, S., Fitzal, F., Fougo, J.L., Johansen, J., Macmillan, D., Mano, M.P., Regolo, L., Rosa, J., Teixeira, L. and Vrieling, C. (2007) Turning Subjective into Objective: The BCCT.core Software for Evaluation of Cosmetic Results in Breast Cancer Conservative Treatment. Breast, 16, 456-461.
[5]  Henseler, H., Smith, J., Bowman, A., Khambay, B.S., Ju, X., Ayoub, A. and Ray, A.K. (2013) Subjective versus Objective Assessment of Breast Reconstruction. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery, 66, 634-639.
[6]  Cardoso, M.J., Cardoso, J., Santos, A.C., Barros, H. and de Oliveira, M.C. (2006) Interobserver Agreement and Consensus over the Esthetic Evaluation of Conservative Treatment for Breast Cancer. Breast, 15, 52-57.
[7]  Krois, W., Riedl, O., Dubsky, P., Jakesz, R., Gnant, M., Wild, T. and Fitzal, F. (2009) Objective Cosmetic Analyses after Breast Surgery with the Breast Analysing Tool (BAT) Correlates with Subjective and Objective Scores: A New Tool for Prospective Trials. Cancer Research, 69, 345s-345s.
[8]  Krois, W., Wild, T. and Fitzal, F. (2010) Objective Cosmetic Analysis after Breast Surgery with the Breast Analysing Tool (BAT) Correlates with Subjective Scores: Improved Tool for Clinical Trials. European Journal of Cancer Supplements, 8, 234-235.
[9]  Pezner, R.D., Lipsett, J.A., Vora, N.L. and Desai, K.R. (1985) Limited Usefulness of Observer-Based Cosmesis Scales Employed to Evaluate Patients Treated Conservatively for Breast-Cancer. International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics, 11, 1117-1119.
[10]  Pezner, R.D., Patterson, M.P., Hill, L.R., Vora, N., Desai, K.R., Archambeau, J.O. and Lipsett, J.A. (1985) Breast retraction Assessment—An Objective Evaluation of Cosmetic Results of Patients Treated Conservatively for Breast-Cancer. International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics, 11, 575-578.
[11]  Van Limbergen, E., Van der Schueren, E. and Van Tongelen, K. (1989) Cosmetic Evaluation of Breast Conserving Treatment for Mammary Cancer. 1. Proposal of a Quantitative Scoring System. Radiotherapy and Oncology, 16, 159-167.
[12]  Noguchi, M., Saito, Y., Mizukami, Y., Nonomura, A., Ohta, N., Koyasaki, N., Taniya, T. and Miyazaki, I. (1991) Breast Deformity, Its Correction, and Assessment of Breast Conserving Surgery. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 18, 111-118.
[13]  Glener, A.D., Suresh, V., Shammas, R.L., Broadwater, G., Sergesketter, A., Taskindoust, M., Guo, X. and Hollenbeck, S.T. (2019) Volumetric Symmetry after Unilateral Autologous Breast Reconstruction: A Reasonable Goal. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open, 7, e2362.
[14]  Al-Ghazal, S.K., Blamey, R.W., Stewart, J. and Morgan, A.A.L. (1999) The Cosmetic Outcome in Early Breast Cancer Treated with Breast Conservation. European Journal of Surgical Oncology, 25, 566-570.
[15]  Al-Ghazal, S.K., Fallowfield, L. and Blamey, R.W. (1999) Patient Evaluation of Cosmetic Outcome after Conserving Surgery for Treatment of Primary Breast Cancer. European Journal of Surgical Oncology, 25, 344-346.
[16]  Krishnan, L., Stanton, A.L., Collins, C.A., Liston, V.E. and Jewell, W.R. (2001) Form or Function? Part 2. Objective Cosmetic and Functional Correlates of Quality of Life in Women Treated with Breast-Conserving Surgical Procedures and Radiotherapy. Cancer, 91, 2282-2287.<2282::AID-CNCR1259>3.0.CO;2-0
[17]  Cardoso, M.J., Cardoso, J.S., Wild, T., Krois, W. and Fitzal, F. (2009) Comparing Two Objective Methods for the Aesthetic Evaluation of Breast Cancer Conservative Treatment. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 116, Article No. 149.
[18]  Krois, W., Romar, A.K., Wild, T., Dubsky, P., Exner, R., Panhofer, P., Jakesz, R., Gnant, M. and Fitzal, F. (2017) Objective Breast Symmetry Analysis with the Breast Analyzing Tool (BAT): Improved Tool for Clinical Trials. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 164, 421-427.
[19]  Baldacchino, V.R., Bellizzi, A., Madada-Nyakauru, R.N., Kazzazi, F., Oni, G., Forouhi, P. and Malata, C.M. (2019) Assessment of Breast Symmetry in Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Therapeutic Mammaplasty Using the Breast Cancer Conservation Therapy Cosmetic Results Software (BCCT.core). Gland Surgery, 8, 218-225.
[20]  Yu, T., Eom, K.-Y., Jang, N.Y., Kim, K.S., Koo, T.R., Kwon, J., Kim, B.H., Kang, E., Kim, S.-W. and Kim, J.-S. (2016) Objective Measurement of Cosmetic Outcomes of Breast Conserving Therapy Using BCCT.core. Cancer Research and Treatment, 48, 491-498.
[21]  Hashem, T. and Farahat, A. (2017) Batwing versus Wise Pattern Mammoplasty for Upper Pole Breast Tumours: A Detailed Comparison of Cosmetic Outcome. World Journal of Surgical Oncology, 15, Article No. 60.
[22]  Moyer, H.R., Carlson, G.W., Styblo, T.M. and Losken, A. (2008) Three-Dimensional Digital Evaluation of Breast Symmetry after Breast Conservation Therapy. Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 207, 227-232.
[23]  Eder, M., Waldenfels, F.V., Swobodnik, A., Klöppel, M., Pape, A.K., Schuster, T., et al. (2012) Objective Breast Symmetry Evaluation Using 3-D Surface Imaging. The Breast, 21, 152-158.
[24]  Koban, K.C., Etzel, L., Li, Z., Pazos, M., Schonecker, S., Belka, C., Giunta, R.E., Schenck, T.L. and Corradini, S. (2020) Three-Dimensional Surface Imaging in Breast Cancer: A New Tool for Clinical Studies? Radiation Oncology, 15, Article No. 52.
[25]  O'Connell, R.L., Di Micco, R., Khabra, K., Wolf, L., deSouza, N., Roche, N., Barry, P.A., Kirby, A.M. and Rusby, J.E. (2017) The Potential Role of Three-Dimensional Surface Imaging as a Tool to Evaluate Aesthetic Outcome after Breast Conserving Therapy (BCT). Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 164, 385-393.
[26]  Zeng, Y.-C. (2019) Asymmetry Recognition of Mammogram Images Based on Convolutional Neural Network. 2019 IEEE 8th Global Conference on Consumer Electronics (GCCE), Osaka, 15-18 October 2019, 738-740.
[27]  Monton, J., Kenig, N., Insausti, R. and Jordan, J. (2020) Visual Breast Asymmetry Assessment with Optical-Flow Algorithm. Journal of Medical Systems, 44, Article No. 155.
[28]  Godden, A.R., O'Connell, R.L., Barry, P.A., Krupa, K.C.D., Wolf, L.M., Mohammed, K., Kirby, A.M. and Rusby, J.E. (2020) 3-Dimensional Objective Aesthetic Evaluation to Replace Panel Assessment after Breast-Conserving Treatment. Breast Cancer, 27, 1126-1136.
[29]  Bajaj, A.K., Kon, P.S., Oberg, K.C. and Miles, D.A. (2004) Aesthetic Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Breast Conservation Therapy for the Treatment of Localized Breast Cancer. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 114, 1442-1449.
[30]  Losken, A., Seify, H., Denson, D.D., Paredes Jr., A.A., and Carlson, G.W. (2005) Validating Three-Dimensional Imaging of the Breast. Annals of Plastic Surgery, 54, 471-476; discussion 477-478.
[31]  Hojan, K. and Manikowska, F. (2017) Can the Weight of an External Breast Prosthesis Influence Trunk Biomechanics during Functional Movement in Postmastectomy Women? BioMed Research International, 2017, Article ID: 9867694.
[32]  Sutradhar, A. and Miller, M.J. (2013) In Vivo Measurement of Breast Skin Elasticity and Breast Skin Thickness. Skin Research and Technology, 19, E191-E199.


comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us


WhatsApp +8615387084133

WeChat 1538708413