Validity of the PROMIS-10 Global Health assessed by telephone and on paper in minor stroke and transient ischaemic attack in the Netherlands

Objectives Dysfunction after transient ischaemic attack (TIA) and minor stroke is often underestimated by clinical measures. Patient-reported outcome measures used in value-based healthcare may help in detecting these problems. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System 10-Question Short Form (PROMIS-10 Global Health) is a concise patient-centred outcome measuring tool proposed for assessing health status in patients who had stroke. This study aims to address the validity of the Dutch PROMIS-10 in patients who had stroke in the Netherlands and also aims to compare telephone versus on-paper assessment. Design Observational cohort study. Setting Single-centre hospital in the Netherlands. Participants 75 patients who were diagnosed with TIA or minor stroke and discharged without rehabilitation treatment 1？year ago (between December 2014 and January 2016) completed the study. Primary and secondary outcome measures PROMIS-10 physical (PH) and mental health (MH) scores assessed 1？year poststroke on paper (n=37) and by telephone (n=38) was compared with RAND-36 physical and mental component scores assessed on paper. Results PROMIS-10 and RAND-36 correlated significantly in PH, r=0.81 (95%？CI 0.69 to 0.88), and MH, r=0.76 (95%？CI 0.64 to 0.85). Paper-and-pencil assessed correlations were r=0.87？and 0.79 for PH and MH, respectively. Telephone assessed correlations were r=0.76？and 0.73 for PH and MH, respectively. Internal consistency analysis indicated high reliabilities for both health components of the PROMIS-10, all Cronbach’s α>0.70. Conclusions The Dutch PROMIS-10 was found to strongly correlate with the RAND-36. Paper-and-pencil assessment was found to have a higher correlation than telephone assessment. This study provides support for the use of the Dutch PROMIS-10 in assessing health status in patients after TIA and minor stroke