豫沪两地一审离婚诉讼涉及家庭暴力案件的现状分析——基于对中国裁判文书网上354份裁判文书的统计分析
Analysis of Domestic Violence Cases Involved in First-Instance Divorce Proceedings in Henan and Shanghai—Based on the Statistical Analysis of 354 Judicial Documents on Chinese Judicial Documents Website

通过收集与分析河南省和上海市61家基层法院2019年上传至中国裁判文书网的354份一审离婚诉讼涉及家庭暴力的民事判决书发现：此类案件的原告多为女性；原告委托代理人的比例远大于被告；适用的审理程序主要为简易程序；原告提交除当事人陈述之外的证据比例低；原告提交的证据被法院采信的几率低；法院对只以家庭暴力为由提起的离婚诉讼的准予离婚率低。如何干预防治家庭暴力一直是社会难题，必须要立法、执法、司法以及社会组织多方共同努力，需要合理分配举证责任，细化公安机关执法程序，注重法律的教育作用，建立起多元化家庭暴力救济途径。
Through the collection and analysis of 354 civil judgments on domestic violence in first-instance divorce proceedings uploaded by 61 grassroots courts in Henan province and Shanghai in 2019 on The China Adjudicatory Documents Website, it is found that most of the plaintiffs in such cases are female. The proportion of entrusted agents by the plaintiff is much higher than that of the defendant. The applicable trial procedure is mainly summary procedure. The proportion of evidence submitted by the plaintiff other than the parties’ statements is low. The probability of the evidence presented by the plaintiff being admissible by the court is low. Courts grant divorce proceedings based solely on domestic violence with low rates of divorce. How to intervene and prevent domestic violence has always been a social problem, which requires the joint efforts of legislation, law enforcement, judicatory and social organizations. It is necessary to reasonably distribute the burden of proof, specify the law enforcement procedures of public security organs, pay attention to the educational role of law, and establish diversified domestic violence relief channels.