全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Third-Order Adjoint Sensitivity Analysis of an OECD/NEA Reactor Physics Benchmark: I. Mathematical Framework

DOI: 10.4236/ajcm.2020.104029, PP. 503-528

Keywords: Polyethylene-Reflected Plutonium Sphere, 1st-Order, 2nd-Order, and 3rd-Order Sensitivities, 3rd-Order Adjoint Sensitivity Analysis, Microscopic Total Cross Sections, Expected Value, Variance and Skewness of Response Distribution

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

This work extends to third-order previously published work on developing the adjoint sensitivity and uncertainty analysis of the numerical model of a polyethylene-reflected plutonium (acronym: PERP) OECD/NEA reactor physics benchmark. The PERP benchmark comprises 21,976 imprecisely known (uncertain) model parameters. Previous works have used the adjoint sensitivity analysis methodology to compute exactly and efficiently all of the 21,976 first-order and (21,976)2 second-order sensitivities of the PERP benchmark’s leakage response to all of the benchmark’s uncertain parameters, showing that the largest and most consequential 1st- and 2nd-order response sensitivities are with respect to the total microscopic cross sections. These results have motivated extending the previous adjoint-based derivations to third-order, leading to the derivation, in this work, of the exact mathematical expressions of the (180)3 third-order sensitivities of the PERP leakage response with respect to these total microscopic cross sections. The formulas derived in this work are valid not only for the PERP benchmark but can also be used for computing the 3rd-order sensitivities of the leakage response of any nuclear system involving fissionable material and internal or external neutron sources. Subsequent works will use the adjoint-based mathematical expressions obtained in this work to compute exactly and efficiently the numerical values of these (180)3 third-order sensitivities (which turned out to be very large and consequential) and use them for a third-order uncertainty analysis of the PERP benchmark’s leakage response.

References

[1]  Cacuci, D.G. (2018) The Second-Order Adjoint Sensitivity Analysis Methodology. CRC Press, New York.
https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315120270
[2]  Cacuci, D.G. (2019) Application of the Second-Order Comprehensive Adjoint Sensitivity Analysis Methodology to Compute 1st- and 2nd-Order Sensitivities of Flux Functionals in a Multiplying System with Source. Nuclear Science and Engineering 193, 555-600.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2018.1553910
[3]  Cacuci, D.G. (2019) Second-Order Sensitivities of a General Functional of the Forward and Adjoint Fluxes in a Multiplying Nuclear System with Source. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 344, 83-106.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2019.01.007
[4]  Cacuci, D.G. (2020) Second-Order Adjoint Sensitivity Analysis of a General Ratio of Functionals of the Forward and Adjoint Fluxes in a Multiplying Nuclear System with Source. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 135, Article ID: 106956.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2019.106956
[5]  Cacuci, D.G., Fang, R. and Favorite, J.A. (2019) Comprehensive Second-Order Adjoint Sensitivity Analysis Methodology (2nd-ASAM) Applied to a Subcritical Experimental Reactor Physics Benchmark: I. Effects of Imprecisely Known Microscopic Total and Capture Cross Sections. Energies, 12, 4219.
https://doi.org/10.3390/en12214219
[6]  Fang, R. and Cacuci, D.G. (2019) Comprehensive Second-Order Adjoint Sensitivity Analysis Methodology (2nd-ASAM) Applied to a Subcritical Experimental Reactor Physics Benchmark: II. Effects of Imprecisely Known Microscopic Scattering Cross Sections. Energies, 12, 4114.
https://doi.org/10.3390/en12214114
[7]  Cacuci, D.G., Fang, R., Favorite, J.A., Badea, M.C. and di Rocco, F. (2019) Comprehensive Second-Order Adjoint Sensitivity Analysis Methodology (2nd-ASAM) Applied to a Subcritical Experimental Reactor Physics Benchmark: III. Effects of Imprecisely Known Microscopic Fission Cross Sections and Average Number of Neutrons Per Fission. Energies, 12, 4100.
https://doi.org/10.3390/en12214100
[8]  Fang, R. and Cacuci, D.G. (2020) Comprehensive Second-Order Adjoint Sensitivity Analysis Methodology (2nd-ASAM) Applied to a Subcritical Experimental Reactor Physics Benchmark: IV. Effects of Imprecisely Known Source Parameters. Energies, 13, 1431.
https://doi.org/10.3390/en13061431
[9]  Fang, R. and Cacuci, D.G. (2020) Comprehensive Second-Order Adjoint Sensitivity Analysis Methodology (2nd-ASAM) Applied to a Subcritical Experimental Reactor Physics Benchmark: V. Computation of Mixed 2nd-Order Sensitivities Involving Isotopic Number Densities. Energies, 13, 2580.
https://doi.org/10.3390/en13102580
[10]  Cacuci, D.G., Fang, R. and Favorite, J.A. (2020) Comprehensive Second-Order Adjoint Sensitivity Analysis Methodology (2nd-ASAM) Applied to a Subcritical Experimental Reactor Physics Benchmark: VI. Overall Impact of 1st- and 2nd-Order Sensitivities on Response Uncertainties. Energies, 13, 1674,
https://doi.org/10.3390/en13071674
[11]  Valentine, T.E. (2006) Polyethylene-Reflected Plutonium Metal Sphere Subcritical Noise Measurements, SUB-PU-METMIXED-001. International Handbook of Evaluated Criticality Safety Benchmark Experiments, NEA/NSC/DOC(95)03/I-IX, Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development, Nuclear Energy Agency, Paris.
[12]  Cacuci, D.G. (2021) Third Order Adjoint Sensitivity Analysis of Reaction Rate Responses in a Multiplying Nuclear System with Source. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 151, Article ID: 107924.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2020.107924
[13]  Fang, R. and Cacuci, D.G. (2020) Third Order Adjoint Sensitivity and Uncertainty Analysis of an OECD/NEA Reactor Physics Benchmark: II. Computed Sensitivities. American Journal of Computational Mathematics, 10, 529-558.
https://doi.org/10.4236/ajcm.2020.104030
[14]  Fang, R. and Cacuci, D.G. (2020) Third Order Adjoint Sensitivity and Uncertainty Analysis of an OECD/NEA Reactor Physics Benchmark: III. Response Moments. American Journal of Computational Mathematics, 10, 559-570.
https://doi.org/10.4236/ajcm.2020.104031
[15]  Alcouffe, R.E., Baker, R.S., Dahl, J.A., Turner, S.A. and Ward, R. (2008) PARTISN: A Time-Dependent, Parallel Neutral Particle Transport Code System. LA-UR-08-07258, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos.
[16]  Wilson, W.B., Perry, R.T., Shores, E.F., Charlton, W.S., Parish, T.A., Estes, G.P., Brown, T.H., Arthur, E.D., Bozoian, M., England, T.R., et al. (2002) SOURCES4C: A Code for Calculating (α, n), Spontaneous Fission, and Delayed Neutron Sources and Spectra. Proceedings of the American Nuclear Society/Radiation Protection and Shielding Division 12th Biennial Topical Meeting, Santa Fe, 14-18 April 2002, 1-127.
[17]  Conlin, J.L., Parsons, D.K., Gardiner, S.J., Beth Lee, M.G.M. and White, M.C. (2013) MENDF71X: Multigroup Neutron Cross-Section Data Tables Based upon ENDF/B-VII.1X. Report LA-UR-15-29571, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, 1-11.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133