|
|
基于风险矩阵法的物资督办等级评估
|
Abstract:
本文通过对物资的交货关键性和技术复杂性进行分析，在此基础上引入了一种基于风险矩阵确定督办等级评估方法。通过风险矩阵评估提高了督办等级确定的针对性和准确性，为项目的物资督办管理提供了一种结构化的评估工具，具有很好的指导意义。
Based on the analysis of schedule criticality and technical complexity, this paper introduces a risk matrix based evaluation method to determine the expediting level. Through the risk matrix assessment, the pertinence and accuracy of the determination of the material expediting level are improved, and a structured assessment tool is provided for the expediting management of the project, which has a good guiding significance.
| [1] | 阮欣, 尹志逸, 陈艾荣. 风险矩阵评估方法研究与工程应用综述[J]. 同济大学学报, 2013(3): 381-385. |
| [2] | 朱启超, 匡兴华, 沈永平. 风险矩阵方法与应用述评[J]. 中国工程科学, 2003(1): 89-94. |
| [3] | Paul, R., Garvey, P.R. and Lansdowne, Z.F. (1998) Risk Matrix: An Approach for Identifying, Assessing, and Ranking Program Risks. Air Force Journal of Logistics, 22, 16-19. |
| [4] | Willllim, A.M. (1998) Establishing a Program Risk Baseline, an Annotated Briefing. The MITRE Corporation, Bedford. |
| [5] | Cox Jr, L.A. (2008) What’s Wrong with Risk Matrix. Risk Analysis, 28, 497.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01030.x |
| [6] | 张喜刚. 公路桥梁和隧道工程设计安全风险评估[M]. 北京: 人民交通出版社, 2010. |
| [7] | Eskesen, S.D., Tengborg, P., Kampmann, J., et a1. (2004) Guidelines for Tunnel-ling Risk Management: International Tunnelling Association, Working Group No. 2. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 19, 217.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2004.01.001 |
| [8] | Klein, J.H. and Cork, R.B. (1998) An Approach to Technical Risk Assessment. International Journal of Project Management, 16, 345-351. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(98)00006-4 |
| [9] | Bailey, R.O. (2003) Analysis of Current Department of Defense Risk Management Practices in Weapon System Acquisition: A Case Study of the Advanced Amphibious As-sault Vehicle PDRR and SDD Risk Management Practices. Naval Post-Graduate School, California. |
| [10] | Aven, T. and Heide, B. (2009) Reliability and Validity of Risk Analysis. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 94, 1862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2009.06.003 |
