全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

“一带一路”倡议下西部陆上能源通道安全风险评估研究
The Western Land Energy Channels Security Risk Assessment Research under “The Belt and Road” Initiative

DOI: 10.12677/JOGT.2020.423069, PP. 85-95

Keywords: 陆上能源通道,安全风险,综合评价,层次分析法,主成分分析
Onshore Energy Channels
, Safety Risk, Comprehensive Evaluation, Analytic Hierarchy Process, Principal Component Analysis

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

能源安全是国家总体安全观的重要组成部分。基于战略考虑,中国在加强海上能源通道安全保障的同时,也着力规划和构建陆上能源通道,西部地区则是国家的重点布局方向。本文在风险计量表达式的基础上,从微观和宏观视角选取安全风险指标,基于AHP-PCA加权模型进行系统评估。结果表明中哈原油管道安全风险概率最低,中巴伊管道安全风险概率最高。再将能源设计输送量记为损失,得到中国–中亚天然气管道A/B/C段安全风险最大,中哈原油管道安全风险最小。建议完善国家能源数据库建设,加强对沿线国家风险概率系统评估,计算国家可承受风险,以此规划各线路的设计输送量。
Energy security is an important component of the overall national security concept. Based on strategic considerations, while strengthening the security of maritime energy channel, China has also made great efforts to plan and build onshore energy channel. The western region is a major national priority. On the basis of risk measurement expressions, this paper selects safety risk indexes from micro and macro perspectives and conducts systematic evaluation based on AHP-PCA weighted model. The results show that the safety risk probability of China-Kazakhstan crude oil pipeline is the lowest while that of China-Pakistan Iran pipeline is the highest. Taking the energy design throughput as loss, it can be concluded that section A/B/C of the China-Central Asia natural gas pipeline has the highest safety risk, while the China-Pakistan-Iran crude oil pipeline has the lowest safety risk. The author suggests to improve the national energy database construction, strengthen the systematic assessment of the risk probability of countries along the route, and calculate the risk that the country can bear, so as to plan the design throughput of each route.

References

[1]  Kiriyama, E. and Kajikawa, Y. (2014) A Multilayered Analysis of Energy Security Research and the Energy Supply Process. Applied Energy, 123, 415-423.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.01.026
[2]  Geng, J.B. and Ji, Q. (2014) Multi-Perspective Analysis of China’s Energy Supply Security. Energy, 64, 541-550.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2013.11.036
[3]  自治区政府办公厅课题组, 陈德峰. 我国陆上能源资源安全大通道战略研究[J]. 新疆金融, 2008(S1): 25-36.
[4]  李琪. “丝绸之路”的新使命: 能源战略通道——我国西北与中亚国家的能源合作与安全[J]. 西安交通大学学报(社会科学版), 2007(2): 77-83.
[5]  吴玉杰, 李军, 李程. 国内外燃气管道失效率及失效原因对比与归纳[J]. 煤气与热力, 2019, 39(2): 1-5 + 44-45.
[6]  吕敏, 帅斌, 张士行, 左静. 国家运输支撑力下的陆上丝绸之路运输通道风险测算方法[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2019, 15(11): 185-190.
[7]  谢明华, 杨明珠. “一带一路”油气通道建设的地缘政治和安全风险[J]. 探索, 2016(2): 63-69.
[8]  Wu, J.S., Zhou, R., Xu, S.D., et al. (2017) Probabilistic Analysis of Natural Gas Pipeline Network Accident Based on Bayesian Network. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 46, 126-136.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2017.01.025
[9]  Senouci, A., Elabbasy, M., Elwakil, E., et al. (2014) A Model for Predicting Failure of Oil Pipelines. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 10, 375-387.
https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2012.756918
[10]  李军, 张宏, 梁海滨, 等. 基于模糊综合评价的燃气管道第三方破坏失效研究[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2016, 12(8): 140-145.
[11]  王霞, 段庆全. 基于改进层次分析法的油气管道风险因素权重计算[J]. 油气储运, 2019, 38(11): 1227-1231.
[12]  张杰. 基于主成分–聚类分析法的管道风险评价方法[J]. 油气储运, 2014, 33(2): 139-143.
[13]  杨理智, 张韧. 基于云模型的我国海上能源战略通道安全风险评估[J]. 军事运筹与系统工程, 2014, 28(1): 74-80.
[14]  Fell, R. and Hartford, D. (1997) Landslide Risk Management. In: Cruden, D. and Fell, R., Eds., Landslide Risk Assessment, Balkema, Rotterdam, 51-109.
[15]  邓雪, 李家铭, 曾浩健, 陈俊羊, 赵俊峰. 层次分析法权重计算方法分析及其应用研究[J]. 数学的实践与认识, 2012, 42(7): 93-100.
[16]  何晓群. 多元统计分析(第四版) [M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2015.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133